Paper · 1983 · Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science

Effects of PEG-induced Water Stress on Calcium Uptake in Peach Seedlings

Melanie F. Haber; Eric Young; M. Faust

8
claims
13
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract Polyethylene glycol (PEG-4000)-induced water stress (—0.5 to —7.5 bars) reduced shoot and root growth, water use, and stem 45 Ca in seedlings of peach ( Prunus persica (L.) Batsch). Sucrose feeding through a leaf did not affect stem 45 Ca with or without osmotic stress. 45 Calcium uptake per milligram water used was not different at different solution osmotic potentials. A split-root study, with half the root system receiving 45 Ca and/or PEG, showed that if 45 Ca was supplied only to the water-stressed root half, 45 Ca uptake into stems was low regardless of whether the other root half was stressed or not. Results indicate that reduced stem Ca during water stress is probably not a direct result of decreased root energy needed for active uptake or reduced translocation out of the root. Calcium absorption appeared to be related to the amount of unsuberized root surface available for Ca uptake.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PEG-induced water stress reduced shoot and root growth in peach seedlings.

Treatment
Polyethylene glycol (PEG-4000)-induced water stress (—0.5 to —7.5 bars)e0
Outcome
shoot and root growthe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Polyethylene glycol (PEG-4000)-induced water stress (—0.5 to —7.5 bars) reduced shoot and root growth, water use, and stem 45 Ca in seedlings of peach ( Prunus persica (L.) Batsch)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–189 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PEG-induced water stress reduced water use in peach seedlings.

Treatment
Polyethylene glycol (PEG-4000)-induced water stress (—0.5 to —7.5 bars)e0
Outcome
water usee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Polyethylene glycol (PEG-4000)-induced water stress (—0.5 to —7.5 bars) reduced shoot and root growth, water use, and stem 45 Ca in seedlings of peach ( Prunus persica (L.) Batsch)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–189 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PEG-induced water stress reduced stem 45 Ca in peach seedlings.

Treatment
Polyethylene glycol (PEG-4000)-induced water stress (—0.5 to —7.5 bars)e0
Outcome
stem 45 Cae0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Polyethylene glycol (PEG-4000)-induced water stress (—0.5 to —7.5 bars) reduced shoot and root growth, water use, and stem 45 Ca in seedlings of peach ( Prunus persica (L.) Batsch)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–189 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf sucrose feeding did not affect stem calcium under either osmotic condition.

Treatment
Sucrose feeding through a leafe0
Outcome
stem 45 Cae0
Direction
did not affecte0
Comparator
with or without osmotic stresse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sucrose feeding through a leaf did not affect stem 45 Ca with or without osmotic stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 191–278 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium uptake per water used did not differ across osmotic potentials.

Treatment
different solution osmotic potentialse0
Outcome
45 Calcium uptake per milligram water usede0
Direction
not differente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“45 Calcium uptake per milligram water used was not different at different solution osmotic potentials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 280–381 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium uptake into stems was low when calcium was supplied only to stressed roots, regardless of other-root stress.

Treatment
45 Ca was supplied only to the water-stressed root halfe0
Outcome
45 Ca uptake into stemse0
Direction
lowe0
Comparator
whether the other root half was stressed or note0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“if 45 Ca was supplied only to the water-stressed root half, 45 Ca uptake into stems was low regardless of whether the other root half was stressed or not”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–622 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–72 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced stem calcium during stress is probably not directly due to lower root energy or translocation.

Treatment
water stresse0
Outcome
reduced stem Cae0
Qualifier
probably not a direct result of decreased root energy needed for active uptake or reduced translocation out of the roote0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reduced stem Ca during water stress is probably not a direct result of decreased root energy needed for active uptake or reduced translocation out of the root”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–804 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–72 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium absorption appeared related to available unsuberized root surface.

Organ / stage
unsuberized root surfacee0
Outcome
Calcium absorptione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Calcium absorption appeared to be related to the amount of unsuberized root surface available for Ca uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 806–913 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–72 · show in text ↑

calcium atom · nutrient: content · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 7 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

drought · growth · Prunus persica (peach)Results differ

14 papers: 4 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

drought · physiology: water · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 1 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

drought · nutrient: content · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

infection · nutrient: content · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.