Abstract
Plant growth promoting bacterias (PGPBs) can be described as bacterial strains increasing water and nutrient uptake, gaining nitrogen and phosphorus to plants by biological nitrogen fixation and phosphate mineralization, promoting plant growth and enabling to improve the tolerance to stress factors due to mechanisms as secretion of various phytohormones, vitamins and growth regulators, restriction of ethylene synthesis with ACC deaminase activity, decreasing of pathogen damage by the secret of antibiotic and fungicidal compounds. This study was carried out in a laboratory of Field crops in Siirt University under controlled conditions. The 2 original bacterial strains (KF3B and KF63C) and 5 different priming times (control, 1, 2, 4 and 6 h) were applied on the Fırat-87 lentil variety. The study was laid out in a completely randomized design with 3 replications. It was aimed with this study that investigating effects based on bacterial biodiversity and priming time on germination characteristics and seedling growth in lentils. According to results, biodiversity-induced differences were observed in germination percentage, seedling fresh weight, seedling dry weight, seedling length and seedling vigor index while priming time significantly affected all investigated parameters except for germination percentage. However, the interaction of strains and priming times did not lead to any significant differences in traits. In conclusion, microbial diversity and priming time have a critical role on successful of the priming technique. Optimum priming time for lentils was determined as 4 hours. Besides, the strain of KF63C had a noteworthy stimulative effect on especially seedling growth in the experiment.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Bacterial strains differed in lentil germination percentage, seedling weights, length and vigor index.
- Taxon
- Lentil
Lens culinarist0 - Treatment
- bacterial strainse1
- Interactor
- bacterial strainse1symbiont
- Outcome
- germination percentage, seedling fresh weight, seedling dry weight, seedling length and seedling vigor indexe0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“in Lentil”
e0“biodiversity-induced differences were observed in germination percentage, seedling fresh weight, seedling dry weight, seedling length and seedling vigor index”
e1“The 2 original bacterial strains (KF3B and KF63C)”
Claim · model-written summary
Priming duration significantly affected investigated lentil traits other than germination percentage.
- Taxon
- Lentil
Lens culinarist0 - Treatment
- priming timee0
- Outcome
- all investigated parameters except for germination percentagee0
- Comparator
- controle1
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“in Lentil”
e0“priming time significantly affected all investigated parameters except for germination percentage”
e1“5 different priming times (control, 1, 2, 4 and 6 h)”
Claim · model-written summary
Priming time did not significantly affect lentil germination percentage.
- Taxon
- Lentil
Lens culinarist0 - Treatment
- priming timee0
- Outcome
- germination percentagee0
- Comparator
- controle1
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“in Lentil”
e0“priming time significantly affected all investigated parameters except for germination percentage”
e1“5 different priming times (control, 1, 2, 4 and 6 h)”
Claim · model-written summary
Bacterial strain and priming time interaction produced no significant differences in lentil traits.
- Taxon
- Lentil
Lens culinarist0 - Treatment
- interaction of strains and priming timese0
- Interactor
- bacterial strainse1symbiont
- Outcome
- traitse0
- Direction
- did not lead to any significant differencese0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“in Lentil”
e0“the interaction of strains and priming times did not lead to any significant differences in traits”
e1“The 2 original bacterial strains (KF3B and KF63C)”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors identified 4 hours as the optimum lentil priming time.
- Taxon
- lentils
Lens culinarise0 - Outcome
- Optimum priming timee0
- Value
- 4 hourse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Optimum priming time for lentils was determined as 4 hours.”
Claim · model-written summary
Strain KF63C stimulated lentil seedling growth.
- Taxon
- Lentil
Lens culinarist0 - Treatment
- strain of KF63Ce0
- Interactor
- KF63Ce0symbiont
- Outcome
- seedling growthe0
- Direction
- stimulativee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“in Lentil”
e0“the strain of KF63C had a noteworthy stimulative effect on especially seedling growth”
e1“The 2 original bacterial strains (KF3B and KF63C)”
The same questions in other papers
seed treatment · growth · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
23 papers more in this group
See all 27 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.