Paper · 2022 · VEGETABLE CROPS OF RUSSIA

Increasing the yield of melon in a greenhouse at vegetative grafting on vegetable marrow rootstocks

R. F. Mavlyanova; E. E. Lyan

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

In Uzbekistan, there is a demand of the population for fresh melon fruits during the off-season. In the Research Institute of Vegetable, Melon Crops and Potato for the first time studies were carried out, when grown in a greenhouse, on the vegetative grafting of melon’s Zarkhal variety on the vegetable marrow varieties used as rootstocks. The aim of the research was to study the effect of vegetable marrow rootstocks on the variability of economically valuable traits of the Zarkhal melon variety and to identify promising combinations of vegetable marrow rootstocks that increase the yield and quality of melon fruits. Methods . The studies were carried out in accordance with the guidelines of the World Vegetable Center. As a control, ungrafted plants of the Zarkhal melon variety were used. For comparison with the control, plants of this variety were grafted onto their own plants. Also, plants of the melon variety Zarkhal (scion) were grafted in combinations on 10 varieties of vegetable marrow, which served as rootstocks. Vegetative grafting of melon on vegetable marrow rootstocks was carried out “in a split” in the phase of the first true leaf when the stem diameter reached 4.1–4.3 mm and plant height 4.4–5.9 cm. Results . In comparison with the control, in combinations of grafting the Zarkhal melon variety onto the Grecheskiye 110, Unumdor, Delicates and Skvorushka varieties of vegetable marrow, the flowering of paternal and female flowers, the onset of fruit formation was observed 2 days earlier. In the same combinations, fruit ripening was observed on 81-82 days, which is 4-5 days earlier than the control (86 days). They also had the tallest plants (203-205 cm), the plants formed 2-4 leaves more than the others. Marketable yields between combinations ranged from 7.89 to 9.75 kg/m2 . The melon variety Zarkhal, grafted onto its own plants, lagged behind the control in all phases of development and yield. The early yield in combinations was from 3.95 to 5.75 kg/m2 and amounted to 53-59% of the yield. The average fruit weight varied from 785 to 810 g.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting Zarkhal melon onto Grecheskiye 110 advanced flowering and fruit formation by two days relative to ungrafted plants.

Taxon
melonCucumis meloe0
Material
Zarkhale0
Treatment
grafting the Zarkhal melon variety onto the Grecheskiye 110e0
Outcome
flowering of paternal and female flowers, the onset of fruit formatione0
Direction
earliere0
Value
2 dayse0
Comparator
ungrafted plantse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in combinations of grafting the Zarkhal melon variety onto the Grecheskiye 110, Unumdor, Delicates and Skvorushka varieties of vegetable marrow, the flowering of paternal and female flowers, the onset of fruit formation was observed 2 days earlier.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1272–1520 · show in text ↑
e1

“As a control, ungrafted plants of the Zarkhal melon variety were used.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–797 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same named rootstock combinations ripened fruit on days 81–82, four to five days earlier than controls.

Taxon
melonCucumis meloe1
Treatment
grafting the Zarkhal melon variety onto the Grecheskiye 110, Unumdor, Delicates and Skvorushka varieties of vegetable marrowe1
Outcome
fruit ripeninge0
Direction
earliere0
Value
4-5 dayse0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the same combinations, fruit ripening was observed on 81-82 days, which is 4-5 days earlier than the control (86 days).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1521–1643 · show in text ↑
e1

“grafting the Zarkhal melon variety onto the Grecheskiye 110, Unumdor, Delicates and Skvorushka varieties of vegetable marrow”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1291–1415 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The named graft combinations produced the tallest plants, at 203–205 cm.

Taxon
melonCucumis meloe1
Treatment
grafting the Zarkhal melon variety onto the Grecheskiye 110, Unumdor, Delicates and Skvorushka varieties of vegetable marrowe1
Outcome
tallest plantse0
Direction
talleste0
Value
203-205 cme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“They also had the tallest plants (203-205 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1644–1689 · show in text ↑
e1

“grafting the Zarkhal melon variety onto the Grecheskiye 110, Unumdor, Delicates and Skvorushka varieties of vegetable marrow”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1291–1415 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The named graft combinations formed two to four more leaves than other plants.

Taxon
melonCucumis meloe1
Treatment
grafting the Zarkhal melon variety onto the Grecheskiye 110, Unumdor, Delicates and Skvorushka varieties of vegetable marrowe1
Outcome
leavese0
Direction
moree0
Value
2-4 leavese0
Comparator
the otherse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the plants formed 2-4 leaves more than the others”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1691–1740 · show in text ↑
e1

“grafting the Zarkhal melon variety onto the Grecheskiye 110, Unumdor, Delicates and Skvorushka varieties of vegetable marrow”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1291–1415 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Marketable yield across graft combinations ranged from 7.89 to 9.75 kg/m2.

Taxon
melonCucumis melot0
Outcome
Marketable yieldse0
Value
7.89 to 9.75 kg/m2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Marketable yields between combinations ranged from 7.89 to 9.75 kg/m2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1742–1811 · show in text ↑
t0

“melon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Self-grafted Zarkhal melon lagged behind ungrafted controls in every developmental phase and yield.

Taxon
melonCucumis meloe0
Material
Zarkhale0
Treatment
grafted onto its own plantse0
Outcome
all phases of development and yielde0
Direction
lagged behinde0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The melon variety Zarkhal, grafted onto its own plants, lagged behind the control in all phases of development and yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1814–1935 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early yield across combinations ranged from 3.95 to 5.75 kg/m2.

Taxon
melonCucumis melot0
Outcome
early yielde0
Value
3.95 to 5.75 kg/m2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The early yield in combinations was from 3.95 to 5.75 kg/m2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1936–1995 · show in text ↑
t0

“melon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–29 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early yield comprised 53–59% of total yield.

Taxon
melonCucumis melot0
Outcome
early yielde1
Value
53-59%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“amounted to 53-59% of the yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2000–2031 · show in text ↑
e1

“The early yield in combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1936–1967 · show in text ↑
t0

“melon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–29 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average fruit weight ranged from 785 to 810 g.

Taxon
melonCucumis melot0
Outcome
average fruit weighte0
Value
785 to 810 ge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The average fruit weight varied from 785 to 810 g.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2033–2083 · show in text ↑
t0

“melon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–29 · show in text ↑

grafting · yield · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Results differ

34 papers: 30 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

grafting · quality: postharvest · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

grafting · growth · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 34 positive, 5 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.