Paper · 2022 · African Journal of Agricultural Research

Spatial and temporal variability of soil micronutrients and their relationships with wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) yield and some major soil variables

Menna Assefa

8
claims
9
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Studying the spatial and temporal variability of soil micronutrients and their effects on plant growth is important for implementing precision-farming and/or economizing fertilizer management. The present investigation was done through soil sampling (0–20 cm depth) from three locations in central Ethiopia. The tools employed include, descriptive and/or classical statistics. The concentrations of available copper ranged from 1.38–3.20 mg/kg with narrower range in season-I, than season-II. Manganese ranged from 5.00 – 65.00 mg/kg, indicating its significant uneven distribution over the years and locations. The concentrations of iron ranged from 1.80 – 8.20 mg/kg. Narrower ranges were observed for zinc, boron and molybdenum. From the influencing factors analysis, soil pH was the major factor negatively influenced the availability of the evaluated micronutrients, except molybdenum. Organic carbon was the major positive contributor to sulfur, nitrogen, manganese, zinc, and boron availability. Considering the widely varied wheat yields due to the variations in soil nutrients, more positive relationship was established for the grain than total biomass yield indicating more partitioning of plant nutrients into grains. Overall, the dynamics of soil nutrients, particularly the micronutrients and their influences on wheat yield were described and the results could provide practical bases for sustaining crop production in precision-agriculture. Key words: Soil micronutrients, spatial and temporal variability, geostatistics, regression, correlation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Available copper ranged from 1.38-3.20 mg/kg, with a narrower range in season-I than season-II.

Outcome
concentrations of available coppere0
Value
1.38–3.20 mg/kge0
Qualifier
narrower range in season-I, than season-IIe0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The concentrations of available copper ranged from 1.38–3.20 mg/kg with narrower range in season-I, than season-II”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 377–491 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manganese ranged from 5.00 to 65.00 mg/kg, with significant uneven distribution over years and locations.

Outcome
Manganesee0
Value
5.00 – 65.00 mg/kge0
Qualifier
significant uneven distribution over the years and locationse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Manganese ranged from 5.00 – 65.00 mg/kg, indicating its significant uneven distribution over the years and locations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–610 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Iron concentrations ranged from 1.80 to 8.20 mg/kg.

Outcome
concentrations of irone0
Value
1.80 – 8.20 mg/kge0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The concentrations of iron ranged from 1.80 – 8.20 mg/kg”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 612–668 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc, boron and molybdenum showed narrower ranges.

Outcome
Narrower ranges were observed for zinc, boron and molybdenume0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Narrower ranges were observed for zinc, boron and molybdenum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 670–730 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil pH was the major factor negatively influencing availability of the evaluated micronutrients, except molybdenum.

Treatment
soil pHe0
Outcome
availability of the evaluated micronutrientse0
Direction
negativelye0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“soil pH was the major factor negatively influenced the availability of the evaluated micronutrients, except molybdenum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 771–889 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic carbon was the major positive contributor to sulfur, nitrogen, manganese, zinc and boron availability.

Compound
Organic carbone0
Outcome
sulfur, nitrogen, manganese, zinc, and boron availabilitye0
Direction
positivee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Organic carbon was the major positive contributor to sulfur, nitrogen, manganese, zinc, and boron availability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–1001 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A more positive relationship was established between soil nutrients and wheat grain yield than total biomass yield.

Compound
soil nutrientse0
Outcome
graine0
Direction
more positivee0
Comparator
total biomass yielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Considering the widely varied wheat yields due to the variations in soil nutrients, more positive relationship was established for the grain than total biomass yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1168 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors interpret the stronger grain relationship as more partitioning of plant nutrients into grains.

Compound
plant nutrientse0
Outcome
partitioning of plant nutrients into grainse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“indicating more partitioning of plant nutrients into grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1169–1228 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–113 · show in text ↑