Paper · 2022 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Improving the effects of drought priming against post-anthesis drought stress in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) using nitrogen

Attiq Ullah; Zhongwei Tian; Libing Xu; et al.

17
claims
55
verbatim quotes
36
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Water and nitrogen (N) deficiencies are the major limitations to crop production, particularly when they occur simultaneously. By supporting metabolism, even when tissue water capacity is lower, nitrogen and priming may reduce drought pressure on plants. Therefore, the current study investigates the impact of nitrogen and priming on wheat to minimize post-anthesis drought stress. Plant morphology, physiology, and biochemical changes were observed before, during, and after stress at the post-anthesis stage. The plants were exposed to three water levels, i.e., well watering (WW), water deficit (WD), and priming at jointing and water deficit (PJWD) at the post-anthesis stage, and two different nitrogen levels, i.e., N180 (N1) and N300 (N2). Nitrogen was applied in three splits, namely, sowing, jointing, and booting stages. The results showed that the photosynthesis of plants with N1 was significantly reduced under drought stress. Moreover, drought stress affected chlorophyll (Chl) fluorescence and water-related parameters (osmotic potential, leaf water potential, and relative water content), grain filling duration (GFD), and grain yield. In contrast, PJWD couple with high nitrogen treatment (N300 kg ha –1 ) induced the antioxidant activity of peroxidase (37.5%), superoxide dismutase (29.64%), and catalase (65.66%) in flag leaves, whereas the levels of hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 ) and superoxide anion radical (O 2 – ) declined by 58.56 and 66.64%, respectively. However, during the drought period, the primed plants under high nitrogen treatment (N300 kg ha –1 ) maintained higher Chl content, leaf water potential, and lowered lipid peroxidation (61%) (related to higher activities of ascorbate peroxidase and superoxide dismutase). Plants under high nitrogen treatment (N300 kg ha –1 ) showed deferred senescence, improved GFD, and grain yield. Consequently, the research showed that high nitrogen dose (N300 kg ha –1 ) played a synergistic role in enhancing the drought tolerance effects of priming under post-anthesis drought stress in wheat.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought significantly reduced photosynthesis in wheat plants with N1.

Treatment
drought stresse1
Outcome
photosynthesise1
Direction
significantly reducede1
Qualifier
plants with N1e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“photosynthesis of plants with N1 was significantly reduced under drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 860–939 · show in text ↑
t0

“drought stress in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress affected chlorophyll fluorescence in wheat.

Treatment
drought stresse2
Outcome
chlorophyll (Chl) fluorescencee2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“drought stress affected chlorophyll (Chl) fluorescence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 951–1005 · show in text ↑
t0

“drought stress in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress affected water-related parameters in wheat.

Treatment
drought stresse2
Outcome
water-related parameters (osmotic potential, leaf water potential, and relative water content)e3

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“drought stress affected chlorophyll (Chl) fluorescence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 951–1005 · show in text ↑
e3

“water-related parameters (osmotic potential, leaf water potential, and relative water content)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1010–1104 · show in text ↑
t0

“drought stress in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress affected grain filling duration in wheat.

Treatment
drought stresse2
Outcome
grain filling duration (GFD)e4

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“drought stress affected chlorophyll (Chl) fluorescence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 951–1005 · show in text ↑
e4

“grain filling duration (GFD), and grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1151 · show in text ↑
t0

“drought stress in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress affected grain yield in wheat.

Treatment
drought stresse2
Outcome
grain yielde4

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“drought stress affected chlorophyll (Chl) fluorescence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 951–1005 · show in text ↑
e4

“grain filling duration (GFD), and grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1151 · show in text ↑
t0

“drought stress in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PJWD with high nitrogen induced the antioxidant activity of peroxidase in flag leaves by 37.5%.

Organ / stage
flag leavese1
Treatment
PJWD couple with high nitrogen treatmente2
Outcome
antioxidant activity of peroxidasee0
Direction
inducede0
Value
37.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“induced the antioxidant activity of peroxidase (37.5%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1224–1278 · show in text ↑
e1

“catalase (65.66%) in flag leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1315–1347 · show in text ↑
e2

“PJWD couple with high nitrogen treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1166–1206 · show in text ↑
t0

“drought stress in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PJWD with high nitrogen induced superoxide dismutase activity in flag leaves by 29.64%.

Organ / stage
flag leavese2
Treatment
PJWD couple with high nitrogen treatmente3
Outcome
superoxide dismutasee0
Direction
inducede1
Value
29.64%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“superoxide dismutase (29.64%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1280–1309 · show in text ↑
e1

“induced the antioxidant activity of”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1224–1259 · show in text ↑
e2

“catalase (65.66%) in flag leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1315–1347 · show in text ↑
e3

“PJWD couple with high nitrogen treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1166–1206 · show in text ↑
t0

“drought stress in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PJWD with high nitrogen induced catalase activity in flag leaves by 65.66%.

