Abstract
Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) is considered an important crop, but local producers face difficulties in choosing the appropriate variety due to its diversity and ecological adaptability. In an effort to provide an alternative option of varieties and selection of suitable varieties, this research was conducted to evaluate the comparative performance of sixteen tomato varieties (11 AVRDC lines, five check varieties) at Tangaro, Catarman, Camiguin from January to April 2014 using randomized complete block design with three replications under field conditions. It was found out that plant height, days to 50% flowering, days to first harvest, plant vigor, percent survival, fruit yield, number of fruits, fruit weight, marketable yield, and resistance to tomato yellow leaf curl virus (TYLCV) showed significant differences among the various tomato varieties under trial except for the fruit size. Maximum plant height (65.30 cm) at 60DAT was recorded in T11 (AVTO 1002) followed by T8 (AVTO 1130). Most check varieties produced first flowers earlier compared to AVRDC lines, with T15 (CV4 M) at 20.67 days and consequently mature early by having its first harvest (56DAT) at least two days earlier except for T1 (AVTO 1009), T2 (AVTO 1003) and T3 (AVTO 9803). T12 (CV1 TD) exhibited a vigorous plant stand compared to AVRDC lines T2 (AVTO 1003) and T8 (AVTO 1130), which showed a weak stand at the first harvest. Checked varieties T12 (CV1 TD) has the highest percentage of survival, while T7 (AVTO 0101) and T10 (AVTO 9001) showed a percent plant survival statistically comparable to other check varieties. T14 (CV3 MF1) produced the most number of fruits, while T5 (AVTO 1004) produced the least. The highest computed yield per hectare was observed from T14 (CV3 MF1), while the lowest yield was computed from AVRDC line T9 (AVTO 1008). AVRDC lines T1 (AVTO 1009), T2 (AVTO 1003), and T3 (AVTO 9803) are most susceptible to TYLCV, while checked varieties were more resistant. Considering the overall performance, it was found out that the checked varieties performed well. AVRDC lines T10 (AVTO 9001) and T4 (AVTO 1173) were also promising for their growth and yield performance and resistance to TYLCV. However, the potential of these varieties is needed to be further tested for verification under different growing seasons to elicit substantial conclusions.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 18
Claim · model-written summary
Varieties differed significantly in height, flowering and first harvest timing.
- Taxon
- Tomato
Solanum lycopersicume1 - Material
- tomato varietiese0
- Outcome
- plant height, days to 50% flowering, days to first harveste0
- Direction
- differencese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“plant height, days to 50% flowering, days to first harvest, plant vigor, percent survival, fruit yield, number of fruits, fruit weight, marketable yield, and resistance to tomato yellow leaf curl virus (TYLCV) showed significant differences among the various tomato varieties under trial except for the fruit size.”
e1“Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)”
Claim · model-written summary
Varieties differed significantly in vigor, survival and fruit number.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicume1
- Outcome
- plant vigor, percent survival, fruit yielde0
- Direction
- differencese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“plant height, days to 50% flowering, days to first harvest, plant vigor, percent survival, fruit yield, number of fruits, fruit weight, marketable yield, and resistance to tomato yellow leaf curl virus (TYLCV) showed significant differences among the various tomato varieties under trial except for the fruit size.”
e1“Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)”
Claim · model-written summary
Varieties differed significantly in fruit weight, marketable yield and TYLCV resistance.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicume1
- Outcome
- fruit weight, marketable yield, and resistance to tomato yellow leaf curl virus (TYLCV)e0
- Direction
- differencese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“fruit weight, marketable yield, and resistance to tomato yellow leaf curl virus (TYLCV) showed significant differences among the various tomato varieties under trial except for the fruit size.”
e1“Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)”
Claim · model-written summary
Fruit size did not differ significantly among varieties.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicume2
- Outcome
- fruit sizee0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“except for the fruit size.”
e1“showed significant differences among the various tomato varieties under trial except for the fruit size.”
e2“Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)”
Claim · model-written summary
T11 had the maximum plant height of 65.30 cm at 60DAT.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicume1
- Material
- T11 (AVTO 1002)e0
- Outcome
- plant heighte0
- Direction
- Maximume0
- Value
- 65.30 cme0
- Qualifier
- 60DATe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Maximum plant height (65.30 cm) at 60DAT was recorded in T11 (AVTO 1002) followed by T8 (AVTO 1130).”
