Paper · 2021 · the future of agriculture

EFFECT OF SPRAYING SOME ORGANIC ACIDS ON CERCOSPORALEAF SPOT DISEASE, YIELD AND QUALITY OF SUGAR BEET

I Elgamal; Nasr Ghazy; Amira El-Sherief; et al.

15
claims
31
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Sugar beet (Beta vulgaris var. saccharifera, L.) is one of the main economical sugar crops in Egypt. It is infected with Cercospora leaf spot disease, which is caused by Cercospora baticola Sacc. Fungs, which negatively affect the vegetative growth, yield and quality of sugar beet. The results obtained indicated that Cercospora leaf spot disease severity% and relative efficacy% were significantly reduced by spraying beets with 20 g/ L humic acid followed by 2 g/ L boric acid and 50 Mm/ L citric acid compared with the other treatments, in both seasons. Spraying of 1.5 g/ L boric acid treatment led to significant increase in most of traits where, it achieved thickest and heaviest tops and roots/plant and higher values of (chlorophyll a, b and carotenoids), sucrose, purity percentages, root and sugar yields/fed in both seasons, as compared to other humic acid levels. Application of 15 g humic/ L significantly affected endogenous phytohormones (gibberellins, auxins, cytokinin and abscisic) and gave the highest values of root diameter, fresh and foliage weights/plant, sucrose and purity percentages as well, sodium and potassium contents, root and sugar yields/fed in both seasons, photosynthetic pigments in leaves in 1st season only compared to the rest of the used levels of humic acid. Foliar application of 50 citric acid/fed increased root diameter, (foliage and fresh weights/plant), sucrose and purity percentages as well, root and sugar yields/fed in both seasons in comparison to that those plants sprayed with (30 and 40 mM/L) and the check treatment. Based on, the previously mentioned combination can be recommended to increase root yield and quality of sugar beet as well as to reduce Cercospora leaf spot disease severity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying sugar beet with 20 g/L humic acid followed by 2 g/L boric acid and 50 mM/L citric acid reduced Cercospora leaf spot severity and relative efficacy compared with the other treatments.

Treatment
spraying beets with 20 g/ L humic acid followed by 2 g/ L boric acid and 50 Mm/ L citric acide2
Interactor
Cercospora baticolae1pathogen
Outcome
Cercospora leaf spot disease severity% and relative efficacy%e2
Direction
reducede2
Comparator
the other treatmentse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sugar beet (Beta vulgaris var. saccharifera, L.) is one of the main economical sugar crops in Egypt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–99 · show in text ↑
e1

“which is caused by Cercospora baticola Sacc”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 151–194 · show in text ↑
e2

“Cercospora leaf spot disease severity% and relative efficacy% were significantly reduced by spraying beets with 20 g/ L humic acid followed by 2 g/ L boric acid and 50 Mm/ L citric acid compared with the other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 319–539 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying 1.5 g/L boric acid increased the thickness and weight of sugar beet tops and roots.

Treatment
Spraying of 1.5 g/ L boric acid treatmente3
Outcome
thickest and heaviest tops and roots/plante3
Direction
increasee3
Comparator
other humic acid levelse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sugar beet (Beta vulgaris var. saccharifera, L.) is one of the main economical sugar crops in Egypt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–99 · show in text ↑
e3

“Spraying of 1.5 g/ L boric acid treatment led to significant increase in most of traits where, it achieved thickest and heaviest tops and roots/plant and higher values of (chlorophyll a, b and carotenoids), sucrose, purity percentages, root and sugar yields/fed in both seasons, as compared to other humic acid levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 558–875 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying 1.5 g/L boric acid gave higher chlorophyll a, b and carotenoid values in sugar beet.

Treatment
Spraying of 1.5 g/ L boric acid treatmente3
Outcome
chlorophyll a, b and carotenoidse3
Direction
highere3
Comparator
other humic acid levelse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sugar beet (Beta vulgaris var. saccharifera, L.) is one of the main economical sugar crops in Egypt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–99 · show in text ↑
e3

“Spraying of 1.5 g/ L boric acid treatment led to significant increase in most of traits where, it achieved thickest and heaviest tops and roots/plant and higher values of (chlorophyll a, b and carotenoids), sucrose, purity percentages, root and sugar yields/fed in both seasons, as compared to other humic acid levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 558–875 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying 1.5 g/L boric acid gave higher sucrose and purity percentages in sugar beet.

