Paper · 1978 · Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science

Silver Ion Inhibits Ethylene Synthesis and Action in Ripening Fruits1

Mikal E. Saltveit; Kent J. Bradford; David R. Dilley

10
claims
18
verbatim quotes
42
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract Ag(I), applied in aqueous solution as AgNO 3 , inhibited ethylene synthesis and ripening of mature green banana fruit slices and pericarp discs of mature green tomato fruit. It also inhibited ethylene production by cortical tissue from post-climacteric apples. Concentrations of Ag(I) which reduced ethylene synthesis had an inconsistent effect on CO 2 production: no effect on banana slices (1.0 m m Ag + ), stimulation in apple tissue (0.1 m m Ag + ), and inhibition in tomato tissue (0.3 m m Ag + ). This was accompanied by a slight amount of tissue necrosis at these concentrations. Of the 7 metallic salts tested, only Ag(I) inhibited ripening and ethylene synthesis at observed non-phytotoxic levels. Inhibition of ripening and ethylene synthesis by Ag(I) was evident in tissue treated with sufficient exogenous ethylene to elicit both responses in control tissue. The inability of applied ethylene to overcome the inhibitory effect of Ag(I) suggests that the silver ion may interfere with the primary action of ethylene in the tissue.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ag(I) inhibited ethylene synthesis and ripening in banana slices.

Taxon
bananae0
Organ / stage
mature green banana fruit slicese0
Treatment
Ag(I)e0
Outcome
ethylene synthesis and ripeninge0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Ag(I), applied in aqueous solution as AgNO 3 , inhibited ethylene synthesis and ripening of mature green banana fruit slices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ag(I) inhibited ethylene synthesis and ripening in tomato pericarp discs.

Organ / stage
pericarp discs of mature green tomato fruite0
Treatment
Ag(I)e0
Outcome
ethylene synthesis and ripeninge0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ag(I), applied in aqueous solution as AgNO 3 , inhibited ethylene synthesis and ripening of mature green banana fruit slices and pericarp discs of mature green tomato fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–181 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ag(I) inhibited ethylene production by post-climacteric apple cortical tissue.

Organ / stage
cortical tissuee0
Treatment
Silver Iont0
Outcome
ethylene productione0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It also inhibited ethylene production by cortical tissue from post-climacteric apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 183–268 · show in text ↑
t0

“Silver Ion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 1.0 m m Ag +, banana CO 2 production was unchanged.

Taxon
bananae0
Treatment
1.0 m m Ag +e0
Outcome
CO 2 productione1
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“no effect on banana slices (1.0 m m Ag + )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–416 · show in text ↑
e1

“effect on CO 2 production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 347–372 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 0.1 m m Ag +, CO 2 production was stimulated in apple tissue.

Treatment
0.1 m m Ag +e0
Outcome
CO 2 productione1
Direction
stimulatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stimulation in apple tissue (0.1 m m Ag + )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 418–461 · show in text ↑
e1

“effect on CO 2 production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 347–372 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 0.3 m m Ag +, CO 2 production was inhibited in tomato tissue.

Treatment
0.3 m m Ag +e0
Outcome
CO 2 productione1
Direction
inhibitione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inhibition in tomato tissue (0.3 m m Ag + )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 467–510 · show in text ↑
e1

“effect on CO 2 production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 347–372 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

These silver ion concentrations caused slight tissue necrosis.

Taxon
Fruitst0
Treatment
these concentrationse0
Outcome
tissue necrosise0
Qualifier
slight amounte0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

t0

“Ripening Fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–68 · show in text ↑
e0

“This was accompanied by a slight amount of tissue necrosis at these concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 512–594 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Of seven metallic salts, only Ag(I) inhibited ripening and ethylene synthesis at non-phytotoxic levels.

Taxon
Fruitst0
Treatment
Ag(I)e0
Outcome
ripening and ethylene synthesise0
Direction
inhibitede0
Qualifier
non-phytotoxic levelse0
Comparator
7 metallic saltse0

Verbatim

t0

“Ripening Fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–68 · show in text ↑
e0

“Of the 7 metallic salts tested, only Ag(I) inhibited ripening and ethylene synthesis at observed non-phytotoxic levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–714 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Exogenous ethylene did not overcome Ag(I) inhibition of ripening and ethylene synthesis.

Taxon
Fruitst0
Treatment
Ag(I)e0
Outcome
ripening and ethylene synthesise0
Direction
Inhibitione0
Qualifier
sufficient exogenous ethylenee0
Comparator
control tissuee0

Verbatim

t0

“Ripening Fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–68 · show in text ↑
e0

“Inhibition of ripening and ethylene synthesis by Ag(I) was evident in tissue treated with sufficient exogenous ethylene to elicit both responses in control tissue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 716–878 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silver ion may interfere with primary ethylene action in fruit tissue.

Taxon
Fruitst0
Compound
silver ione0
Outcome
primary action of ethylenee0

Verbatim

t0

“Ripening Fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–68 · show in text ↑
e0

“the silver ion may interfere with the primary action of ethylene in the tissue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1049 · show in text ↑

silver atom · physiology: hormones · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 2 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.