e1“Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)”
Claim · model-written summary
T15 first flowered at 20.67 days, earlier than most AVRDC lines.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicume1
- Material
- T15 (CV4 M)e0
- Outcome
- first flowerse0
- Direction
- earliere0
- Value
- 20.67 dayse0
- Comparator
- AVRDC linese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Most check varieties produced first flowers earlier compared to AVRDC lines, with T15 (CV4 M) at 20.67 days”
e1“Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)”
Claim · model-written summary
T15 had its first harvest at 56DAT, at least two days earlier, with three named exceptions.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicume2
- Material
- T15 (CV4 M)e1
- Outcome
- first harveste0
- Direction
- earliere0
- Value
- 56DATe0
- Qualifier
- at least two days earlier except for T1 (AVTO 1009), T2 (AVTO 1003) and T3 (AVTO 9803)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“its first harvest (56DAT) at least two days earlier except for T1 (AVTO 1009), T2 (AVTO 1003) and T3 (AVTO 9803).”
e1“T15 (CV4 M)”
e2“Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)”
Claim · model-written summary
T12 had a vigorous stand relative to weak stands of T2 and T8 at first harvest.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicume1
- Material
- T12 (CV1 TD)e0
- Outcome
- vigorous plant stande0
- Qualifier
- at the first harveste0
- Comparator
- AVRDC lines T2 (AVTO 1003) and T8 (AVTO 1130)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“T12 (CV1 TD) exhibited a vigorous plant stand compared to AVRDC lines T2 (AVTO 1003) and T8 (AVTO 1130), which showed a weak stand at the first harvest.”
e1“Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)”
Claim · model-written summary
T12 had the highest survival percentage.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicume1
- Material
- T12 (CV1 TD)e0
- Outcome
- percentage of survivale0
- Direction
- higheste0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Checked varieties T12 (CV1 TD) has the highest percentage of survival”
e1“Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)”
Claim · model-written summary
T7 and T10 survival was statistically comparable to other check varieties.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicume1
- Outcome
- percent plant survivale0
- Direction
- statistically comparablee0
- Comparator
- other check varietiese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“T7 (AVTO 0101) and T10 (AVTO 9001) showed a percent plant survival statistically comparable to other check varieties.”
e1“Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)”
Claim · model-written summary
T14 produced the most fruits.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicume1
- Material
- T14 (CV3 MF1)e0
- Outcome
- number of fruitse0
- Direction
- moste0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“T14 (CV3 MF1) produced the most number of fruits”
e1“Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)”
Claim · model-written summary
T5 produced the fewest fruits.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicume2
- Material
- T5 (AVTO 1004)e0
- Outcome
- number of fruitse1
- Direction
- leaste0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“T5 (AVTO 1004) produced the least.”
e1“T14 (CV3 MF1) produced the most number of fruits, while T5 (AVTO 1004) produced the least.”
e2“Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)”
Claim · model-written summary
T14 had the highest computed yield per hectare.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicume1
- Material
- T14 (CV3 MF1)e0
- Outcome
- computed yield per hectaree0
- Direction
- higheste0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The highest computed yield per hectare was observed from T14 (CV3 MF1)”
e1“Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)”
Claim · model-written summary
T9 had the lowest computed yield.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicume1
- Material
- T9 (AVTO 1008)e0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- loweste0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the lowest yield was computed from AVRDC line T9 (AVTO 1008).”
e1“Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)”
Claim · model-written summary
T1, T2 and T3 were most susceptible to TYLCV.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicume1
- Outcome
- susceptible to TYLCVe0
- Direction
- moste0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“AVRDC lines T1 (AVTO 1009), T2 (AVTO 1003), and T3 (AVTO 9803) are most susceptible to TYLCV”
e1“Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)”
Claim · model-written summary
Check varieties were more resistant to TYLCV.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicume2
- Material
- checked varietiese0
- Outcome
- resistance to tomato yellow leaf curl virus (TYLCV)e1
- Direction
- more resistante0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“checked varieties were more resistant.”
e1“resistance to tomato yellow leaf curl virus (TYLCV)”
e2“Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)”
Claim · model-written summary
T10 and T4 were considered promising for growth, yield and TYLCV resistance.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicume1
- Outcome
- growth and yield performance and resistance to TYLCVe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“AVRDC lines T10 (AVTO 9001) and T4 (AVTO 1173) were also promising for their growth and yield performance and resistance to TYLCV.”
e1“Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)”
Claim · model-written summary
Further testing across growing seasons was recommended for the promising varieties.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicume1
- Outcome
- further tested for verification under different growing seasonse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the potential of these varieties is needed to be further tested for verification under different growing seasons”
e1“Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)”