Abstract
The United States is the largest producer of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) however there is still a wide variation in yield among states. Potassium (K) is one of the key plant macronutrients that affect alfalfa yield and stand persistence. To the best of our knowledge, the evaluation of K rates on alfalfa forage yield and quality attributes has not been done in the United States. Thus, the main objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of K rates along with harvesting intervals (HI) and varieties on alfalfa dry matter yield (DMY), forage nutritive value, and soil K content. The experiment was carried out in a split-split plot with two HI (28 and 35-day after the first cut), two varieties (Hi–Gest 360: reduced-lignin and AFX 457: conventional), and four K application rates (0, 56, 112, and 168 kg K2O ha-1) in a randomized complete block with four replications. The results indicated that harvesting alfalfa at a shorter interval (28-day) resulted in higher dry matter yield and forage nutritive value than a longer harvest interval (35-day). Yield, nutritive values, and soil K content were, however, not significantly influenced by alfalfa variety and K rates. Further research is essential to quantify the actual trade-off between applied K and soil and plant K content in alfalfa production.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
A 28-day harvest interval raised dry matter yield relative to 35 days.
- Taxon
- alfalfa
Medicago sativae0 - Treatment
- shorter interval (28-day)e0
- Outcome
- dry matter yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- longer harvest interval (35-day)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“harvesting alfalfa at a shorter interval (28-day) resulted in higher dry matter yield and forage nutritive value than a longer harvest interval (35-day)”
Claim · model-written summary
A 28-day harvest interval raised forage nutritive value relative to 35 days.
- Taxon
- alfalfaMedicago sativae0
- Treatment
- shorter interval (28-day)e0
- Outcome
- forage nutritive valuee0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- longer harvest interval (35-day)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“harvesting alfalfa at a shorter interval (28-day) resulted in higher dry matter yield and forage nutritive value than a longer harvest interval (35-day)”
Claim · model-written summary
Variety and K rate did not significantly influence yield.
- Taxon
- alfalfaMedicago sativae0
- Treatment
- alfalfa variety and K ratese0
- Outcome
- Yielde0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Yield, nutritive values, and soil K content were, however, not significantly influenced by alfalfa variety and K rates”
Claim · model-written summary
Variety and K rate did not significantly influence nutritive values.
- Taxon
- alfalfaMedicago sativae0
- Treatment
- alfalfa variety and K ratese0
- Outcome
- nutritive valuese0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Yield, nutritive values, and soil K content were, however, not significantly influenced by alfalfa variety and K rates”
Claim · model-written summary
Variety and K rate did not significantly influence soil K content.
- Taxon
- alfalfaMedicago sativae0
- Treatment
- alfalfa variety and K ratese0
- Outcome
- soil K contente0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Yield, nutritive values, and soil K content were, however, not significantly influenced by alfalfa variety and K rates”
The same questions in other papers
potassium · yield · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Results differ
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
34 papers more in this group
See all 38 papers →potassium · nutrient: content · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.