Paper · 2022 · SVU-International Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Effectiveness of nanoparticles of some plant extracts against root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita on tomato plants.

Deiaa El-Habashy

9
claims
15
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

The present study was carried out in order to investigate the efficiency of various formulations of silver-botanical nanoparticles, i.e. cloves, lantana camara and conyza dioscoridis as nematicide substitutes against the tomato root- knot nematode (M. incognita), in both laboratory and under greenhouse conditions. Results clarified that the tested normal and NE-extracts, significantly and drastically, increased (J2) mortality % and reduced egg-hatching and the effect increased with increasing compound concentration and exposure time. However, nanoparticles forms of all tested compounds consistently showed higher effect than normal extracts forms. Meanwhile, NP-L. camara showed the highest J2 mortality % and egg-hatching inhibition at all exposure times. The nanoparticles, dramatically reduced root galls, egg masses, eggs and final population of M. incognita infecting tomato plants at the application rate of 100 μg/ml. Meanwhile, the NP-L. camara treatment was the most efficient in reducing root galls, egg masses, eggs and population of J2 in soil, followed by NP-Cloves and NP-C. dioscoridis. Moreover, the different extracts treatments improved and increased the mean values of tomato growth parameters in the inoculated treated plants. NP-L. camara showed the highest growth parameters. However, most mean values of growth parameters for NP-Cloves treatment not significantly different from the NP-L. camara. Consequently, these nanoparticles extracts could be effective potentially and environmentally safe to control tomato knot-root nematode.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Normal and nanoparticle extracts increased J2 mortality and reduced egg hatching, with stronger effects at higher concentration and longer exposure.

Treatment
normal and NE-extractse0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pathogen
Outcome
(J2) mortality % and reduced egg-hatchinge0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
increasing compound concentration and exposure timee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the tested normal and NE-extracts, significantly and drastically, increased (J2) mortality % and reduced egg-hatching and the effect increased with increasing compound concentration and exposure time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 339–538 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effectiveness of nanoparticles of some plant extracts against root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita on tomato plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nanoparticle forms had greater nematicidal effects than normal extract forms.

Treatment
nanoparticles formse0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pathogen
Outcome
effecte0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
normal extracts formse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nanoparticles forms of all tested compounds consistently showed higher effect than normal extracts forms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 549–653 · show in text ↑
t0

“Meloidogyne incognita on tomato plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NP-L. camara gave the highest J2 mortality and egg-hatching inhibition at all exposure times.

Treatment
NP-L. camarae0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pathogen
Outcome
J2 mortality % and egg-hatching inhibitione0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NP-L. camara showed the highest J2 mortality % and egg-hatching inhibition at all exposure times”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–762 · show in text ↑
t0

“Meloidogyne incognita on tomato plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nanoparticles reduced root galls, egg masses, eggs, and final M. incognita population on tomato at 100 μg/ml.

Treatment
nanoparticlese0
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
Outcome
root galls, egg masses, eggs and final populatione0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
100 μg/mle0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The nanoparticles, dramatically reduced root galls, egg masses, eggs and final population of M. incognita infecting tomato plants at the application rate of 100 μg/ml”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–930 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NP-L. camara most efficiently reduced root galls, egg masses, eggs, and J2 soil populations, followed by NP-Cloves and NP-C. dioscoridis.

Treatment
NP-L. camarae0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pathogen
Outcome
root galls, egg masses, eggs and population of J2 in soile0
Direction
reducinge0
Comparator
NP-Cloves and NP-C. dioscoridise0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the NP-L. camara treatment was the most efficient in reducing root galls, egg masses, eggs and population of J2 in soil, followed by NP-Cloves and NP-C. dioscoridis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 943–1107 · show in text ↑
t0

“Meloidogyne incognita on tomato plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Different extract treatments increased tomato growth parameters in inoculated plants.

Treatment
different extracts treatmentse0
Outcome
tomato growth parameterse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the different extracts treatments improved and increased the mean values of tomato growth parameters in the inoculated treated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1119–1252 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NP-L. camara gave the highest tomato growth parameters.

Treatment
NP-L. camarae0
Outcome
growth parameterse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NP-L. camara showed the highest growth parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1254–1303 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Most growth parameter means under NP-Cloves did not differ significantly from NP-L. camara.

Treatment
NP-Cloves treatmente0
Outcome
growth parameterse0
Direction
not significantly differente0
Comparator
NP-L. camarae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“most mean values of growth parameters for NP-Cloves treatment not significantly different from the NP-L. camara”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1314–1425 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–121 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors consider nanoparticle extracts potentially effective and environmentally safe for tomato root-knot nematode control.

Treatment
nanoparticles extractse0
Outcome
control tomato knot-root nematodee0
Qualifier
potentially and environmentally safee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“these nanoparticles extracts could be effective potentially and environmentally safe to control tomato knot-root nematode”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1441–1562 · show in text ↑

nanoparticle · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

100 papers: 94 positive, 6 negative or no effect

93 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

96 papers more in this group

See all 100 papers →

botanical · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

291 papers: 203 positive, 88 negative or no effect

202 papers in the same direction as this paper · 87 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

287 papers more in this group

See all 291 papers →

nanoparticle · Meloidogyne incognita · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

17 papers: 17 positive, 0 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.