Paper · 2022 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Contrasting effect of irrigation practices on the cotton rhizosphere microbiota and soil functionality in fields

Bin Peng; Shuai Zhao; Samiran Banerjee; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
16
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Drip irrigation under plastic film mulch is a common agricultural practice used to conserve water. However, compared to traditional flood irrigation with film mulch, this practice limit cotton root development from early flowering stage and may cause premature senescence in cotton. Changes of root will consequently shape the composition and activity of rhizosphere microbial communities, however, the effect of this farming practice on cotton rhizosphere microbiota remains poorly understood. This study investigated rhizosphere bacteria and soil functionality in response to different irrigation practices —including how changes in rhizosphere bacterial diversity alter soil nutrient cycling. Drip irrigation under plastic film mulch was shown to enhance bacterial diversity by lowering the salinity and increasing the soil moisture. However, the reduced root biomass and soluble sugar content of roots decreased potential copiotrophic taxa, such as Bacteroidetes , Firmicutes , and Gamma- proteobacteria , and increased potential oligotrophic taxa, such as Actinobacteria , Acidobacteria , and Armatimonadetes . A core network module was strongly correlated with the functional potential of soil. This module not only contained most of the keystone taxa but also comprised taxa belonging to Planctomycetaceae , Gemmatimonadaceae , Nitrosomonadaceae , and Rhodospirillaceae that were positively associated with functional genes involved in nutrient cycling. Drip irrigation significantly decreased the richness of the core module and reduced the functional potential of soil in the rhizosphere. Overall, this study provides evidence that drip irrigation under plastic film mulch alters the core bacterial network module and suppresses soil nutrient cycling.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip irrigation under film mulch enhanced cotton rhizosphere bacterial diversity.

Treatment
Drip irrigation under plastic film mulche0
Outcome
bacterial diversitye0
Direction
enhancee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drip irrigation under plastic film mulch was shown to enhance bacterial diversity by lowering the salinity and increasing the soil moisture.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–836 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton rhizosphere microbiota”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 438–467 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip irrigation lowered soil salinity.

Treatment
Drip irrigation under plastic film mulche0
Outcome
salinitye0
Direction
loweringe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drip irrigation under plastic film mulch was shown to enhance bacterial diversity by lowering the salinity and increasing the soil moisture.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–836 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton rhizosphere microbiota”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 438–467 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip irrigation increased soil moisture.

Treatment
Drip irrigation under plastic film mulche0
Outcome
soil moisturee0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drip irrigation under plastic film mulch was shown to enhance bacterial diversity by lowering the salinity and increasing the soil moisture.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–836 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton rhizosphere microbiota”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 438–467 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced cotton root biomass and soluble sugar content were associated with fewer potential copiotrophic taxa.

Organ / stage
rootse0
Outcome
potential copiotrophic taxae0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
reduced root biomass and soluble sugar content of rootse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the reduced root biomass and soluble sugar content of roots decreased potential copiotrophic taxa, such as Bacteroidetes , Firmicutes , and Gamma- proteobacteria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–1007 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton rhizosphere microbiota”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 438–467 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced cotton root biomass and soluble sugar content were associated with more potential oligotrophic taxa.

Organ / stage
rootse0
Outcome
potential oligotrophic taxae0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the reduced root biomass and soluble sugar content of roots decreased potential copiotrophic taxa, such as Bacteroidetes , Firmicutes , and Gamma- proteobacteria , and increased potential oligotrophic taxa, such as Actinobacteria , Acidobacteria , and Armatimonadetes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–1113 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton rhizosphere microbiota”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 438–467 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A core rhizosphere network module was strongly correlated with soil functional potential.

Outcome
functional potential of soile0
Qualifier
core network modulee0

Not reportedSettingDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A core network module was strongly correlated with the functional potential of soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1200 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton rhizosphere microbiota”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 438–467 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The core module contained most keystone taxa and taxa positively associated with nutrient cycling genes.

Outcome
keystone taxae0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This module not only contained most of the keystone taxa but also comprised taxa belonging to Planctomycetaceae , Gemmatimonadaceae , Nitrosomonadaceae , and Rhodospirillaceae that were positively associated with functional genes involved in nutrient cycling.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1201–1460 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton rhizosphere microbiota”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 438–467 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip irrigation significantly decreased richness of the core rhizosphere module.

Treatment
Drip irrigatione0
Outcome
richness of the core modulee0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drip irrigation significantly decreased the richness of the core module and reduced the functional potential of soil in the rhizosphere.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1461–1597 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton rhizosphere microbiota”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 438–467 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip irrigation reduced soil functional potential in the rhizosphere.

Treatment
Drip irrigatione0
Outcome
functional potential of soil in the rhizospheree0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drip irrigation significantly decreased the richness of the core module and reduced the functional potential of soil in the rhizosphere.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1461–1597 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton rhizosphere microbiota”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 438–467 · show in text ↑

mulching · soil: biology · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

irrigation · soil: biology · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.