Abstract
A field experiment was conducted to evaluate the bioefficacy of novel insecticides against diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella L. in cabbage at Agricultural Research Station, Mandor, Jodhpur during 2018–19. The experiment was laid out in randomized block design (RBD) with 6 treatments including untreated control. The insecticides evaluated were viz., chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC @ 40, 50, 60 ml/ha, diafenthiuron 50% WP @ 600 g/ha and chlorpyriphos 20% EC @ 2000 ml/ha against diamondback moth when pest reached economic threshold level. After two sprays, minimum larval population was recorded in the treatment chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC @ 60 ml/ha (6.38 larvae/5 plants) followed by chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC @ 50 ml/ha (6.96 larvae/5 plants). Highest yield (208.60 q/ha) was recorded in chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC @ 60 ml/ha followed by chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC @ 50 ml/ha (200.48 q/ha). Both the treatments were on par with each other and significantly superior over control in yield. All tested insecticides were safe to natural enemies viz., coccinellid beetles and had no phyotoxic effect on cabbage crop.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Chlorantraniliprole at 60 ml/ha had the minimum diamondback moth larval population, 6.38 larvae per five plants.
- Taxon
- cabbage
Brassica oleracea var. capitatae1 - Treatment
- chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC @ 60 ml/hae0
- Interactor
- Plutella xylostella L.e1pest
- Outcome
- larval populatione0
- Direction
- minimume0
- Value
- 6.38 larvae/5 plantse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“minimum larval population was recorded in the treatment chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC @ 60 ml/ha (6.38 larvae/5 plants)”
e1“diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella L. in cabbage”
Claim · model-written summary
Chlorantraniliprole at 50 ml/ha had 6.96 larvae per five plants.
- Taxon
- cabbageBrassica oleracea var. capitatae1
- Treatment
- chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC @ 50 ml/hae0
- Interactor
- Plutella xylostella L.e1pest
- Outcome
- larvae/5 plantse0
- Value
- 6.96 larvae/5 plantse0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“followed by chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC @ 50 ml/ha (6.96 larvae/5 plants)”
e1“diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella L. in cabbage”
Claim · model-written summary
Chlorantraniliprole at 60 ml/ha produced the highest cabbage yield of 208.60 q/ha.
- Taxon
- cabbageBrassica oleracea var. capitatae1
- Treatment
- chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC @ 60 ml/hae0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- Higheste0
- Value
- 208.60 q/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Highest yield (208.60 q/ha) was recorded in chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC @ 60 ml/ha”
e1“in cabbage”
Claim · model-written summary
Chlorantraniliprole at 50 ml/ha produced 200.48 q/ha cabbage yield.
- Taxon
- cabbageBrassica oleracea var. capitatae2
- Treatment
- chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC @ 50 ml/hae0
- Outcome
- yielde1
- Value
- 200.48 q/hae0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC @ 50 ml/ha (200.48 q/ha)”
e1“Highest yield (208.60 q/ha) was recorded in chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC @ 60 ml/ha followed by”
e2“in cabbage”
Claim · model-written summary
The two chlorantraniliprole rates had comparable yields and both exceeded the control significantly.
- Taxon
- cabbageBrassica oleracea var. capitatae1
- Treatment
- Both the treatmentse0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- superiore0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Both the treatments were on par with each other and significantly superior over control in yield.”
e1“in cabbage”
Claim · model-written summary
All tested insecticides were safe to coccinellid beetles.
- Taxon
- cabbageBrassica oleracea var. capitatae1
- Treatment
- All tested insecticidese0
- Interactor
- coccinellid beetlese0biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- safe to natural enemiese0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“All tested insecticides were safe to natural enemies viz., coccinellid beetles”
e1“in cabbage”
Claim · model-written summary
All tested insecticides had no phytotoxic effect on cabbage.
- Taxon
- cabbageBrassica oleracea var. capitatae0
- Treatment
- All tested insecticidese0
- Outcome
- phyotoxic effecte0
- Direction
- noe0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“All tested insecticides were safe to natural enemies viz., coccinellid beetles and had no phyotoxic effect on cabbage crop.”
The same questions in other papers
chlorantraniliprole · pest · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →chlorantraniliprole · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree
7 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →insecticide · ecology: diversity · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results
4 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.