Paper · 2016 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

Productivity and water use of flax at different moisturing of drained soil

T. S. Zinkovskaya; N. G. Kovalev; V. N. Zinkovskiy

14
claims
20
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

The article presents the results of research related with the study of productivity, water consumption and feasibility of irrigation in flax at different levels of fertility and moisture regimes of drained soil. The experiment was conducted on three backgrounds of agrochemical fertility: 1) control (no fertilizer). 2. The aftereffect of multi-purpose compost (KMN). 3. KMN + NPK (NPK - from 2011 till 2013 in the calculation on the planned crop under the previous culture). Fiber flax is need in irrigation during a dry period of growth to obtain a sufficiently high yield of straw and seeds. Watering with norm of 150 m3 / ha after sowing increased the number of surviving plants till harvesting by 30-35%. Carrying of 3-4 irrigation during growth season increased the straw flax yield from 22.7 to 40.4%, the seeds yield - from 10.5 to 53.2%. In the variant KMN + NPK increments of straw and seeds yields at the expense of irrigation reached 40.4 and 53.2% respectively. Payback additional cost amounted to 2.00 rubles / rubles. In the variant with aftereffect of KMN during the fourth year after the inputting of 15 t / ha under irrigation increase in straw flax yield amounted to almost 30%, seed - 26.7%. Payback costs of obtaining of increases yield was 1.43 rubles per each ruble of costs incurred. The total water consumption of flax without irrigation was about 2000 m3 / ha, at irrigation - more than 4000 m3 / ha. At the growth of flax productivity on the more fertile backgrounds coefficient of water use (Kv) decreases by 29% (non-irrigation) and 40% (for irrigation).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Flax irrigation was recommended during dry growth periods for high straw and seed yield.

Outcome
need in irrigation during a dry period of growthe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fiber flax is need in irrigation during a dry period of growth to obtain a sufficiently high yield of straw and seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 476–593 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Post-sowing irrigation increased surviving plants at harvest by 30-35%.

Treatment
Watering with norm of 150 m3 / ha after sowinge0
Outcome
number of surviving plants till harvestinge0
Direction
increasede0
Value
30-35%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Watering with norm of 150 m3 / ha after sowing increased the number of surviving plants till harvesting by 30-35%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 595–708 · show in text ↑
t0

“Productivity and water use of flax at different moisturing of drained soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three to four irrigations increased straw flax yield by 22.7 to 40.4%.

Treatment
3-4 irrigation during growth seasone0
Outcome
straw flax yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
22.7 to 40.4%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Carrying of 3-4 irrigation during growth season increased the straw flax yield from 22.7 to 40.4%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–807 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three to four irrigations increased flax seed yield by 10.5 to 53.2%.

Treatment
different moisturingt0
Outcome
seeds yielde0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
10.5 to 53.2%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the seeds yield - from 10.5 to 53.2%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–845 · show in text ↑
t0

“Productivity and water use of flax at different moisturing of drained soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under KMN + NPK, irrigation increased straw yield by 40.4%.

Treatment
irrigatione0
Outcome
strawe0
Direction
incrementse0
Value
40.4e0
Qualifier
KMN + NPKe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the variant KMN + NPK increments of straw and seeds yields at the expense of irrigation reached 40.4 and 53.2% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–973 · show in text ↑
t0

“Productivity and water use of flax at different moisturing of drained soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under KMN + NPK, irrigation increased seed yield by 53.2%.

Treatment
irrigatione0
Outcome
seeds yieldse0
Direction
incrementse0
Value
53.2%e0
Qualifier
KMN + NPKe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the variant KMN + NPK increments of straw and seeds yields at the expense of irrigation reached 40.4 and 53.2% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–973 · show in text ↑
t0

“Productivity and water use of flax at different moisturing of drained soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–74 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

KMN + NPK irrigation payback was 2.00 rubles per ruble.

Outcome
Payback additional coste0
Value
2.00 rubles / rublese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Payback additional cost amounted to 2.00 rubles / rubles”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1031 · show in text ↑
t0

“Productivity and water use of flax at different moisturing of drained soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under residual KMN, irrigation increased straw flax yield by almost 30%.

Treatment
irrigatione0
Outcome
straw flax yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
almost 30%e0
Qualifier
aftereffect of KMNe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the variant with aftereffect of KMN during the fourth year after the inputting of 15 t / ha under irrigation increase in straw flax yield amounted to almost 30%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1033–1196 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under residual KMN, irrigation increased seed yield by 26.7%.

Treatment
irrigatione0
Outcome
seede0
Direction
increasee0
Value
26.7%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under irrigation increase in straw flax yield amounted to almost 30%, seed - 26.7%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1128–1210 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual KMN irrigation payback was 1.43 rubles per ruble.

Outcome
Payback costse0
Value
1.43 rubles per each ruble of costs incurrede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Payback costs of obtaining of increases yield was 1.43 rubles per each ruble of costs incurred”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1212–1306 · show in text ↑
t0

“Productivity and water use of flax at different moisturing of drained soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–74 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flax consumed about 2000 m3/ha water without irrigation.

Outcome
total water consumptione0
Value
about 2000 m3 / hae0
Qualifier
without irrigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The total water consumption of flax without irrigation was about 2000 m3 / ha, at irrigation - more than 4000 m3 / ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1308–1425 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flax consumed more than 4000 m3/ha water with irrigation.

Outcome
total water consumptione0
Value
more than 4000 m3 / hae0
Qualifier
at irrigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The total water consumption of flax without irrigation was about 2000 m3 / ha, at irrigation - more than 4000 m3 / ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1308–1425 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

More fertile soil reduced non-irrigated water-use coefficient by 29%.

Outcome
coefficient of water use (Kv)e0
Direction
decreasese0
Value
29%e0
Qualifier
non-irrigatione0
Setting
more fertile backgroundse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At the growth of flax productivity on the more fertile backgrounds coefficient of water use (Kv) decreases by 29% (non-irrigation) and 40% (for irrigation)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1427–1582 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

More fertile soil reduced irrigated water-use coefficient by 40%.

Outcome
coefficient of water use (Kv)e0
Direction
decreasese0
Value
40%e0
Qualifier
for irrigatione0
Setting
more fertile backgroundse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At the growth of flax productivity on the more fertile backgrounds coefficient of water use (Kv) decreases by 29% (non-irrigation) and 40% (for irrigation)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1427–1582 · show in text ↑

climate site · yield · Linum usitatissimum (flax)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

irrigation · yield · Linum usitatissimum (flax)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 25 positive, 3 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.