Paper · 1973 · Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science

Effect of Manganese Soil and Seed Treatments on Growth and Yield of Peas1

W. C. Anderson; J. B. Carstens

3
claims
5
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract A broadcast MnSO 4 treatment of 38 Kg Mn/ha resulted in 2½-fold increase in both plant growth and shelled pea yields of ‘Darkskin Perfection’ peas. Pods per plant and peas per pod, 2 components of the yield equation, were reduced by Mn deficiency. Seed treatments of Mn EDTA were not effective in correcting the deficiency.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Broadcast MnSO4 at 38 kg Mn/ha increased plant growth and shelled pea yield about 2.5-fold.

Material
Darkskin Perfectione1
Treatment
broadcast MnSO 4 treatment of 38 Kg Mn/hae1
Outcome
plant growth and shelled pea yieldse1
Direction
increasee1
Value
2½-folde1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“A broadcast MnSO 4 treatment of 38 Kg Mn/ha resulted in 2½-fold increase in both plant growth and shelled pea yields of ‘Darkskin Perfection’ peas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–155 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mn deficiency reduced pods per plant and peas per pod, two components of the yield equation.

Treatment
Mn deficiencye2
Outcome
Pods per plant and peas per pode2
Direction
reducede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“A broadcast MnSO 4 treatment of 38 Kg Mn/ha resulted in 2½-fold increase in both plant growth and shelled pea yields of ‘Darkskin Perfection’ peas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–155 · show in text ↑
e2

“Pods per plant and peas per pod, 2 components of the yield equation, were reduced by Mn deficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 157–255 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed treatment with Mn EDTA was not effective in correcting the manganese deficiency.

Treatment
Seed treatments of Mn EDTAe3
Outcome
correcting the deficiencye3

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“A broadcast MnSO 4 treatment of 38 Kg Mn/ha resulted in 2½-fold increase in both plant growth and shelled pea yields of ‘Darkskin Perfection’ peas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–155 · show in text ↑
e3

“Seed treatments of Mn EDTA were not effective in correcting the deficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 257–331 · show in text ↑

manganese atom · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results differ

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

This paper is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

transplanting · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 5 positive, 4 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.