Paper · 2018 · Open Access Journal of Agricultural Research

The Effect of Bio and Inorganic Fertilizer on Yield, Nutrient Uptake and Economics of Mungbean (Vigna Radiata L. Wilczek) Varieties in Ethiopia

Fikru Mekonnen

7
claims
12
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The wide use of mungbean (Vigna radiate) as food crops forages and green manure is mainly associated with their ability to establish symbiotic association with root nodulating rhizobia. The field experiment was conducted at Kemisie Zone Dawachefa district, Ethiopian in 2017 was designed to study the effect of different levels of bio fertilizers and phosphorus on yield, nutrient uptake and economics of mungbean varieties for improving the overall productivity of the crop. The experiment was laid out with split plot design with three replications. Three levels of Rhizobium inoculation rates (0, 400g and 500g) and three level of phosphorus (0, 23 and 46 kg P2O5 ha-1) as the sub-plot factor and two different varieties as main plot, thereby, making eighteen treatment combinations. The result showed that Rhizobium and phosphorous had significant (p < 0.05) effect on morphological and phonological traits. An increase in the rate of application of Rhizobium and phosphorous linearly increase agronomic, yield and yield component traits. The maximum seed yield (1808 kg ha-1) was obtained when we apply 500g Rhizobium inoculants and 0 kg P2O5 ha-1. Thus the application of Rhizobium inoculants at 500g alone or Rhizobium inoculants 500g combined with phosphorus application at the rate of 23 kg P2O5 ha-1 were economically optimum level for harvesting the highest yield of mungbean for the region. Despite significant increases observed in yield, nutrient uptake, economic response to the recommended rates of bio fertilizer, future studies should focus on multi-locations and seasons to arrive at conclusive results.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium and phosphorus significantly affected morphological and phenological traits.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
Rhizobium and phosphorouse0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
morphological and phonological traitse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The result showed that Rhizobium and phosphorous had significant (p < 0.05) effect on morphological and phonological traits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–911 · show in text ↑
t0

“mungbean”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 86–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing Rhizobium and phosphorus rates increased agronomic, yield and yield component traits.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
Rhizobium and phosphorouse0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
agronomic, yield and yield component traitse0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An increase in the rate of application of Rhizobium and phosphorous linearly increase agronomic, yield and yield component traits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 912–1042 · show in text ↑
t0

“mungbean”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 86–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The maximum seed yield was 1808 kg ha-1 with 500g Rhizobium inoculant and no phosphorus.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
500g Rhizobium inoculants and 0 kg P2O5 ha-1e0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
1808 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum seed yield (1808 kg ha-1) was obtained when we apply 500g Rhizobium inoculants and 0 kg P2O5 ha-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1043–1153 · show in text ↑
t0

“mungbean”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 86–94 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Applying 500g Rhizobium inoculant alone was economically optimal for high mungbean yield.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
Rhizobium inoculants at 500g alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Thus the application of Rhizobium inoculants at 500g alone or Rhizobium inoculants 500g combined with phosphorus application at the rate of 23 kg P2O5 ha-1 were economically optimum level for harvesting the highest yield of mungbean for the region.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1154–1402 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Combining 500g Rhizobium inoculant with 23 kg P2O5 ha-1 was economically optimal for high mungbean yield.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
Rhizobium inoculants 500g combined with phosphorus application at the rate of 23 kg P2O5 ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rhizobium inoculants 500g combined with phosphorus application at the rate of 23 kg P2O5 ha-1 were economically optimum level for harvesting the highest yield of mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1216–1386 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Recommended biofertilizer rates significantly increased yield and nutrient uptake.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
recommended rates of bio fertilizere0
Outcome
yield, nutrient uptakee0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Despite significant increases observed in yield, nutrient uptake, economic response to the recommended rates of bio fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1403–1529 · show in text ↑
t0

“mungbean”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 86–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Recommended biofertilizer rates significantly increased economic response.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
recommended rates of bio fertilizere0
Outcome
economic responsee0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Despite significant increases observed in yield, nutrient uptake, economic response to the recommended rates of bio fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1403–1529 · show in text ↑
t0

“mungbean”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 86–94 · show in text ↑

Rhizobium · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results differ

123 papers: 121 positive, 2 negative or no effect

120 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

119 papers more in this group

See all 123 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results differ

179 papers: 175 positive, 4 negative or no effect

174 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

175 papers more in this group

See all 179 papers →

inoculation · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

184 papers: 179 positive, 5 negative or no effect

178 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

180 papers more in this group

See all 184 papers →

fertilization · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

375 papers: 364 positive, 11 negative or no effect

363 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

371 papers more in this group

See all 375 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.