Paper · 2022 · Journal of Eco-friendly Agriculture

On farm trials on management of pod borer complex in green gram

Keshav Mehra; R.K. Shivran; Naval Kishor; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Pulses productivity in Rajasthan is lesser than the national average due to the poor management of the crop. Green gram, an important pulse crop, is attacked by different pod borer species like gram pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera, spotted pod borer, Maruca testulalis and M. vitrata, spiny pod borer, Etiella zinckenella, etc. Pod borers directly feed on the pods and seeds causing appreciable deterioration in grain quality and quantity. Pod borer complex is a major constraint to increase production of green gram therefore the on farm trial (OFT) were undertaken by the Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Lunkaransar of Bikaner for two consecutive years 2019 and 2020. The results on the management of pod borer complex in green gram indicated that maximum per cent reduction in larval population of pod borers was observed in 79.25 and 82.69 per cent in kharif 2019 and 2020, respectively, in recommended spray (emamectin benzoate 5 SG 0.5 gm per litre water). The maximum benefit cost ratio of 2.77 and 4.00 were obtained in the recommended practices, while it was minimum 1.66 and 2.63 in farmers practice (quinalphos 25 EC @ 1.25 l ha−1) during kharif 2019 and 2020.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Recommended emamectin spray reduced pod borer larvae by 79.25% in kharif 2019.

Treatment
emamectin benzoate 5 SG 0.5 gm per litre watere0
Interactor
pod borerse0pest
Outcome
larval population of pod borerse0
Direction
reductione0
Value
79.25e0
Qualifier
kharif 2019e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum per cent reduction in larval population of pod borers was observed in 79.25 and 82.69 per cent in kharif 2019 and 2020, respectively, in recommended spray (emamectin benzoate 5 SG 0.5 gm per litre water)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 740–951 · show in text ↑
e1

“Green gram, an important pulse crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 109–144 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Recommended emamectin spray reduced pod borer larvae by 82.69% in kharif 2020.

Treatment
emamectin benzoate 5 SG 0.5 gm per litre watere0
Interactor
pod borerse0pest
Outcome
larval population of pod borerse0
Direction
reductione0
Value
82.69 per cente0
Qualifier
2020e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum per cent reduction in larval population of pod borers was observed in 79.25 and 82.69 per cent in kharif 2019 and 2020, respectively, in recommended spray (emamectin benzoate 5 SG 0.5 gm per litre water)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 740–951 · show in text ↑
e1

“Green gram, an important pulse crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 109–144 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Recommended practice had a benefit-cost ratio of 2.77 in 2019 versus 1.66 for farmer practice.

Treatment
recommended practicese0
Outcome
benefit cost ratioe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
2.77e0
Qualifier
kharif 2019e0
Comparator
farmers practicee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum benefit cost ratio of 2.77 and 4.00 were obtained in the recommended practices, while it was minimum 1.66 and 2.63 in farmers practice (quinalphos 25 EC @ 1.25 l ha−1) during kharif 2019 and 2020”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 957–1160 · show in text ↑
e1

“Green gram, an important pulse crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 109–144 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Recommended practice had a benefit-cost ratio of 4.00 in 2020 versus 2.63 for farmer practice.

Treatment
recommended practicese0
Outcome
benefit cost ratioe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
4.00e0
Qualifier
2020e0
Comparator
farmers practicee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum benefit cost ratio of 2.77 and 4.00 were obtained in the recommended practices, while it was minimum 1.66 and 2.63 in farmers practice (quinalphos 25 EC @ 1.25 l ha−1) during kharif 2019 and 2020”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 957–1160 · show in text ↑
e1

“Green gram, an important pulse crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 109–144 · show in text ↑

emamectin benzoate · pest · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

transgenic · pest · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.