Paper · 2022 · Microbiome

Heritability of tomato rhizobacteria resistant to Ralstonia solanacearum

Jiakang Yin; Ziliang Zhang; Chengcheng Zhu; et al.

8
claims
18
verbatim quotes
57
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ralstonia solanacearum (Rs) is a soilborne phytopathogen that causes bacterial wilt and substantial yield losses in many plants, such as tomatoes. A resistant tomato cultivar can recruit a beneficial microbiome from soil to resist Rs. However, whether this recruitment is inheritable from resistant parent to progeny has not been determined. RESULTS: In the present study, we investigated the rhizosphere microbiomes of tomatoes with clear kinship and different resistance against Rs. Resistant tomatoes grown with the additions of natural soil or its extract showed lower disease indexes than those grown in the sterile soil, demonstrating the importance of soil microbiome in resisting Rs. The results of 16S ribosomal RNA gene amplicon sequencing revealed that the resistant cultivars had more robust rhizosphere microbiomes than the susceptible ones. Besides, the resistant progeny HF12 resembled its resistant parent HG64 in the rhizosphere microbiome. The rhizosphere microbiome had functional consistency between HF12 and HG64 as revealed by metagenomics. Based on multi-omics analysis and experimental validation, two rhizobacteria (Sphingomonas sp. Cra20 and Pseudomonas putida KT2440) were enriched in HF12 and HG64 with the ability to offer susceptible tomatoes considerable protection against Rs. Multiple aspects were involved in the protection, including reducing the virulence-related genes of Rs and reshaping the transcriptomes of the susceptible tomatoes. CONCLUSIONS: We found promising bacteria to suppress the tomato bacterial wilt in sustainable agriculture. And our research provides insights into the heritability of Rs-resistant tomato rhizobacteria, echoing the inheritance of tomato genetic material. Video Abstract.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Resistant tomatoes with natural soil or its extract had lower disease indexes than those in sterile soil.

Treatment
additions of natural soil or its extracte0
Interactor
Ralstonia solanacearumRalstonia solanacearume1pathogen
Outcome
disease indexese0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
the sterile soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ralstonia solanacearum
Ralstonia solanacearum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series, Bugwood.org · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Resistant tomatoes grown with the additions of natural soil or its extract showed lower disease indexes than those grown in the sterile soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 497–637 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ralstonia solanacearum (Rs) is a soilborne phytopathogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 12–68 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Resistant cultivars had more robust rhizosphere microbiomes than susceptible cultivars.

Outcome
rhizosphere microbiomese0
Direction
more robuste0
Comparator
the susceptible onese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the resistant cultivars had more robust rhizosphere microbiomes than the susceptible ones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–865 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomatoes with clear kinship”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 432–459 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Resistant progeny HF12 resembled resistant parent HG64 in rhizosphere microbiome composition.

Material
HF12e0
Outcome
rhizosphere microbiomee0
Comparator
HG64e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the resistant progeny HF12 resembled its resistant parent HG64 in the rhizosphere microbiome”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–968 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomatoes with clear kinship”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 432–459 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizosphere microbiome functions were consistent between HF12 and HG64 in metagenomic analysis.

Material
HF12e0
Outcome
rhizosphere microbiomee0
Comparator
HG64e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The rhizosphere microbiome had functional consistency between HF12 and HG64 as revealed by metagenomics.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 970–1074 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomatoes with clear kinship”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 432–459 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sphingomonas sp. Cra20 was enriched in resistant HF12 and HG64 and could protect susceptible tomatoes against Rs.

Material
HF12e0
Interactor
Ralstonia solanacearumRalstonia solanacearume1pathogen
Second interactor
Sphingomonas sp. Cra20e0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
considerable protection against Rse0
Direction
enrichede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ralstonia solanacearum
Ralstonia solanacearum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series, Bugwood.org · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two rhizobacteria (Sphingomonas sp. Cra20 and Pseudomonas putida KT2440) were enriched in HF12 and HG64 with the ability to offer susceptible tomatoes considerable protection against Rs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1134–1319 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ralstonia solanacearum (Rs) is a soilborne phytopathogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 12–68 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pseudomonas putida KT2440 was enriched in resistant HF12 and HG64 and could protect susceptible tomatoes against Rs.

Material
HG64e0
Interactor
Ralstonia solanacearumRalstonia solanacearume1pathogen
Second interactor
Pseudomonas putida KT2440Pseudomonas putida KT2440e0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
considerable protection against Rse0
Direction
enrichede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ralstonia solanacearum
Ralstonia solanacearum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series, Bugwood.org · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas putida KT2440
Pseudomonas putida KT2440 · Second interactor · picture of the speciesAgricultural Research Service (NRRL)Culture Collection · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two rhizobacteria (Sphingomonas sp. Cra20 and Pseudomonas putida KT2440) were enriched in HF12 and HG64 with the ability to offer susceptible tomatoes considerable protection against Rs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1134–1319 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ralstonia solanacearum (Rs) is a soilborne phytopathogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 12–68 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Protection involved reduction of Rs virulence-related genes.

Interactor
Ralstonia solanacearumRalstonia solanacearume2pathogen
Outcome
reducing the virulence-related genes of Rse0
Qualifier
protectione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ralstonia solanacearum
Ralstonia solanacearum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series, Bugwood.org · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Multiple aspects were involved in the protection, including reducing the virulence-related genes of Rs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1321–1423 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomatoes with clear kinship”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 432–459 · show in text ↑
e2

“Ralstonia solanacearum (Rs) is a soilborne phytopathogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 12–68 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Protection involved reshaping susceptible tomato transcriptomes.

Interactor
Ralstonia solanacearumRalstonia solanacearume2pathogen
Outcome
reshaping the transcriptomese0
Qualifier
protectione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ralstonia solanacearum
Ralstonia solanacearum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series, Bugwood.org · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reshaping the transcriptomes of the susceptible tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1428–1484 · show in text ↑
e1

“Multiple aspects were involved in the protection, including reducing the virulence-related genes of Rs and reshaping the transcriptomes of the susceptible tomatoes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1321–1485 · show in text ↑
e2

“Ralstonia solanacearum (Rs) is a soilborne phytopathogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 12–68 · show in text ↑

botanical · Ralstonia solanacearum · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 28 positive, 3 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.