Paper · 2022 · Indian Journal of Horticulture

Application of growth substances through tree injection in banana for increasing yield and fruiting characters

J. J. Patel; T. R. Ahlawat; S. Kumar; et al.

10
claims
36
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The present investigation was carried out on banana cv. Grand Naine, trated with nine chemical treatments viz., control (T1), GA3@ 10 ppm (T2), GA3@ 20 ppm (T3), GA3@ 30 ppm (T4), BA @ 2.5 ppm (T5), BA @ 5.0 ppm (T6), NOVEL+ @ 0.5% (T7), NOVEL+ @ 1.0% (T8), NOVEL+ @ 1.5% (T9), applied through injection at the time of bell emergence. The results revealed that the injection of GA3 @ 30 ppm (T4) tended to show the maximum bunch weight (36.38 kg), fruit yield (126.31t/ha), bunch length (101.78 cm), bunch girth (119.17 cm), finger length (22.96 cm), finger girth (13.99 cm) and finger weight (205.78 g), took minimum days from flowering to harvest (89.28). However, the maximum number of fingers per bunch (179.89) and number of hands per bunch (14.06) were observed under the injection of NOVEL+ @ 1.5% (T9) followed by GA3 @ 30 ppm (T4).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 @ 30 ppm injection tended to give the maximum bunch weight (36.38 kg) among the treatments, including control.

Taxon
bananae0
Material
Grand Nainee0
Treatment
GA3 @ 30 ppme3
Outcome
bunch weighte3
Direction
maximume3
Value
36.38 kge3
Qualifier
applied through injection at the time of bell emergencee2
Comparator
control (T1)e1

Verbatim

e0

“banana cv. Grand Naine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 45–67 · show in text ↑
e1

“control (T1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 112–124 · show in text ↑
e2

“applied through injection at the time of bell emergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–333 · show in text ↑
e3

“the injection of GA3 @ 30 ppm (T4) tended to show the maximum bunch weight (36.38 kg), fruit yield (126.31t/ha), bunch length (101.78 cm), bunch girth (119.17 cm), finger length (22.96 cm), finger girth (13.99 cm) and finger weight (205.78 g), took minimum days from flowering to harvest (89.28)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 361–656 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 @ 30 ppm injection tended to give the maximum fruit yield (126.31t/ha) among the treatments, including control.

Taxon
bananae0
Material
Grand Nainee0
Treatment
GA3 @ 30 ppme3
Outcome
fruit yielde3
Direction
maximume3
Value
126.31t/hae3
Qualifier
applied through injection at the time of bell emergencee2
Comparator
control (T1)e1

Verbatim

e0

“banana cv. Grand Naine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 45–67 · show in text ↑
e1

“control (T1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 112–124 · show in text ↑
e2

“applied through injection at the time of bell emergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–333 · show in text ↑
e3

“the injection of GA3 @ 30 ppm (T4) tended to show the maximum bunch weight (36.38 kg), fruit yield (126.31t/ha), bunch length (101.78 cm), bunch girth (119.17 cm), finger length (22.96 cm), finger girth (13.99 cm) and finger weight (205.78 g), took minimum days from flowering to harvest (89.28)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 361–656 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 @ 30 ppm injection tended to give the maximum bunch length (101.78 cm) among the treatments, including control.

Taxon
bananae0
Material
Grand Nainee0
Treatment
GA3 @ 30 ppme3
Outcome
bunch lengthe3
Direction
maximume3
Value
101.78 cme3
Qualifier
applied through injection at the time of bell emergencee2
Comparator
control (T1)e1

Verbatim

e0

“banana cv. Grand Naine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 45–67 · show in text ↑
e1

“control (T1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 112–124 · show in text ↑
e2

“applied through injection at the time of bell emergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–333 · show in text ↑
e3

“the injection of GA3 @ 30 ppm (T4) tended to show the maximum bunch weight (36.38 kg), fruit yield (126.31t/ha), bunch length (101.78 cm), bunch girth (119.17 cm), finger length (22.96 cm), finger girth (13.99 cm) and finger weight (205.78 g), took minimum days from flowering to harvest (89.28)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 361–656 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 @ 30 ppm injection tended to give the maximum bunch girth (119.17 cm) among the treatments, including control.

Taxon
bananae0
Material
Grand Nainee0
Treatment
GA3 @ 30 ppme3
Outcome
bunch girthe3
Direction
maximume3
Value
119.17 cme3
Qualifier
applied through injection at the time of bell emergencee2
Comparator
control (T1)e1

Verbatim

e0

“banana cv. Grand Naine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 45–67 · show in text ↑
e1

“control (T1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 112–124 · show in text ↑
e2

“applied through injection at the time of bell emergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–333 · show in text ↑
e3

“the injection of GA3 @ 30 ppm (T4) tended to show the maximum bunch weight (36.38 kg), fruit yield (126.31t/ha), bunch length (101.78 cm), bunch girth (119.17 cm), finger length (22.96 cm), finger girth (13.99 cm) and finger weight (205.78 g), took minimum days from flowering to harvest (89.28)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 361–656 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 @ 30 ppm injection tended to give the maximum finger length (22.96 cm) among the treatments, including control.

