Abstract
Abstract Staminate flowers were induced in a gynoecious line (MSU 394G) and the pistillate phase was delayed in a monoecious cultivar (‘Sumter’) of cucumber ( Cucumis sativus L.) with 2 phthalimide derivatives, 1-(3-chlorophthalimido)-cyclohexanecarboxamide and 1-(1-cyclohexene-1,2-dicarboximido)-cyclohexanecarboxamide. Single and multiple foliar sprays at 1000 mg liter −1 during expansion of the first true leaf (5–7 cm in width) delayed flowering as indexed by days from seeding to anthesis and the node of the first pistillate flower in monoecious ‘Sumter’. Repeat applications induced staminate flowers in gynoecious MSU 394G and staminate flower production continued over a wide range of nodes. Marked differences in response to the phthalimides appeared to be related to the season in which the experiments were performed. The greatest number of staminate flowers was induced when the gynoecious plants were exposed to an 8-hour photoperiod early in plant development and then grown under a 14-hour photoperiod.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Two phthalimide derivatives induced staminate flowers in gynoecious cucumber MSU 394G.
- Taxon
- cucumber
Cucumis sativuse0 - Material
- MSU 394Ge0
- Treatment
- 2 phthalimide derivativese0
- Outcome
- Staminate flowers were inducede0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Staminate flowers were induced in a gynoecious line (MSU 394G) and the pistillate phase was delayed in a monoecious cultivar (‘Sumter’) of cucumber ( Cucumis sativus L.) with 2 phthalimide derivatives, 1-(3-chlorophthalimido)-cyclohexanecarboxamide and 1-(1-cyclohexene-1,2-dicarboximido)-cyclohexanecarboxamide.”
Claim · model-written summary
Two phthalimide derivatives delayed the pistillate phase in monoecious cucumber Sumter.
- Taxon
- cucumberCucumis sativuse0
- Material
- ‘Sumter’e0
- Treatment
- 2 phthalimide derivativese0
- Outcome
- pistillate phasee0
- Direction
- delayede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Staminate flowers were induced in a gynoecious line (MSU 394G) and the pistillate phase was delayed in a monoecious cultivar (‘Sumter’) of cucumber ( Cucumis sativus L.) with 2 phthalimide derivatives, 1-(3-chlorophthalimido)-cyclohexanecarboxamide and 1-(1-cyclohexene-1,2-dicarboximido)-cyclohexanecarboxamide.”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar sprays at 1000 mg per liter delayed anthesis and first pistillate flower node in Sumter.
- Taxon
- cucumberCucumis sativust0
- Material
- ‘Sumter’e0
- Treatment
- foliar sprays at 1000 mg liter −1e0
- Outcome
- days from seeding to anthesis and the node of the first pistillate flowere0
- Direction
- delayede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Single and multiple foliar sprays at 1000 mg liter −1 during expansion of the first true leaf (5–7 cm in width) delayed flowering as indexed by days from seeding to anthesis and the node of the first pistillate flower in monoecious ‘Sumter’.”
t0“Cucumbers”
Claim · model-written summary
Repeated applications induced persistent staminate flower production over many nodes in MSU 394G.
- Taxon
- cucumberCucumis sativust0
- Material
- MSU 394Ge0
- Treatment
- Repeat applicationse0
- Outcome
- staminate flower production continued over a wide range of nodese0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Repeat applications induced staminate flowers in gynoecious MSU 394G and staminate flower production continued over a wide range of nodes.”
t0“Cucumbers”
Claim · model-written summary
Responses to phthalimides differed markedly by experimental season.
- Taxon
- cucumberCucumis sativust0
- Outcome
- response to the phthalimidese0
- Setting
- season in which the experiments were performede0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Marked differences in response to the phthalimides appeared to be related to the season in which the experiments were performed.”
t0“Cucumbers”
Claim · model-written summary
Early eight-hour then 14-hour photoperiod produced the greatest number of staminate flowers in gynoecious plants.
- Taxon
- cucumberCucumis sativust0
- Treatment
- 8-hour photoperiod early in plant development and then grown under a 14-hour photoperiode0
- Outcome
- number of staminate flowerse0
- Direction
- greateste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The greatest number of staminate flowers was induced when the gynoecious plants were exposed to an 8-hour photoperiod early in plant development and then grown under a 14-hour photoperiod.”
t0“Cucumbers”
The same questions in other papers
light · phenology · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.