Paper · 2021 · JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL SCIENCES

Effects of Ridge Tillage and Organic Manure Treatment on Growth, Leaf Nutrient Concentration and Pearl Millet (Pennisetum glaucum) Stover Yield in Semi-arid Northeast Nigeria

A. M Chiroma; A. B Alhassan; K Usman; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

In the drier areas where crop production is often constrained by low and variable rainfall, the search continues for innovative practices in soil and crop management to make maximum use of the water available for crop growth. Field experiments were therefore conducted in the rainy season of the year 2020 at two locations with contrasting soil types (Sandy Loam), at Teaching and Research Farm of Faculty of Agriculture, University of Maiduguri (Unimaid) and Sandy Clay Loam texture at Alakaramti village both located within Maiduguri and its environs, in northeast Nigeria to evaluate the efficacy of ridging and manure amendment on improving the productivity of the millet crop. In each site, six (6) land preparation and manure treatments consisting of: flatbed (FB), open-ridge (OR), tied-ridge (TR), flat bed + manure (FBM), open-ridge + manure (ORM), and tied-ridge + manure (TRM) were laid out in randomized complete block design with four replicates. The results indicated that soil treated with organic manure irrespective of land preparation type or location had greater nutrient levels compared to the un-amended soil. Millet plants grown in FBM, ORM and TRM plots had increased plant height, number of tillers per plant and stem diameter irrespective of differences in soil type or time of measurement. Millet leaf N, P and K contents were all higher in the manure amended treatments than in the un-amended treatments irrespective of land preparation method or location. The spectacular growth performance exhibited by millet plants grown under manure amended treatments also translated in higher stover yields. Mean increases in straw yield relative to the FB treatment were 36.8% for FBM, 41.8% for ORM and 47.4% for TRM on the sandy loam soil. The corresponding increases in straw yield due to these treatments on the sandy clay loam soil were 116.7% for FBM, 81.1% for ORM and 146.7% for TRM. These results reinforce earlier findings that combining the land preparation practice of ridge tillage (RT) with application of animal manure such as cow dung has the potential of improving the productivity of the millet crop grown under the prevailing edapho-climatic conditions of Maiduguri in northeast Nigeria.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic manure increased soil nutrient levels across land preparation types and locations.

Taxon
Pearl MilletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
organic manuree0
Outcome
nutrient levelse0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
un-amended soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results indicated that soil treated with organic manure irrespective of land preparation type or location had greater nutrient levels compared to the un-amended soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1130 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pearl Millet (Pennisetum glaucum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure-amended millet plots increased plant height.

Taxon
Millete0
Treatment
FBM, ORM and TRMe0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Millet plants grown in FBM, ORM and TRM plots had increased plant height, number of tillers per plant and stem diameter irrespective of differences in soil type or time of measurement.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1131–1315 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pearl Millet (Pennisetum glaucum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure-amended millet plots increased number of tillers per plant.

Taxon
Millete0
Treatment
FBM, ORM and TRMe0
Outcome
number of tillers per plante0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Millet plants grown in FBM, ORM and TRM plots had increased plant height, number of tillers per plant and stem diameter irrespective of differences in soil type or time of measurement.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1131–1315 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pearl Millet (Pennisetum glaucum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure-amended millet plots increased stem diameter.

Taxon
Millete0
Treatment
FBM, ORM and TRMe0
Outcome
stem diametere0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Millet plants grown in FBM, ORM and TRM plots had increased plant height, number of tillers per plant and stem diameter irrespective of differences in soil type or time of measurement.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1131–1315 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pearl Millet (Pennisetum glaucum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure-amended treatments increased millet leaf N, P and K contents.

Taxon
Millete0
Organ / stage
leafe0
Treatment
manure amended treatmentse0
Outcome
leaf N, P and K contentse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
un-amended treatmentse0

Verbatim

e0

“Millet leaf N, P and K contents were all higher in the manure amended treatments than in the un-amended treatments irrespective of land preparation method or location.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1316–1483 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pearl Millet (Pennisetum glaucum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FBM increased straw yield by 36.8% on sandy loam soil.

Taxon
Pearl MilletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
FBMe0
Outcome
straw yielde0
Direction
increasese0
Value
36.8%e0
Comparator
FB treatmente0
Setting
sandy loam soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mean increases in straw yield relative to the FB treatment were 36.8% for FBM, 41.8% for ORM and 47.4% for TRM on the sandy loam soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1625–1759 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pearl Millet (Pennisetum glaucum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ORM increased straw yield by 41.8% on sandy loam soil.

Taxon
Pearl MilletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
ORMe0
Outcome
straw yielde0
Direction
increasese0
Value
41.8%e0
Comparator
FB treatmente0
Setting
sandy loam soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mean increases in straw yield relative to the FB treatment were 36.8% for FBM, 41.8% for ORM and 47.4% for TRM on the sandy loam soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1625–1759 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pearl Millet (Pennisetum glaucum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TRM increased straw yield by 47.4% on sandy loam soil.

Taxon
Pearl MilletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
TRMe0
Outcome
straw yielde0
Direction
increasese0
Value
47.4%e0
Comparator
FB treatmente0
Setting
sandy loam soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mean increases in straw yield relative to the FB treatment were 36.8% for FBM, 41.8% for ORM and 47.4% for TRM on the sandy loam soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1625–1759 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pearl Millet (Pennisetum glaucum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FBM increased straw yield by 116.7% on sandy clay loam soil.

Taxon
Pearl MilletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
FBMe0
Outcome
straw yielde0
Direction
increasese0
Value
116.7%e0
Setting
sandy clay loam soile0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The corresponding increases in straw yield due to these treatments on the sandy clay loam soil were 116.7% for FBM, 81.1% for ORM and 146.7% for TRM.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1760–1909 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pearl Millet (Pennisetum glaucum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ORM increased straw yield by 81.1% on sandy clay loam soil.

Taxon
Pearl MilletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
ORMe0
Outcome
straw yielde0
Direction
increasese0
Value
81.1%e0
Setting
sandy clay loam soile0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The corresponding increases in straw yield due to these treatments on the sandy clay loam soil were 116.7% for FBM, 81.1% for ORM and 146.7% for TRM.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1760–1909 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pearl Millet (Pennisetum glaucum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TRM increased straw yield by 146.7% on sandy clay loam soil.

Taxon
Pearl MilletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
TRMe0
Outcome
straw yielde0
Direction
increasese0
Value
146.7%e0
Setting
sandy clay loam soile0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The corresponding increases in straw yield due to these treatments on the sandy clay loam soil were 116.7% for FBM, 81.1% for ORM and 146.7% for TRM.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1760–1909 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pearl Millet (Pennisetum glaucum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–130 · show in text ↑

fertilization · nutrient: content · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

75 papers: 72 positive, 3 negative or no effect

71 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

71 papers more in this group

See all 75 papers →

fertilization · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

259 papers: 249 positive, 10 negative or no effect

248 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

255 papers more in this group

See all 259 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.