Paper · 2022 · Journal of Bamboo and Rattan

Growth performance of selected bamboo species suitable for humid tropics of Kerala, India

Amani KA; Kunhamu TK; Jijeesh CM; et al.

12
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field study was carried out in two-year-old bambusetum established at main campus, Kerala Agricultural University, Thrissur, Kerala to evaluate the growth performance of selected six bamboo species of potential relevance to the humid tracts of Kerala, India. The selected bamboos included are Dendrocalamus longispathus Kurz; D. brandisii (Munro) Kurz, D. asper (Schult.f.) Back.ex Heyne; Bambusa balcooa Roxb; B. vulgaris Schrad and B. tulda Roxb. Growth parameters such as clump height, clump circumference (at 1.37 m), culm girth (at 1.37 m), internodal length and number of culms were observed in the field at periodic intervals of four months. The field result showed considerable variation in growth and productivity among the six bamboo species under study. Overall growth performance was better for B. vulgaris, D. brandisii and D. longispathus. For instance, B. vulgaris and D. brandisii were the toppers in terms of clump height, clump circumference and culm girth while B. tulda showed relatively poor growth for these parameters. Among the species, the highest internodal length was observed for D. brandisii and D. longispathus while B. tulda recorded the shortest internodal length. Number of culms per clump was highest for D. asper while it was the lowest for B. balcooa. Faster growth rendered by all the species except for B. tulda suggest their vast potential for integration in the farm lands of Kerala for enhancing the economic and ecological benefits to the farmers.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. vulgaris had better overall growth performance.

Taxon
B. vulgarisBambusa vulgarise0
Outcome
Overall growth performancee0
Direction
bettere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bambusa vulgaris
Bambusa vulgaris · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Overall growth performance was better for B. vulgaris, D. brandisii and D. longispathus.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–855 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

D. brandisii had better overall growth performance.

Taxon
D. brandisiiDendrocalamus brandisiie0
Outcome
Overall growth performancee0
Direction
bettere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dendrocalamus brandisii
Dendrocalamus brandisii · TaxonStickpen · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Overall growth performance was better for B. vulgaris, D. brandisii and D. longispathus.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–855 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

D. longispathus had better overall growth performance.

Taxon
D. longispathusDendrocalamus longispathuse0
Outcome
Overall growth performancee0
Direction
bettere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dendrocalamus longispathus
Dendrocalamus longispathus · TaxonYercaud-elango · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Overall growth performance was better for B. vulgaris, D. brandisii and D. longispathus.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–855 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. vulgaris ranked highest for clump height, circumference, and culm girth.

Taxon
B. vulgarisBambusa vulgarise0
Outcome
clump height, clump circumference and culm girthe0
Direction
topperse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bambusa vulgaris
Bambusa vulgaris · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B. vulgaris and D. brandisii were the toppers in terms of clump height, clump circumference and culm girth while B. tulda showed relatively poor growth for these parameters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–1043 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

D. brandisii ranked highest for clump height, circumference, and culm girth.

Taxon
D. brandisiiDendrocalamus brandisiie0
Outcome
clump height, clump circumference and culm girthe0
Direction
topperse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dendrocalamus brandisii
Dendrocalamus brandisii · TaxonStickpen · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B. vulgaris and D. brandisii were the toppers in terms of clump height, clump circumference and culm girth while B. tulda showed relatively poor growth for these parameters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–1043 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. tulda had relatively poor clump height, circumference, and culm girth.

Taxon
B. tuldaBambusa tuldae0
Outcome
clump height, clump circumference and culm girthe0
Direction
relatively poore0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bambusa tulda
Bambusa tulda · TaxonDvellakat · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B. vulgaris and D. brandisii were the toppers in terms of clump height, clump circumference and culm girth while B. tulda showed relatively poor growth for these parameters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–1043 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

D. brandisii had the highest internodal length.

Taxon
D. brandisiiDendrocalamus brandisiie0
Outcome
internodal lengthe0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dendrocalamus brandisii
Dendrocalamus brandisii · TaxonStickpen · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest internodal length was observed for D. brandisii and D. longispathus while B. tulda recorded the shortest internodal length.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1063–1198 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

D. longispathus had the highest internodal length.

Taxon
D. longispathusDendrocalamus longispathuse0
Outcome
internodal lengthe0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dendrocalamus longispathus
Dendrocalamus longispathus · TaxonYercaud-elango · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest internodal length was observed for D. brandisii and D. longispathus while B. tulda recorded the shortest internodal length.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1063–1198 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. tulda had the shortest internodal length.

Taxon
B. tuldaBambusa tuldae0
Outcome
internodal lengthe0
Direction
shorteste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bambusa tulda
Bambusa tulda · TaxonDvellakat · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest internodal length was observed for D. brandisii and D. longispathus while B. tulda recorded the shortest internodal length.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1063–1198 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

D. asper had the highest number of culms per clump.

Outcome
Number of culms per clumpe0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dendrocalamus asper
Dendrocalamus asper · TaxonDvellakat · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Number of culms per clump was highest for D. asper while it was the lowest for B. balcooa.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1199–1289 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. balcooa had the lowest number of culms per clump.

Taxon
B. balcooaBambusa balcooae0
Outcome
Number of culms per clumpe0
Direction
loweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bambusa balcooa
Bambusa balcooa · TaxonAlternativefiber · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Number of culms per clump was highest for D. asper while it was the lowest for B. balcooa.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1199–1289 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommended integrating the faster-growing species other than B. tulda into Kerala farms.

Taxon
all the species except for B. tuldae0
Outcome
integration in the farm lands of Keralae0
Setting
Keralae0

Verbatim

e0

“Faster growth rendered by all the species except for B. tulda suggest their vast potential for integration in the farm lands of Kerala for enhancing the economic and ecological benefits to the farmers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1290–1491 · show in text ↑