Paper · 2022 · Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

Effects of electromagnetic irrigation water treatment on soil properties and arbequina olive trees in Tunisia (Sminja, Zaghouan)

Rabeb Touati; Lamia Laajili-Ghezal; Ines Nsiri; et al.

6
claims
10
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

ABSTRACTThe scarcity of water is a major problem in Tunisia. Thus, 50% of water resources are with salinity higher than 1.5 g L−1 and 16% with salinity exceeding 3 g L−1. To use this saline water in crop irrigation, new technologies for water treatment can be applied such us electromagnetic irrigation water device. In this context, a field experiment was carried out at Zitouna Agricultural Development Company in Zaghouan governorate to study the impact of magnetized irrigation water on clay soil and on leaf mineral content of Arbequina olive tree growing under drip irrigation with saline water. Bimonthly soil samples were taken with an auger every 20 cm over 1 m depth. Olive leaf samples were taken from the trees located above the soil sampling points. The results showed that soil parameters variations are the same throughout the depths 0–20, 20–40, 40–60, 60–80, and 80–100 cm. As a consequence, the interpretation of the effect of magnetized irrigation water was restricted to 0–100 cm soil depth. However, a slight decrease of the pH was observed with the use of magnetized water. On other side, we reported that the electromagnetic treatment of irrigation water increases the soil moisture (Hs) and favors the absorption of N, P, K+, and Na+ by olive tree leaf tissues. Also, water use efficiency (WUE) in the plot irrigated with treated water is equal to 1.3 compared to that irrigated with untreated water. Thus, 30% improvement in yield using treated water.KEYWORDS: electromagnetic treatmentirrigation watersoilArbequina olive treessemi-arid region AcknowledgementWe are grateful to the research laboratory "LR-SPADD, LR03AGR02, University of Carthage" for their useful help in conducting and financing the present work. We would like also to thank Zitouna Agricultural Development Company to provide assistance in Aqua-4D electromagnetic processing equipment. We would like to take this opportunity to acknowledge the assistance of the company's staff and thank them for their professional advice, guidance, and continued support. The authors are immensely grateful to the anonymous reviewers for the constructive feedback and the editorial team of Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A slight decrease in soil pH was observed with magnetized irrigation water in the olive plot.

Taxon
olive treesOlea europaeat0
Treatment
magnetized watere0
Outcome
pHe0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a slight decrease of the pH was observed with the use of magnetized water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1094 · show in text ↑
t0

“arbequina olive trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Electromagnetic treatment of irrigation water increased soil moisture.

Taxon
olive treesOlea europaeat0
Treatment
electromagnetic treatment of irrigation watere0
Outcome
soil moisturee0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the electromagnetic treatment of irrigation water increases the soil moisture (Hs)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1128–1210 · show in text ↑
t0

“arbequina olive trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Electromagnetic treatment of irrigation water favored absorption of N, P and K+ by olive leaf tissues.

Taxon
olive treeOlea europaeae0
Organ / stage
leaf tissuese0
Treatment
electromagnetic treatment of irrigation watere0
Outcome
N, P, K+e0
Direction
favorse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the electromagnetic treatment of irrigation water increases the soil moisture (Hs) and favors the absorption of N, P, K+, and Na+ by olive tree leaf tissues”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1128–1284 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Electromagnetic treatment of irrigation water favored absorption of Na+ by olive leaf tissues.

Taxon
olive treeOlea europaeae0
Organ / stage
leaf tissuese0
Treatment
electromagnetic treatment of irrigation watere0
Outcome
Na+e0
Direction
favorse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the electromagnetic treatment of irrigation water increases the soil moisture (Hs) and favors the absorption of N, P, K+, and Na+ by olive tree leaf tissues”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1128–1284 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water use efficiency in the plot irrigated with treated water was 1.3, compared with the plot irrigated with untreated water.

Taxon
olive treesOlea europaeat0
Treatment
treated watere0
Outcome
water use efficiency (WUE)e0
Value
1.3e0
Comparator
untreated watere0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water use efficiency (WUE) in the plot irrigated with treated water is equal to 1.3 compared to that irrigated with untreated water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1292–1423 · show in text ↑
t0

“arbequina olive trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Using treated water gave a 30% improvement in olive yield.

Taxon
olive treesOlea europaeat0
Treatment
treated watere0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
improvemente0
Value
30%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“30% improvement in yield using treated water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1431–1475 · show in text ↑
t0

“arbequina olive trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–98 · show in text ↑

irrigation · physiology: ion balance · Olea europaea (common olive)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

irrigation · soil: physics · Olea europaea (common olive)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.