Paper · 2021 · Микробные биотехнологии фундаментальные и прикладные аспекты

ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS OF THE APPLICATION OF BIOLOGICAL PREPARATIONS IN THE APPLE PROTECTION SYSTEM IN THE RIGHT BANK FOREST STEPPE OF UKRAINE

A. N. TKALENKO; V. I. KRUTYAKOVA; V. YA. KHODORCHUK

13
claims
31
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Based on long-term monitoring of the phytosanitary state of apple plantations in the Right-Bank Forest-Steppe of Ukraine, the species composition of diseases was established, among which scab (Venturia inaegualis (Cooke) Wind) – 32.4 % and fruit rot (Monilia fructigena Pers.) – 23.7 %, mealy dew (Podosphaera leucotriche) – 21.7 %; bacteriosis (Erwinia amylovora) – 17.8 %. The features of the use of tank mixtures of microbiological fungicides based on fungal and bacterial bioagents for the protection of apple trees from diseases have been studied. It has been established that the microbiological preparation “Glyocladin BT” (Trichoderma (Gliocladium) virens) with a consumption rate (6.0 l/ha) provides a reduction in leaf infestation from scab and powdery mildew by 64.0–66.3 %, fruits by 31.4–40.0 %, the weight of fruits increases by 13.0–18.4 % and the yield of standard environmentally safe products by 12.0 and 14.2 %, and the yield by 4.6–5.8 t/ha. Microbiological preparations “Gaupsin BT” and “Pentafag-S” reduce the infection of apple leaves and fruits with bacterial burns by 56.3–70.0 %; fruit rot – by 66.8–80.0 %, while the yield and standard of apple fruits in the experimental variants exceed the control by 0.6–1.1 t/ha and 13.6–18.1 %, respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Scab represented 32.4% of apple plantation diseases.

Interactor
Venturia inaegualis (Cooke) Winde0pathogen
Outcome
scabe0
Value
32.4 %e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“scab (Venturia inaegualis (Cooke) Wind) – 32.4 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–235 · show in text ↑
t0

“APPLE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–80 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit rot represented 23.7% of apple plantation diseases.

Interactor
Monilia fructigena Pers.Monilia fructigenae0pathogen
Outcome
fruit rote0
Value
23.7 %e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Monilia fructigena
Monilia fructigena · InteractorJerzy Opioła · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit rot (Monilia fructigena Pers.) – 23.7 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 240–285 · show in text ↑
t0

“APPLE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–80 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mealy dew represented 21.7% of apple plantation diseases.

Interactor
Podosphaera leucotrichee0pathogen
Outcome
mealy dewe0
Value
21.7 %e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mealy dew (Podosphaera leucotriche) – 21.7 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 287–331 · show in text ↑
t0

“APPLE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–80 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacteriosis represented 17.8% of apple plantation diseases.

Interactor
Erwinia amylovoraErwinia amylovorae0pathogen
Outcome
bacteriosise0
Value
17.8 %e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Erwinia amylovora
Erwinia amylovora · InteractorSebastian Stabinger · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“bacteriosis (Erwinia amylovora) – 17.8 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 333–373 · show in text ↑
t0

“APPLE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyocladin BT reduced apple leaf scab and powdery mildew infestation by 64.0–66.3%.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticae1
Treatment
Glyocladin BTe0
Interactor
Trichoderma (Gliocladium) virensGliocladiume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
leaf infestation from scab and powdery mildewe0
Direction
reductione0
Value
64.0–66.3 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Gliocladium
Gliocladium · InteractorScot Nelson · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

““Glyocladin BT” (Trichoderma (Gliocladium) virens) with a consumption rate (6.0 l/ha) provides a reduction in leaf infestation from scab and powdery mildew by 64.0–66.3 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 614–784 · show in text ↑
t0

“APPLE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“the protection of apple trees from diseases have been studied.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 490–552 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyocladin BT reduced fruit infestation by 31.4–40.0%.