Treatment
Spraying of 1.5 g/ L boric acid treatmente3
Outcome
sucrose, purity percentagese3
Direction
highere3
Comparator
other humic acid levelse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sugar beet (Beta vulgaris var. saccharifera, L.) is one of the main economical sugar crops in Egypt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–99 · show in text ↑
e3

“Spraying of 1.5 g/ L boric acid treatment led to significant increase in most of traits where, it achieved thickest and heaviest tops and roots/plant and higher values of (chlorophyll a, b and carotenoids), sucrose, purity percentages, root and sugar yields/fed in both seasons, as compared to other humic acid levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 558–875 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying 1.5 g/L boric acid gave higher root and sugar yields in sugar beet.

Treatment
Spraying of 1.5 g/ L boric acid treatmente3
Outcome
root and sugar yieldse3
Direction
highere3
Comparator
other humic acid levelse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sugar beet (Beta vulgaris var. saccharifera, L.) is one of the main economical sugar crops in Egypt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–99 · show in text ↑
e3

“Spraying of 1.5 g/ L boric acid treatment led to significant increase in most of traits where, it achieved thickest and heaviest tops and roots/plant and higher values of (chlorophyll a, b and carotenoids), sucrose, purity percentages, root and sugar yields/fed in both seasons, as compared to other humic acid levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 558–875 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying 15 g/L humic acid significantly affected endogenous phytohormones in sugar beet compared with the other humic acid levels.

Treatment
Application of 15 g humic/ Le4
Outcome
endogenous phytohormones (gibberellins, auxins, cytokinin and abscisic)e4
Comparator
the rest of the used levels of humic acide4

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sugar beet (Beta vulgaris var. saccharifera, L.) is one of the main economical sugar crops in Egypt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–99 · show in text ↑
e4

“Application of 15 g humic/ L significantly affected endogenous phytohormones (gibberellins, auxins, cytokinin and abscisic) and gave the highest values of root diameter, fresh and foliage weights/plant, sucrose and purity percentages as well, sodium and potassium contents, root and sugar yields/fed in both seasons, photosynthetic pigments in leaves in 1st season only compared to the rest of the used levels of humic acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–1300 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying 15 g/L humic acid gave the highest root diameter, fresh and foliage weights per sugar beet plant.

Treatment
Application of 15 g humic/ Le4
Outcome
root diameter, fresh and foliage weights/plante4
Direction
higheste4
Comparator
the rest of the used levels of humic acide4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sugar beet (Beta vulgaris var. saccharifera, L.) is one of the main economical sugar crops in Egypt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–99 · show in text ↑
e4

“Application of 15 g humic/ L significantly affected endogenous phytohormones (gibberellins, auxins, cytokinin and abscisic) and gave the highest values of root diameter, fresh and foliage weights/plant, sucrose and purity percentages as well, sodium and potassium contents, root and sugar yields/fed in both seasons, photosynthetic pigments in leaves in 1st season only compared to the rest of the used levels of humic acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–1300 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying 15 g/L humic acid gave the highest sucrose and purity percentages in sugar beet.

Treatment
Application of 15 g humic/ Le4
Outcome
sucrose and purity percentagese4
Direction
higheste4
Comparator
the rest of the used levels of humic acide4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sugar beet (Beta vulgaris var. saccharifera, L.) is one of the main economical sugar crops in Egypt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–99 · show in text ↑
e4

“Application of 15 g humic/ L significantly affected endogenous phytohormones (gibberellins, auxins, cytokinin and abscisic) and gave the highest values of root diameter, fresh and foliage weights/plant, sucrose and purity percentages as well, sodium and potassium contents, root and sugar yields/fed in both seasons, photosynthetic pigments in leaves in 1st season only compared to the rest of the used levels of humic acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–1300 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying 15 g/L humic acid gave the highest sodium and potassium contents in sugar beet.

Treatment
Application of 15 g humic/ Le4
Outcome
sodium and potassium contentse4
Direction
higheste4
Comparator
the rest of the used levels of humic acide4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sugar beet (Beta vulgaris var. saccharifera, L.) is one of the main economical sugar crops in Egypt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–99 · show in text ↑
e4

“Application of 15 g humic/ L significantly affected endogenous phytohormones (gibberellins, auxins, cytokinin and abscisic) and gave the highest values of root diameter, fresh and foliage weights/plant, sucrose and purity percentages as well, sodium and potassium contents, root and sugar yields/fed in both seasons, photosynthetic pigments in leaves in 1st season only compared to the rest of the used levels of humic acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–1300 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying 15 g/L humic acid gave the highest root and sugar yields in sugar beet.

