Abstract
Method of application of irrigation to the crop plays one of the most crucial roles in plant growth, development and overall production of the crop. To study the effect of different types of irrigation methods on the yield of the pea (Pisum sativum L. var. PB-89) crop, a field experiment was conducted at the research farm of the Punjab Agricultural University, in the winter of 2016–17 and 2017–18. Five treatments, viz. drip irrigation on crop grown on level field (T1), drip irrigation on crop grown on ridges (T2), flood irrigation (T3) and furrow irrigation (T4) all at 100% ET level and rainfed irrigation (T5) were compared. Each method of irrigation application had a unique soil moisture pattern during the crop growing period. Soil microbial properties were also studied for different treatments and although there was non-significant difference in microbial population among treatments, there was significant difference of biologicalactivity of the microbes with respect to different irrigation treatments, as reflected by the recorded dehydrogenase activity of the soil. Population of microbes was maximum at flowering stage. Yield of the crop varied significantly with the method of irrigation used. Maximum yield was obtained under drip irrigation treatment
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation methods produced distinct soil moisture patterns.
- Taxon
- pea
Lathyrus oleraceust0 - Outcome
- unique soil moisture patterne0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Each method of irrigation application had a unique soil moisture pattern during the crop growing period.”
t0“pea (Pisum sativum)”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil microbial population did not differ significantly among irrigation treatments.
- Taxon
- peaLathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- treatmentse0
- Outcome
- microbial populatione0
- Direction
- non-significant differencee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“there was non-significant difference in microbial population among treatments”
t0“pea (Pisum sativum)”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil dehydrogenase activity differed significantly among irrigation treatments.
- Taxon
- peaLathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- different irrigation treatmentse0
- Outcome
- dehydrogenase activity of the soile0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“there was significant difference of biologicalactivity of the microbes with respect to different irrigation treatments, as reflected by the recorded dehydrogenase activity of the soil.”
t0“pea (Pisum sativum)”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil microbial population peaked at flowering.
- Taxon
- peaLathyrus oleraceust0
- Organ / stage
- flowering stagee0
- Outcome
- Population of microbese0
- Direction
- maximume0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Population of microbes was maximum at flowering stage.”
t0“pea (Pisum sativum)”
Claim · model-written summary
Pea yield varied significantly with irrigation method.
- Taxon
- peaLathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- method of irrigation usede0
- Outcome
- Yield of the crope0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Yield of the crop varied significantly with the method of irrigation used.”
t0“pea (Pisum sativum)”
Claim · model-written summary
Drip irrigation gave maximum pea yield.
- Taxon
- peaLathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- drip irrigation treatmente0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- Maximume0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Maximum yield was obtained under drip irrigation treatment”
t0“pea (Pisum sativum)”
The same questions in other papers
irrigation · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results differ
45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- negative
48 papers more in this group
See all 52 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.