Paper · 2022 · Indian Journal of Biochemistry and Biophysics

Effect of waterlogging on physiological traits and yield in black gram (Vigna mungo L.) in field condition

10
claims
24
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Waterlogging is an important abiotic factor affecting crop productivity worldwide. Black gram (Vigna mungo L.) is very sensitive to waterlogged conditions. A field experiment was conducted in randomized complete block design to evaluate three black gram genotypes for waterlogging tolerance. Stress was imposed by maintaining the water level above the soil surface for 10 days after 30 days of sowing. Different physiological parameters including chlorophyll (Chl), chlorophyll fluorescence, normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), sugars, along with the yield per plant and thousand grain weight (TW) were recorded in control and stressed plants. Results showed that NDVI, Chl, chlorophyll fluorescence, sugars, seed yield and TW reduced significantly during stress. Stress susceptibility index (SSI) for grain yield varied from 0.32 to 2.38. Linear correlation study showed that SSI was negatively correlated with NDVI (0.43),Chl (0.68) and TW (0.42) and grain yield (0.96). NDVI and sugars were correlated to TW under stress. IC530491 and IC559933 (SSI < 0.5) were waterlogging tolerant under field conditions. The study concluded that identified black gram lines may be utilized as trait donors in breeding program.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging significantly reduced NDVI, chlorophyll and chlorophyll fluorescence in black gram.

Taxon
black gram (Vigna mungo L.)Vigna mungot0
Treatment
maintaining the water level above the soil surface for 10 dayse2
Outcome
NDVI, Chl, chlorophyll fluorescencee1
Direction
reducede1
Comparator
controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in black gram (Vigna mungo L.) in field condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–106 · show in text ↑
e1

“Results showed that NDVI, Chl, chlorophyll fluorescence, sugars, seed yield and TW reduced significantly during stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 655–773 · show in text ↑
e2

“Stress was imposed by maintaining the water level above the soil surface for 10 days after 30 days of sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 292–400 · show in text ↑
e3

“were recorded in control and stressed plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–653 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging significantly reduced sugars, seed yield and thousand grain weight in black gram.

Taxon
black gram (Vigna mungo L.)Vigna mungot0
Treatment
maintaining the water level above the soil surface for 10 dayse2
Outcome
sugars, seed yield and TWe1
Direction
reducede1
Comparator
controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in black gram (Vigna mungo L.) in field condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–106 · show in text ↑
e1

“Results showed that NDVI, Chl, chlorophyll fluorescence, sugars, seed yield and TW reduced significantly during stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 655–773 · show in text ↑
e2

“Stress was imposed by maintaining the water level above the soil surface for 10 days after 30 days of sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 292–400 · show in text ↑
e3

“were recorded in control and stressed plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–653 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stress susceptibility index for grain yield ranged from 0.32 to 2.38 among black gram genotypes under waterlogging.

Taxon
black gram (Vigna mungo L.)Vigna mungot0
Outcome
Stress susceptibility index (SSI) for grain yielde1
Value
0.32 to 2.38e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in black gram (Vigna mungo L.) in field condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–106 · show in text ↑
e1

“Stress susceptibility index (SSI) for grain yield varied from 0.32 to 2.38”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–849 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SSI was negatively correlated with NDVI (0.43).

Taxon
black gram (Vigna mungo L.)Vigna mungot0
Outcome
SSIe1
Direction
negatively correlatede1
Value
0.43e1
Comparator
NDVIe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in black gram (Vigna mungo L.) in field condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–106 · show in text ↑
e1

“Linear correlation study showed that SSI was negatively correlated with NDVI (0.43),Chl (0.68) and TW (0.42) and grain yield (0.96)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–982 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SSI was negatively correlated with chlorophyll (0.68).

Taxon
black gram (Vigna mungo L.)Vigna mungot0
Outcome
SSIe1
Direction
negatively correlatede1
Value
0.68e1
Comparator
Chle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in black gram (Vigna mungo L.) in field condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–106 · show in text ↑
e1

“Linear correlation study showed that SSI was negatively correlated with NDVI (0.43),Chl (0.68) and TW (0.42) and grain yield (0.96)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–982 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SSI was negatively correlated with thousand grain weight (0.42).

Taxon
black gram (Vigna mungo L.)Vigna mungot0
Outcome
SSIe1
Direction
negatively correlatede1
Value
0.42e1
Comparator
TWe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in black gram (Vigna mungo L.) in field condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–106 · show in text ↑
e1

“Linear correlation study showed that SSI was negatively correlated with NDVI (0.43),Chl (0.68) and TW (0.42) and grain yield (0.96)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–982 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SSI was negatively correlated with grain yield (0.96).

Taxon
black gram (Vigna mungo L.)Vigna mungot0
Outcome
SSIe1
Direction
negatively correlatede1
Value
0.96e1
Comparator
grain yielde1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in black gram (Vigna mungo L.) in field condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–106 · show in text ↑
e1

“Linear correlation study showed that SSI was negatively correlated with NDVI (0.43),Chl (0.68) and TW (0.42) and grain yield (0.96)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–982 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NDVI and sugars were correlated with thousand grain weight under stress.

Taxon
black gram (Vigna mungo L.)Vigna mungot0
Treatment
under stresse1
Outcome
TWe1
Comparator
NDVI and sugarse1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in black gram (Vigna mungo L.) in field condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–106 · show in text ↑
e1

“NDVI and sugars were correlated to TW under stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1034 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotypes IC530491 and IC559933 (SSI below 0.5) were waterlogging tolerant under field conditions.

Taxon
black gram (Vigna mungo L.)Vigna mungot0
Material
IC530491 and IC559933e1
Outcome
waterlogging tolerante1
Qualifier
SSI < 0.5e1
Setting
field conditionse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in black gram (Vigna mungo L.) in field condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–106 · show in text ↑
e1

“IC530491 and IC559933 (SSI < 0.5) were waterlogging tolerant under field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1036–1119 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Identified black gram lines may be used as trait donors in breeding.

Taxon
black gram (Vigna mungo L.)Vigna mungot0
Outcome
utilized as trait donors in breeding programe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in black gram (Vigna mungo L.) in field condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–106 · show in text ↑
e1

“The study concluded that identified black gram lines may be utilized as trait donors in breeding program”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1121–1225 · show in text ↑

irrigation · physiology: photosynthesis · Vigna mungo (black gram)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

irrigation · yield · Vigna mungo (black gram)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 20 positive, 1 negative or no effect

20 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.