Paper · 2022 · Assiut Journal of Agricultural Sciences/Assuit Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Effect of Pollination and Thinning Treatments on Fruiting of Some Date Palm Cultivars under New Valley Conditions.

essam mohamed abdelzaher radwan Radwan; Yosef mostafa sayed diab Diab; Hassan Ahmed Mohammed Ali ALI

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
1
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Pollination and thinning are considered among the important basic procedures for Madjool, Segae, and Khodry palms in terms of their effect on yield and fruit quality, in addition, regularizing the annual production of the date palm. The development of pollination technology, which leads to an acceptable level of fruits with the use of a small amount of pollen as well as economic thinning methods are necessary to improve the productivity of date palms, especially in dry conditions. This examination was carried out on Madjool, Segae, and Khodry date palms for the progressive seasons 2020 and 2021 in Dakhla Oasis, New Valley Governorate, Egypt. Pollination with 0.5 and 1.0 g of pollen grains supplemented with 100 gm sugar/L water as well as fruit thinning by removing 10, 20, 30, and 40% of fruit /spathe were done. The results showed that the use of pollen suspension at 0.5 g + 10% sugar solution as well as fruit thinning at 20 or 30% had a decrement percentage of bunch weight by about 5.65, 8.44 and 13.01 % over the control, as an average of the two studied seasons, respectively. The highest fruit weight (18.60, 19.48, and 20.87 g) were obtained from spraying the pollen suspension solution as well as removing 20 and 30% of the fruits, which resulted in an increment percentage of 20.00, 25. 68 and 34.65% over the control, respectively. Similarly, using pollen suspension and removing 20 or 30% of the fruits gave the highest percentages of TSS and sugar, while control gave the lowest percentage. It can be concluded that pollination with pollen grains at 0.5 g added to 100 gm sugar/L water or removing 30% of setting fruit produced a good crop with high fruit quality.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Date palm bunch weight decreased by about 5.65 percent under pollen suspension at 0.5 g + 10% sugar solution.

Taxon
Date PalmPhoenix dactyliferat0
Treatment
pollen suspension at 0.5 g + 10% sugar solutione0
Outcome
bunch weighte0
Direction
decremente0
Value
5.65e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phoenix dactylifera
Phoenix dactylifera · TaxonEJ Burns · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that the use of pollen suspension at 0.5 g + 10% sugar solution as well as fruit thinning at 20 or 30% had a decrement percentage of bunch weight by about 5.65, 8.44 and 13.01 % over the control, as an average of the two studied seasons, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–1093 · show in text ↑
t0

“Date Palm Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Date palm bunch weight decreased by about 8.44 percent under fruit thinning at 20.

Taxon
Date PalmPhoenix dactyliferat0
Treatment
fruit thinning at 20e0
Outcome
bunch weighte0
Direction
decremente0
Value
8.44e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phoenix dactylifera
Phoenix dactylifera · TaxonEJ Burns · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that the use of pollen suspension at 0.5 g + 10% sugar solution as well as fruit thinning at 20 or 30% had a decrement percentage of bunch weight by about 5.65, 8.44 and 13.01 % over the control, as an average of the two studied seasons, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–1093 · show in text ↑
t0

“Date Palm Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Date palm bunch weight decreased by about 13.01 % percent under 30%.

Taxon
Date PalmPhoenix dactyliferat0
Treatment
30%e0
Outcome
bunch weighte0
Direction
decremente0
Value
13.01 %e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phoenix dactylifera
Phoenix dactylifera · TaxonEJ Burns · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that the use of pollen suspension at 0.5 g + 10% sugar solution as well as fruit thinning at 20 or 30% had a decrement percentage of bunch weight by about 5.65, 8.44 and 13.01 % over the control, as an average of the two studied seasons, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–1093 · show in text ↑
t0

“Date Palm Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Date palm fruit weight under spraying the pollen suspension solution reached 18.60 g and increased 20.00 percent over control.