Treatment
Glyocladin BTe1
Interactor
Trichoderma (Gliocladium) virensGliocladiume2biocontrol_agentt0
Outcome
fruitse0
Value
31.4–40.0 %e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Gliocladium
Gliocladium · InteractorScot Nelson · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruits by 31.4–40.0 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–807 · show in text ↑
t0

“APPLE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–80 · show in text ↑
e1

““Glyocladin BT” (Trichoderma (Gliocladium) virens) with a consumption rate (6.0 l/ha) provides a reduction in leaf infestation from scab and powdery mildew by 64.0–66.3 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 614–784 · show in text ↑
e2

““Glyocladin BT” (Trichoderma (Gliocladium) virens) with a consumption rate (6.0 l/ha) provides a reduction in leaf infestation from scab and powdery mildew by 64.0–66.3 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 614–784 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyocladin BT increased fruit weight by 13.0–18.4%.

Treatment
Glyocladin BTe1
Outcome
weight of fruitse0
Direction
increasese0
Value
13.0–18.4 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the weight of fruits increases by 13.0–18.4 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–854 · show in text ↑
t0

“APPLE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–80 · show in text ↑
e1

““Glyocladin BT” (Trichoderma (Gliocladium) virens) with a consumption rate (6.0 l/ha) provides a reduction in leaf infestation from scab and powdery mildew by 64.0–66.3 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 614–784 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyocladin BT increased standard product yield by 12.0 and 14.2%.

Treatment
Glyocladin BTe1
Outcome
yield of standard environmentally safe productse0
Value
12.0 and 14.2 %e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the yield of standard environmentally safe products by 12.0 and 14.2 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–929 · show in text ↑
t0

“APPLE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–80 · show in text ↑
e1

““Glyocladin BT” (Trichoderma (Gliocladium) virens) with a consumption rate (6.0 l/ha) provides a reduction in leaf infestation from scab and powdery mildew by 64.0–66.3 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 614–784 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyocladin BT increased yield by 4.6–5.8 t/ha.

Treatment
Glyocladin BTe1
Outcome
yielde0
Value
4.6–5.8 t/hae0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the yield by 4.6–5.8 t/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–960 · show in text ↑
t0

“APPLE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–80 · show in text ↑
e1

““Glyocladin BT” (Trichoderma (Gliocladium) virens) with a consumption rate (6.0 l/ha) provides a reduction in leaf infestation from scab and powdery mildew by 64.0–66.3 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 614–784 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gaupsin BT and Pentafag-S reduced bacterial burn infection by 56.3–70.0%.

Treatment
Gaupsin BTe0
Outcome
infection of apple leaves and fruits with bacterial burnse0
Direction
reducee0
Value
56.3–70.0 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

““Gaupsin BT” and “Pentafag-S” reduce the infection of apple leaves and fruits with bacterial burns by 56.3–70.0 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gaupsin BT and Pentafag-S reduced apple fruit rot by 66.8–80.0%.

Treatment
Gaupsin BTe1
Interactor
Monilia fructigena Pers.Monilia fructigenae2pathogent0
Outcome
fruit rote0
Value
66.8–80.0 %e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Monilia fructigena
Monilia fructigena · InteractorJerzy Opioła · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit rot – by 66.8–80.0 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1132 · show in text ↑
t0

“APPLE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–80 · show in text ↑
e1

““Gaupsin BT” and “Pentafag-S” reduce the infection of apple leaves and fruits with bacterial burns by 56.3–70.0 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1104 · show in text ↑
e2

“fruit rot (Monilia fructigena Pers.) – 23.7 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 240–285 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield in experimental variants exceeded control by 0.6–1.1 t/ha.

Treatment
experimental variantse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
exceede0
Value
0.6–1.1 t/hae0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the yield and standard of apple fruits in the experimental variants exceed the control by 0.6–1.1 t/ha and 13.6–18.1 %, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1140–1272 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Standard apple fruit production in experimental variants exceeded control by 13.6–18.1%.

Treatment
experimental variantse0
Outcome
standard of apple fruitse0
Direction
exceede0
Value
13.6–18.1 %e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the yield and standard of apple fruits in the experimental variants exceed the control by 0.6–1.1 t/ha and 13.6–18.1 %, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1140–1272 · show in text ↑

transgenic · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.