Treatment
Application of 15 g humic/ Le4
Outcome
root and sugar yieldse4
Direction
higheste4
Comparator
the rest of the used levels of humic acide4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sugar beet (Beta vulgaris var. saccharifera, L.) is one of the main economical sugar crops in Egypt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–99 · show in text ↑
e4

“Application of 15 g humic/ L significantly affected endogenous phytohormones (gibberellins, auxins, cytokinin and abscisic) and gave the highest values of root diameter, fresh and foliage weights/plant, sucrose and purity percentages as well, sodium and potassium contents, root and sugar yields/fed in both seasons, photosynthetic pigments in leaves in 1st season only compared to the rest of the used levels of humic acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–1300 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying 15 g/L humic acid gave the highest photosynthetic pigments in leaves in the first season only.

Treatment
Application of 15 g humic/ Le4
Outcome
photosynthetic pigments in leavese4
Direction
higheste4
Qualifier
in 1st season onlye4
Comparator
the rest of the used levels of humic acide4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sugar beet (Beta vulgaris var. saccharifera, L.) is one of the main economical sugar crops in Egypt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–99 · show in text ↑
e4

“Application of 15 g humic/ L significantly affected endogenous phytohormones (gibberellins, auxins, cytokinin and abscisic) and gave the highest values of root diameter, fresh and foliage weights/plant, sucrose and purity percentages as well, sodium and potassium contents, root and sugar yields/fed in both seasons, photosynthetic pigments in leaves in 1st season only compared to the rest of the used levels of humic acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–1300 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar 50 citric acid/fed increased root diameter and foliage and fresh weights per sugar beet plant compared with the check treatment.

Treatment
Foliar application of 50 citric acid/fede6
Outcome
root diameter, (foliage and fresh weights/plant)e6
Direction
increasede6
Comparator
the check treatmente6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sugar beet (Beta vulgaris var. saccharifera, L.) is one of the main economical sugar crops in Egypt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–99 · show in text ↑
e6

“Foliar application of 50 citric acid/fed increased root diameter, (foliage and fresh weights/plant), sucrose and purity percentages as well, root and sugar yields/fed in both seasons in comparison to that those plants sprayed with (30 and 40 mM/L) and the check treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1302–1573 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar 50 citric acid/fed increased sucrose and purity percentages in sugar beet compared with the check treatment.

Treatment
Foliar application of 50 citric acid/fede6
Outcome
sucrose and purity percentagese6
Direction
increasede6
Comparator
the check treatmente6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sugar beet (Beta vulgaris var. saccharifera, L.) is one of the main economical sugar crops in Egypt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–99 · show in text ↑
e6

“Foliar application of 50 citric acid/fed increased root diameter, (foliage and fresh weights/plant), sucrose and purity percentages as well, root and sugar yields/fed in both seasons in comparison to that those plants sprayed with (30 and 40 mM/L) and the check treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1302–1573 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar 50 citric acid/fed increased root and sugar yields in sugar beet compared with the check treatment.

Treatment
Foliar application of 50 citric acid/fede6
Outcome
root and sugar yieldse6
Direction
increasede6
Comparator
the check treatmente6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sugar beet (Beta vulgaris var. saccharifera, L.) is one of the main economical sugar crops in Egypt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–99 · show in text ↑
e6

“Foliar application of 50 citric acid/fed increased root diameter, (foliage and fresh weights/plant), sucrose and purity percentages as well, root and sugar yields/fed in both seasons in comparison to that those plants sprayed with (30 and 40 mM/L) and the check treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1302–1573 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The combination of humic, boric and citric acid sprays can be recommended to increase sugar beet root yield and quality and reduce Cercospora leaf spot severity.

Treatment
the previously mentioned combinatione7
Outcome
root yield and quality of sugar beete7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sugar beet (Beta vulgaris var. saccharifera, L.) is one of the main economical sugar crops in Egypt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–99 · show in text ↑
e7

“Based on, the previously mentioned combination can be recommended to increase root yield and quality of sugar beet as well as to reduce Cercospora leaf spot disease severity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1575–1748 · show in text ↑

citric acid · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

citric acid · disease · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

boric acid · physiology: pigments · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

boric acid · disease · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

boric acid · molecular: metabolites · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

boric acid · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

other · molecular: metabolites · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

application · disease · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 16 positive, 2 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

8 of 15 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.