Organ / stage
flag leavese0
Treatment
PJWD couple with high nitrogen treatmente2
Outcome
catalasee0
Direction
inducede1
Value
65.66%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“catalase (65.66%) in flag leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1315–1347 · show in text ↑
e1

“induced the antioxidant activity of”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1224–1259 · show in text ↑
e2

“PJWD couple with high nitrogen treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1166–1206 · show in text ↑
t0

“drought stress in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PJWD with high nitrogen lowered hydrogen peroxide levels by 58.56%.

Treatment
PJWD couple with high nitrogen treatmente2
Outcome
the levels of hydrogen peroxidee0
Direction
declinede1
Value
58.56e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the levels of hydrogen peroxide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1357–1388 · show in text ↑
e1

“declined by 58.56 and 66.64%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1438–1480 · show in text ↑
e2

“PJWD couple with high nitrogen treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1166–1206 · show in text ↑
t0

“drought stress in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PJWD with high nitrogen lowered superoxide anion radical levels by 66.64%.

Treatment
PJWD couple with high nitrogen treatmente2
Outcome
superoxide anion radicale1
Direction
declinede0
Value
66.64%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“declined by 58.56 and 66.64%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1438–1480 · show in text ↑
e1

“superoxide anion radical”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1404–1428 · show in text ↑
e2

“PJWD couple with high nitrogen treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1166–1206 · show in text ↑
t0

“drought stress in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Primed plants under high nitrogen maintained higher chlorophyll content and leaf water potential during drought.

Treatment
primed plants under high nitrogen treatmente0
Outcome
Chl content, leaf water potentiale1
Direction
highere1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the primed plants under high nitrogen treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1518–1565 · show in text ↑
e1

“maintained higher Chl content, leaf water potential”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1583–1634 · show in text ↑
t0

“drought stress in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Primed plants under high nitrogen lowered lipid peroxidation by 61%.

Treatment
primed plants under high nitrogen treatmente0
Outcome
lipid peroxidatione1
Direction
lowerede1
Value
61%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the primed plants under high nitrogen treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1518–1565 · show in text ↑
e1

“lowered lipid peroxidation (61%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1640–1672 · show in text ↑
t0

“drought stress in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–86 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lipid peroxidation was lowered in association with higher ascorbate peroxidase and superoxide dismutase activities.

Gene
ascorbate peroxidase and superoxide dismutasee1
Outcome
lipid peroxidatione0
Direction
lowerede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lowered lipid peroxidation (61%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1640–1672 · show in text ↑
e1

“related to higher activities of ascorbate peroxidase and superoxide dismutase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1674–1751 · show in text ↑
t0

“drought stress in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High nitrogen treatment deferred senescence in wheat.

Treatment
Plants under high nitrogen treatmente0
Outcome
senescencee1
Direction
deferrede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants under high nitrogen treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1754–1790 · show in text ↑
e1

“showed deferred senescence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1808–1834 · show in text ↑
t0

“drought stress in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High nitrogen treatment improved grain filling duration in wheat.

Treatment
Plants under high nitrogen treatmente0
Outcome
GFDe1
Direction
improvede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants under high nitrogen treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1754–1790 · show in text ↑
e1

“improved GFD, and grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1836–1865 · show in text ↑
t0

“drought stress in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High nitrogen treatment improved grain yield in wheat.

Treatment
Plants under high nitrogen treatmente0
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
improvede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants under high nitrogen treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1754–1790 · show in text ↑
e1

“improved GFD, and grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1836–1865 · show in text ↑
t0

“drought stress in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

High nitrogen dose played a synergistic role in enhancing the drought tolerance effects of priming in wheat.

Treatment
high nitrogen dosee1
Outcome
drought tolerance effects of priminge0
Direction
enhancinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“played a synergistic role in enhancing the drought tolerance effects of priming”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1942–2021 · show in text ↑
e1

“high nitrogen dose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1906–1924 · show in text ↑
t0

“drought stress in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–86 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · tolerance: abiotic · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 7 positive, 4 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

nitrogen · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 16 positive, 3 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

nitrogen · physiology: oxidative · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 17 positive, 5 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

nitrogen · quality: postharvest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 21 positive, 7 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

seed treatment · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 30 positive, 2 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

seed treatment · physiology: oxidative · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

48 papers: 46 positive, 2 negative or no effect

45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

drought · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

79 papers: 49 positive, 30 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

75 papers more in this group

See all 79 papers →

nitrogen · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

101 papers: 88 positive, 13 negative or no effect

87 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

97 papers more in this group

See all 101 papers →

8 of 15 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.