Paper · 2021 · ˜The œjournal of cotton science/Journal of cotton science

Palmer Amaranth Control by Glufosinate Depends on Application Time of Day

J. Drake Copeland; A. Stanley Culpepper; Alan C. York; et al.

5
claims
13
verbatim quotes
0
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Glufosinate is used widely to control glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri S. Wats.) in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Previous research has shown weed control with several herbicides, including glufosinate, can be affected by application time of day. The response sometimes has been attributed to diurnal leaf movement (leaf orientation) in the weeds. The objectives of our research were to determine the influence of time of day of glufosinate application on Palmer amaranth control and to determine if the response was related to diurnal leaf orientation. Field experiments in five states evaluated Palmer amaranth control with glufosinate applied at nine intervals ranging from 1 h before sunrise to 6 h after sunrise and nine intervals ranging from 6 h before sunset to 1 h after sunset. Greatest Palmer amaranth control was achieved with glufosinate applied 2 h after sunrise to 1 h before sunset. Ammonium sulfate, added only to glufosinate 1 h before sunrise or 1 h after sunset treatments, did not improve control. Leaf angles of Palmer amaranth and velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti L.) were determined in a greenhouse at 1 h before light, 2 h after light, mid-day, 2 h before dark, and 1 h after dark. Leaves of velvetleaf oriented downward during the dark periods but time of day had no effect on leaf orientation of Palmer amaranth. These results demonstrate the need for sunlight for optimum glufosinate efficacy on Palmer amaranth.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glufosinate achieved greatest Palmer amaranth control when applied from 2 h after sunrise to 1 h before sunset.

Treatment
glufosinate applied 2 h after sunrise to 1 h before sunsete0
Interactor
Palmer amaranthe0weed
Outcome
Palmer amaranth controle0
Direction
Greateste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Greatest Palmer amaranth control was achieved with glufosinate applied 2 h after sunrise to 1 h before sunset.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 814–924 · show in text ↑
t0

“Palmer Amaranth Control by Glufosinate Depends on Application Time of Day”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–73 · show in text ↑
e2

“in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 105–138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium sulfate did not improve weed control when added to glufosinate near sunrise or after sunset.

Treatment
Ammonium sulfatee0
Outcome
controle0
Direction
did not improvee0
Comparator
glufosinatee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ammonium sulfate, added only to glufosinate 1 h before sunrise or 1 h after sunset treatments, did not improve control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 925–1044 · show in text ↑
t0

“Palmer Amaranth Control by Glufosinate Depends on Application Time of Day”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–73 · show in text ↑
e2

“in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 105–138 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Velvetleaf leaves oriented downward in darkness.

Taxon
velvetleafAbutilon theophrastie0
Outcome
Leaves of velvetleaf oriented downwarde0
Qualifier
dark periodse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abutilon theophrasti
Abutilon theophrasti · TaxonI.Sáček, senior · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaves of velvetleaf oriented downward during the dark periods but time of day had no effect on leaf orientation of Palmer amaranth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1233–1365 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Time of day did not affect Palmer amaranth leaf orientation.

Interactor
Palmer amaranthe0weed
Outcome
leaf orientation of Palmer amaranthe0
Direction
no effecte0
Setting
time of daye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaves of velvetleaf oriented downward during the dark periods but time of day had no effect on leaf orientation of Palmer amaranth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1233–1365 · show in text ↑
t0

“Palmer Amaranth Control by Glufosinate Depends on Application Time of Day”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–73 · show in text ↑
e2

“in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 105–138 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sunlight is needed for optimum glufosinate efficacy against Palmer amaranth.

Interactor
Palmer amaranthe0weed
Outcome
glufosinate efficacy on Palmer amaranthe0
Qualifier
need for sunlighte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These results demonstrate the need for sunlight for optimum glufosinate efficacy on Palmer amaranth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1366–1466 · show in text ↑
t0

“Palmer Amaranth Control by Glufosinate Depends on Application Time of Day”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–73 · show in text ↑
e2

“in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 105–138 · show in text ↑

ammonium sulfate · control · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

glufosinate · control · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 20 positive, 2 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.