Taxon
bananae0
Material
Grand Nainee0
Treatment
GA3 @ 30 ppme3
Outcome
finger lengthe3
Direction
maximume3
Value
22.96 cme3
Qualifier
applied through injection at the time of bell emergencee2
Comparator
control (T1)e1

Verbatim

e0

“banana cv. Grand Naine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 45–67 · show in text ↑
e1

“control (T1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 112–124 · show in text ↑
e2

“applied through injection at the time of bell emergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–333 · show in text ↑
e3

“the injection of GA3 @ 30 ppm (T4) tended to show the maximum bunch weight (36.38 kg), fruit yield (126.31t/ha), bunch length (101.78 cm), bunch girth (119.17 cm), finger length (22.96 cm), finger girth (13.99 cm) and finger weight (205.78 g), took minimum days from flowering to harvest (89.28)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 361–656 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 @ 30 ppm injection tended to give the maximum finger girth (13.99 cm) among the treatments, including control.

Taxon
bananae0
Material
Grand Nainee0
Treatment
GA3 @ 30 ppme3
Outcome
finger girthe3
Direction
maximume3
Value
13.99 cme3
Qualifier
applied through injection at the time of bell emergencee2
Comparator
control (T1)e1

Verbatim

e0

“banana cv. Grand Naine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 45–67 · show in text ↑
e1

“control (T1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 112–124 · show in text ↑
e2

“applied through injection at the time of bell emergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–333 · show in text ↑
e3

“the injection of GA3 @ 30 ppm (T4) tended to show the maximum bunch weight (36.38 kg), fruit yield (126.31t/ha), bunch length (101.78 cm), bunch girth (119.17 cm), finger length (22.96 cm), finger girth (13.99 cm) and finger weight (205.78 g), took minimum days from flowering to harvest (89.28)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 361–656 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 @ 30 ppm injection tended to give the maximum finger weight (205.78 g) among the treatments, including control.

Taxon
bananae0
Material
Grand Nainee0
Treatment
GA3 @ 30 ppme3
Outcome
finger weighte3
Direction
maximume3
Value
205.78 ge3
Qualifier
applied through injection at the time of bell emergencee2
Comparator
control (T1)e1

Verbatim

e0

“banana cv. Grand Naine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 45–67 · show in text ↑
e1

“control (T1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 112–124 · show in text ↑
e2

“applied through injection at the time of bell emergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–333 · show in text ↑
e3

“the injection of GA3 @ 30 ppm (T4) tended to show the maximum bunch weight (36.38 kg), fruit yield (126.31t/ha), bunch length (101.78 cm), bunch girth (119.17 cm), finger length (22.96 cm), finger girth (13.99 cm) and finger weight (205.78 g), took minimum days from flowering to harvest (89.28)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 361–656 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 @ 30 ppm injection tended to give the minimum days from flowering to harvest (89.28) among the treatments, including control.

Taxon
bananae0
Material
Grand Nainee0
Treatment
GA3 @ 30 ppme3
Outcome
days from flowering to harveste3
Direction
minimume3
Value
89.28e3
Qualifier
applied through injection at the time of bell emergencee2
Comparator
control (T1)e1

Verbatim

e0

“banana cv. Grand Naine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 45–67 · show in text ↑
e1

“control (T1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 112–124 · show in text ↑
e2

“applied through injection at the time of bell emergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–333 · show in text ↑
e3

“the injection of GA3 @ 30 ppm (T4) tended to show the maximum bunch weight (36.38 kg), fruit yield (126.31t/ha), bunch length (101.78 cm), bunch girth (119.17 cm), finger length (22.96 cm), finger girth (13.99 cm) and finger weight (205.78 g), took minimum days from flowering to harvest (89.28)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 361–656 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NOVEL+ @ 1.5% injection gave the maximum number of fingers per bunch (179.89), followed by GA3 @ 30 ppm.

Taxon
bananae0
Material
Grand Nainee0
Treatment
NOVEL+ @ 1.5%e4
Outcome
number of fingers per bunche4
Direction
maximume4
Value
179.89e4
Comparator
GA3 @ 30 ppme4

Verbatim

e0

“banana cv. Grand Naine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 45–67 · show in text ↑
e4

“the maximum number of fingers per bunch (179.89) and number of hands per bunch (14.06) were observed under the injection of NOVEL+ @ 1.5% (T9) followed by GA3 @ 30 ppm (T4)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 667–839 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NOVEL+ @ 1.5% injection gave the maximum number of hands per bunch (14.06), followed by GA3 @ 30 ppm.

Taxon
bananae0
Material
Grand Nainee0
Treatment
NOVEL+ @ 1.5%e4
Outcome
number of hands per bunche4
Direction
maximume4
Value
14.06e4
Comparator
GA3 @ 30 ppme4

Verbatim

e0

“banana cv. Grand Naine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 45–67 · show in text ↑
e4

“the maximum number of fingers per bunch (179.89) and number of hands per bunch (14.06) were observed under the injection of NOVEL+ @ 1.5% (T9) followed by GA3 @ 30 ppm (T4)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 667–839 · show in text ↑

Gibberellic acid · yield · MusaResults agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Gibberellic acid · growth · MusaResults agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.