Taxon
Date PalmPhoenix dactyliferat0
Treatment
spraying the pollen suspension solutione0
Outcome
fruit weighte0
Direction
incremente0
Value
18.60e0
Qualifier
20.00e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phoenix dactylifera
Phoenix dactylifera · TaxonEJ Burns · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest fruit weight (18.60, 19.48, and 20.87 g) were obtained from spraying the pollen suspension solution as well as removing 20 and 30% of the fruits, which resulted in an increment percentage of 20.00, 25. 68 and 34.65% over the control, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1353 · show in text ↑
t0

“Date Palm Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Date palm fruit weight under removing 20 reached 19.48 g and increased 25. 68 percent over control.

Taxon
Date PalmPhoenix dactyliferat0
Treatment
removing 20e0
Outcome
fruit weighte0
Direction
incremente0
Value
19.48e0
Qualifier
25. 68e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phoenix dactylifera
Phoenix dactylifera · TaxonEJ Burns · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest fruit weight (18.60, 19.48, and 20.87 g) were obtained from spraying the pollen suspension solution as well as removing 20 and 30% of the fruits, which resulted in an increment percentage of 20.00, 25. 68 and 34.65% over the control, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1353 · show in text ↑
t0

“Date Palm Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Date palm fruit weight under 30% of the fruits reached 20.87 g g and increased 34.65% percent over control.

Taxon
Date PalmPhoenix dactyliferat0
Treatment
30% of the fruitse0
Outcome
fruit weighte0
Direction
incremente0
Value
20.87 ge0
Qualifier
34.65%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phoenix dactylifera
Phoenix dactylifera · TaxonEJ Burns · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest fruit weight (18.60, 19.48, and 20.87 g) were obtained from spraying the pollen suspension solution as well as removing 20 and 30% of the fruits, which resulted in an increment percentage of 20.00, 25. 68 and 34.65% over the control, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1353 · show in text ↑
t0

“Date Palm Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Date palm fruit TSS and sugar percentages were highest after pollen suspension.

Taxon
Date PalmPhoenix dactyliferat0
Treatment
pollen suspensione0
Outcome
percentages of TSS and sugare0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phoenix dactylifera
Phoenix dactylifera · TaxonEJ Burns · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Similarly, using pollen suspension and removing 20 or 30% of the fruits gave the highest percentages of TSS and sugar, while control gave the lowest percentage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1354–1514 · show in text ↑
t0

“Date Palm Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Date palm fruit TSS and sugar percentages were highest after removing 20.

Taxon
Date PalmPhoenix dactyliferat0
Treatment
removing 20e0
Outcome
percentages of TSS and sugare0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phoenix dactylifera
Phoenix dactylifera · TaxonEJ Burns · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Similarly, using pollen suspension and removing 20 or 30% of the fruits gave the highest percentages of TSS and sugar, while control gave the lowest percentage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1354–1514 · show in text ↑
t0

“Date Palm Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Date palm fruit TSS and sugar percentages were highest after 30% of the fruits.

Taxon
Date PalmPhoenix dactyliferat0
Treatment
30% of the fruitse0
Outcome
percentages of TSS and sugare0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phoenix dactylifera
Phoenix dactylifera · TaxonEJ Burns · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Similarly, using pollen suspension and removing 20 or 30% of the fruits gave the highest percentages of TSS and sugar, while control gave the lowest percentage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1354–1514 · show in text ↑
t0

“Date Palm Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–85 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that low pollen dose or 30% fruit thinning gives a good date palm crop with high fruit quality.

Taxon
Date PalmPhoenix dactyliferat0
Treatment
pollination with pollen grains at 0.5 g added to 100 gm sugar/L water or removing 30% of setting fruite0
Outcome
good crop with high fruit qualitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phoenix dactylifera
Phoenix dactylifera · TaxonEJ Burns · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It can be concluded that pollination with pollen grains at 0.5 g added to 100 gm sugar/L water or removing 30% of setting fruit produced a good crop with high fruit quality.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1515–1688 · show in text ↑
t0

“Date Palm Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–85 · show in text ↑

pruning · yield · Phoenix dactylifera (date palm)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 9 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

application · yield · Phoenix dactylifera (date palm)Positive and negative results

51 papers: 48 positive, 3 negative or no effect

47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.