Paper · 2022 · The 1st International Online Conference on Agriculture—Advances in Agricultural Science and Technology

A Novel Biopesticide Formulation for Organic Management of Aphis gossypii in Cucumber Greenhouses

Mohammad Homayoonzadeh; Mohammadjavad Ghamari; Ehssan Torabi; et al.

4
claims
7
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Intensive chemical pesticide usage in crop protection for pest control causes major pollution of the environment. Replacing chemical pesticides with biopesticide is an essential agro-ecological principle that should be considered in agro-ecosystems. In this study, a novel biopesticide formulation based on plant extract was prepared, and then aphid mortality in cucumber greenhouses was evaluated in comparison to common chemical insecticide. Our eco-friendly insecticide consists of methanolic extract of Rosmarinus officinalis (4.38 g in 1 L water) and succinic acid (0.5 g in 1 L water) in combination with Triton® X-100 (10 mL in 1 L water), canola seeds oil (10 mL in 1 L water), and potassium nitrate (5 g in 1 L water). Additionally, the common insecticide against Aphis gossypii in cucumber greenhouses is dichlorvos (Dichlorvos® 48% EC) which was applied at the recommended dose (0.6 g a.i./L). Twenty-four hours after sprayings, aphids that survived through each treatment were recorded, and mortality percentages were calculated. Results showed that in biopesticide treatment, mortality (65.6 ± 2.8%) has no significant difference compared to dichlorvos (71.1 ± 2.9%) (p = 0.0629). Finally, plant performance including numbers of leaves (p = 0.0951), flowers (p = 0.0842), fruits (p = 0.0730), and branches (p = 0.0698) were not influenced by the biopesticide application. Our results propose that the mentioned biopesticide can be used in cucumber greenhouses for aphid control with no adverse effect on plant growth and development, leading to zero-pollution tactics in crop protection, which is necessary for sustainable agriculture.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biopesticide aphid mortality did not differ significantly from dichlorvos mortality.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
biopesticide treatmente0
Outcome
mortalitye0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Value
65.6 ± 2.8%e0
Qualifier
71.1 ± 2.9%e0
Comparator
dichlorvose0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results showed that in biopesticide treatment, mortality (65.6 ± 2.8%) has no significant difference compared to dichlorvos (71.1 ± 2.9%) (p = 0.0629).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1042–1193 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biopesticide application did not significantly influence cucumber leaf, flower and fruit numbers.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
biopesticide applicatione0
Outcome
numbers of leaves (p = 0.0951), flowers (p = 0.0842), fruitse0
Direction
not influencede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant performance including numbers of leaves (p = 0.0951), flowers (p = 0.0842), fruits (p = 0.0730), and branches (p = 0.0698) were not influenced by the biopesticide application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1203–1384 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biopesticide application did not significantly influence cucumber branch number.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
biopesticide applicatione0
Outcome
branchese0
Direction
not influencede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“branches (p = 0.0698) were not influenced by the biopesticide application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1310–1384 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–85 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose the biopesticide for aphid control in cucumber greenhouses.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Outcome
can be used in cucumber greenhouses for aphid controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Our results propose that the mentioned biopesticide can be used in cucumber greenhouses for aphid control with no adverse effect on plant growth and development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1385–1545 · show in text ↑

biocontrol · pest · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

biocontrol · growth · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 11 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.