Paper · 2022 · Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical

Nutritional diagnosis of banana (Musa AAA Simmonds subgroup Cavendish) with root sap analysis1

Manfred Ricardo Palacio; Daniel Gerardo Cayón Salinas; John Jairo Mira Castillo; et al.

6
claims
14
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

ABSTRACT The status of mineral nutrients in the banana crop is commonly determined by foliar and soil analyses, which often do not present a significant relation with its production performance. This study aimed to evaluate whether the root sap analysis determines the nutritional status of plants more accurately in response to fertilization. The experiment was carried out in a completely randomized design, with three treatments (complete fertilization, traditional fertilization and no fertilization), three replicates and four plants per replicate. The contents of macro (N, P, K, Ca and Mg) and micronutrients (B, Zn, Mn, Fe and Cu) were analyzed in the root sap, leaves and soil at the base of the plant. Potassium was the macronutrient found in the highest quantity in the root sap of the fertilized and unfertilized plants, while the predominant micronutrients were Mn in the fertilized plants and Fe in the unfertilized ones. The concentrations of N, P, K, Ca and Mg in the root sap were significantly lower for no fertilization than for complete and traditional fertilization, but did not show significant diferences between the foliar and soil analyses. The root sap analysis was more sensitive than leaf analysis to diagnose the nutritional status of the banana plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium was the most abundant macronutrient in root sap of fertilized and unfertilized banana plants.

Taxon
bananat0
Organ / stage
root sape0
Outcome
Potassiume0
Direction
higheste0

Verbatim

e0

“Potassium was the macronutrient found in the highest quantity in the root sap of the fertilized and unfertilized plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–831 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–31 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manganese was the predominant root sap micronutrient in fertilized banana plants.

Taxon
bananat0
Organ / stage
root sape1
Outcome
Mne0
Direction
predominante0

Verbatim

e0

“the predominant micronutrients were Mn in the fertilized plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–902 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–31 · show in text ↑
e1

“root sap of the fertilized and unfertilized plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–831 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Iron was the predominant root sap micronutrient in unfertilized banana plants.

Taxon
bananat0
Organ / stage
root sape2
Outcome
Fee0
Direction
predominante1

Verbatim

e0

“Fe in the unfertilized ones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–934 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–31 · show in text ↑
e1

“the predominant micronutrients were Mn in the fertilized plants and Fe in the unfertilized ones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–934 · show in text ↑
e2

“Potassium was the macronutrient found in the highest quantity in the root sap of the fertilized and unfertilized plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–831 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Root sap N, P and K concentrations were significantly lower without fertilization than with complete and traditional fertilization.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
no fertilizatione0
Outcome
concentrations of N, P, Ke0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
complete and traditional fertilizatione0

Verbatim

e0

“The concentrations of N, P, K, Ca and Mg in the root sap were significantly lower for no fertilization than for complete and traditional fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–1086 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Root sap Ca and Mg concentrations were significantly lower without fertilization than with complete and traditional fertilization.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
no fertilizatione0
Outcome
Ca and Mg in the root sape0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
complete and traditional fertilizatione0

Verbatim

e0

“The concentrations of N, P, K, Ca and Mg in the root sap were significantly lower for no fertilization than for complete and traditional fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–1086 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–31 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root sap analysis was more sensitive than leaf analysis for banana nutritional diagnosis.

Taxon
bananae0
Outcome
diagnose the nutritional statuse0
Direction
more sensitivee0
Comparator
leaf analysise0

Verbatim

e0

“The root sap analysis was more sensitive than leaf analysis to diagnose the nutritional status of the banana plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1166–1281 · show in text ↑

fertilization · nutrient: content · MusaPositive and negative results

41 papers: 36 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.