Paper · 2022 · Foods

The Effects of Storage Temperature, Light Illumination, and Low-Temperature Plasma on Fruit Rot and Change in Quality of Postharvest Gannan Navel Oranges

Ying Sun; Yuanyuan Li; Yu Xu; et al.

14
claims
14
verbatim quotes
20
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Osbeck cv. Newhall) is an economically important fruit, but postharvest loss occurs easily during storage. In this study, the effects of different temperatures, light illuminations, and low-temperature plasma treatments on the water loss and quality of the Gannan navel orange were investigated. The fruit began to rot after 90 d of storage at 5 °C and 20-45 d at 26 °C. Navel oranges stored at 26 °C had 7.2-fold and 3.1-fold higher rates of water loss at the early and late storage stages, respectively, as compared with those stored at 5 °C. Storage at 5 °C decreased the contents of total soluble solids at the early storage stage and the contents of titratable acids at the late storage stage, whereas storage at 26 °C decreased the contents of total soluble solids at the late storage stage and the contents of titratable acids at the early storage stage, respectively. Application of low-temperature plasma produced by air ionization for 6 min, or continuous blue or red light illumination significantly inhibited water loss within 7 and 21 d of storage at 22 °C, respectively, but exhibited no significant effect on fruit quality. Furthermore, the low-temperature plasma treatment protected against fruit rot. Thus, treatment with low-temperature plasma followed by storage at a low temperature under continuous red or blue light illumination was of potential value as a green technology for preserving Gannan navel orange during storage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Orange fruit first rotted after 90 days at 5 °C.

Outcome
fruit began to rote0
Value
90 de0
Setting
5 °Ce0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The fruit began to rot after 90 d of storage at 5 °C and 20-45 d at 26 °C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–369 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Orange fruit first rotted after 20-45 days at 26 °C.

Outcome
fruit began to rote0
Value
20-45 de0
Setting
26 °Ce0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The fruit began to rot after 90 d of storage at 5 °C and 20-45 d at 26 °C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–369 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At the early storage stage, water loss at 26 °C was 7.2-fold higher than at 5 °C.

Taxon
Navel orangesCitrus sinensise0
Organ / stage
earlye0
Treatment
26 °Ce0
Outcome
rates of water losse0
Direction
highere0
Value
7.2-folde0
Comparator
5 °Ce0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Navel oranges stored at 26 °C had 7.2-fold and 3.1-fold higher rates of water loss at the early and late storage stages, respectively, as compared with those stored at 5 °C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 371–543 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At the late storage stage, water loss at 26 °C was 3.1-fold higher than at 5 °C.

Taxon
Navel orangesCitrus sinensise0
Organ / stage
latee0
Treatment
26 °Ce0
Outcome
rates of water losse0
Direction
highere0
Value
3.1-folde0
Comparator
5 °Ce0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Navel oranges stored at 26 °C had 7.2-fold and 3.1-fold higher rates of water loss at the early and late storage stages, respectively, as compared with those stored at 5 °C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 371–543 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Storage at 5 °C decreased soluble solids early.

Organ / stage
early storage stagee0
Treatment
5 °Ce0
Outcome
contents of total soluble solidse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Storage at 5 °C decreased the contents of total soluble solids at the early storage stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 545–634 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Storage at 5 °C decreased titratable acids late.

Organ / stage
late storage stagee0
Outcome
contents of titratable acidse0
Direction
decreaseinferrede0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the contents of titratable acids at the late storage stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–697 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Storage at 26 °C decreased soluble solids late.

Organ / stage
late storage stagee0
Treatment
26 °Ce0
Outcome
contents of total soluble solidse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“storage at 26 °C decreased the contents of total soluble solids at the late storage stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–796 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Storage at 26 °C decreased titratable acids early.

Organ / stage
early storage stagee0
Outcome
contents of titratable acidse0
Direction
decreaseinferrede0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the contents of titratable acids at the early storage stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–860 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Six minutes of air ionization plasma inhibited orange water loss within seven days at 22 °C.

Treatment
low-temperature plasma produced by air ionization for 6 mine0
Outcome
water losse0
Direction
inhibitede0
Value
7 and 21 de0
Setting
22 °Ce0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Application of low-temperature plasma produced by air ionization for 6 min, or continuous blue or red light illumination significantly inhibited water loss within 7 and 21 d of storage at 22 °C, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–1083 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Continuous blue light significantly inhibited orange water loss within 21 days at 22 °C.

Treatment
continuous bluee0
Outcome
water losse0
Direction
inhibitede0
Value
21 de0
Setting
22 °Ce0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“continuous blue or red light illumination significantly inhibited water loss within 7 and 21 d of storage at 22 °C, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 955–1083 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Continuous red light significantly inhibited orange water loss within 21 days at 22 °C.

Treatment
red light illuminatione0
Outcome
water losse0
Direction
inhibitede0
Value
21 de0
Setting
22 °Ce0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“continuous blue or red light illumination significantly inhibited water loss within 7 and 21 d of storage at 22 °C, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 955–1083 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plasma had no significant effect on fruit quality.

Treatment
low-temperature plasma treatmente0
Outcome
fruit rote0
Direction
protectede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“low-temperature plasma treatment protected against fruit rot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1216 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plasma protected orange fruit against rot.

Treatment
low-temperature plasma treatmente0
Outcome
fruit rote0
Direction
protectede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the low-temperature plasma treatment protected against fruit rot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1152–1216 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors propose plasma followed by cold storage under blue or red light for orange preservation.

Taxon
Gannan navel orangee0
Treatment
low-temperature plasma followed by storage at a low temperature under continuous red or blue light illuminatione0
Outcome
preserving Gannan navel orange during storagee0

Verbatim

e0

“treatment with low-temperature plasma followed by storage at a low temperature under continuous red or blue light illumination was of potential value as a green technology for preserving Gannan navel orange during storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1224–1445 · show in text ↑

cold · disease · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.