Paper · 2022 · 2022 Houston, Texas July 17-20, 2022

Establishment of a CA park to investigate long term conservation agriculture practices to improve soil health for sustainable crop production

Md. Ayub Hossain; Muhammad Arshadul Hoque; MD Jahangir Alam; et al.

1
claims
3
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract. Conservation agriculture is a farming system with good agricultural practice to improve soil organic carbon which is declining due to extensive tillage, intensive cropping practice and high yielding varieties. A conservation agriculture park (CA Park) has been established in Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute (BARI), Gazipur (23059′05.0″N, 90024′50.9″E) during 2020-21 with the cooperation of ASMIH-Bangladesh project to evaluate the long-term effect of CA on soil health and crop yield. The whole park (1.0 ha) has been divided into four sections to conduct different CA experiments through land development and leveling. The first (southern) section is high land which is used for conducting tillage and studying residue effect on crop productivity, soil health and profitability in maize-cover crop-rice cropping pattern. The second section is medium land for testing and validation of different CA machinery. The third section is also medium land and used for legume-rice-cover crop cropping pattern. The fourth section (northern) is low land for unpuddled rice planting in long term rice-rice-rice cropping pattern. The maize and mungbean experiments were conducted with four tillage methods such as strip, zero, bed planting and conventional method. Rice experiment was conducted with manual transplanting in conventional tilled soil, mechanical transplanting in conventional tilled soil, manual transplanting in unpuddled soil and mechanical transplanting in unpuddled soil. The yield of maize, mungbean and rice were not varied with the treatments since advantage of CA could not be achieved in the first year. This CA Park will assist to generate knowledge and disseminate it to farmers, students, researchers and policy makers.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 1

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yields of maize, mungbean and rice did not vary among the tillage and establishment treatments in the first year of a conservation agriculture park.

Taxon
maize, mungbean and riceOryza sativaZea maysVigna radiatae1
Treatment
four tillage methods such as strip, zero, bed planting and conventional methode2
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
not variede1
Qualifier
first yeare1
Setting
Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute (BARI), Gazipure3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The yield of maize, mungbean and rice were not varied with the treatments since advantage of CA could not be achieved in the first year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1502–1637 · show in text ↑
e2

“The maize and mungbean experiments were conducted with four tillage methods such as strip, zero, bed planting and conventional method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1274 · show in text ↑
e3

“Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute (BARI), Gazipur”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 286–344 · show in text ↑

tillage · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

81 papers: 67 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 67 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

77 papers more in this group

See all 81 papers →

tillage · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

729 papers: 587 positive, 142 negative or no effect

141 papers in the same direction as this paper · 587 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

725 papers more in this group

See all 729 papers →

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

286 papers in the same direction as this paper · 812 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.