Paper · 2022 · Archives of Agriculture and Environmental Science

Effect of fertilizers and mulching on growth and yield of sweet pepper (Capsicum annum L.)

Nusrat Jahan; Tatia Biswas; M.A. Rahim; et al.

16
claims
32
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

An experiment was carried out to evaluate the effects of fertilizers and mulching on growth and yield of sweet pepper at the Horticulture Farm, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh during the period from October, 2018 to March, 2019. Two factors experiment was laid out in Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with 3 replications. The experiment consisted four (4) levels of organic and inorganic fertilizers viz., F1 (Vermicompost), F2 (Recommended dose of NPKS), F3 (50% Vermicompost + 50% Recommended dose of NPKS) and F4 (75% Vermicompost + 25% Recommended dose of NPKS); and three mulch materials viz., M0 (Control), M1 (White polythene) and M2 (Black polythene). Plot size was 1 m x 1 m. The growth and physio-morphological characters, yield attributes and yield were significantly influenced by different types of fertilizers application and mulching practices. F4 treatment (75% Vermicompost + 25% Recommended dose of NPKS) produced maximum yield per hectare (40 t/ha) and F1 (vermicompost) treatment produced minimum yield per hectare (23.07 t/ha). Fruit yield increased 12.49%, 20.01% and 28.44% higher using F4, F3 and F2, respectively compared to control treatment. Mulching material influenced fruit yield where the maximum yield per hectare (40 t/ha) were observed from the M2 (Black polythene). Fruit yield (t/ha) recorded 27.06% and 27.50% higher in M2 and M1, respectively compared to control. In case of combined treatment, the fresh weight of fruit and dry matter were found higher in M2F4 and the lowest in M0F1. The maximum yield per hectare (53.31 t/ha) was found in M2F4 and M2F4 treatment produce 201.75% higher yield (t/ha) compared to control treatment combination M0F1 (17.67 t/ha). The second and third highest was found from M2F3 and M1F4. The highest benefit cost ratio (BCR) was found in M2 F4 and it was 7.49. Black plastic mulch with combined fertilizer (vermicompost and chemical fertilizer) gives higher plant height, yield, dry matter and other yield contributing parameters. Control treatment (no mulch) with only vermicompost gives lowest result in all cases.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer and mulching practices significantly influenced pepper growth, yield attributes, and yield.

Taxon
sweet pepperCapsicum annuumt0
Treatment
different types of fertilizers application and mulching practicese0
Outcome
growth and physio-morphological characters, yield attributes and yielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The growth and physio-morphological characters, yield attributes and yield were significantly influenced by different types of fertilizers application and mulching practices.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–881 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

F4 produced the maximum yield per hectare of 40 t/ha.

Taxon
sweet pepperCapsicum annuumt0
Treatment
F4 treatment (75% Vermicompost + 25% Recommended dose of NPKS)e0
Outcome
yield per hectaree0
Direction
maximume0
Value
40 t/hae0
Comparator
F1 (vermicompost) treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“F4 treatment (75% Vermicompost + 25% Recommended dose of NPKS) produced maximum yield per hectare (40 t/ha) and F1 (vermicompost) treatment produced minimum yield per hectare (23.07 t/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–1070 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

F1 produced the minimum yield per hectare of 23.07 t/ha.

Taxon
sweet pepperCapsicum annuumt0
Treatment
F1 (vermicompost) treatmente0
Outcome
yield per hectaree0
Direction
minimume0
Value
23.07 t/hae0
Comparator
F4 treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“F4 treatment (75% Vermicompost + 25% Recommended dose of NPKS) produced maximum yield per hectare (40 t/ha) and F1 (vermicompost) treatment produced minimum yield per hectare (23.07 t/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–1070 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

F4 increased fruit yield by 12.49% versus control.

Taxon
sweet pepperCapsicum annuumt0
Treatment
F4e0
Outcome
Fruit yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
12.49%e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit yield increased 12.49%, 20.01% and 28.44% higher using F4, F3 and F2, respectively compared to control treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1071–1190 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

F3 increased fruit yield by 20.01% versus control.

Taxon
sweet pepperCapsicum annuumt0
Treatment
F3e0
Outcome
Fruit yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
20.01%e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit yield increased 12.49%, 20.01% and 28.44% higher using F4, F3 and F2, respectively compared to control treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1071–1190 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

F2 increased fruit yield by 28.44% versus control.

Taxon
sweet pepperCapsicum annuumt0
Treatment
F2e0
Outcome
Fruit yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
28.44%e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit yield increased 12.49%, 20.01% and 28.44% higher using F4, F3 and F2, respectively compared to control treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1071–1190 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Black polythene mulch produced the maximum yield of 40 t/ha.

Taxon
sweet pepperCapsicum annuumt0
Treatment
M2 (Black polythene)e0
Outcome
yield per hectaree0
Direction
maximume0
Value
40 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mulching material influenced fruit yield where the maximum yield per hectare (40 t/ha) were observed from the M2 (Black polythene).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1322 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M2 fruit yield was 27.06% higher than control.

Taxon
sweet pepperCapsicum annuumt0
Treatment
M2e0
Outcome
Fruit yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
27.06%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit yield (t/ha) recorded 27.06% and 27.50% higher in M2 and M1, respectively compared to control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1323–1423 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M1 fruit yield was 27.50% higher than control.

Taxon
sweet pepperCapsicum annuumt0
Treatment
M1e0
Outcome
Fruit yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
27.50%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit yield (t/ha) recorded 27.06% and 27.50% higher in M2 and M1, respectively compared to control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1323–1423 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M2F4 gave higher fruit fresh weight and dry matter than M0F1.

Taxon
sweet pepperCapsicum annuumt0
Treatment
M2F4e0
Outcome
fresh weight of fruit and dry mattere0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
M0F1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In case of combined treatment, the fresh weight of fruit and dry matter were found higher in M2F4 and the lowest in M0F1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1424–1545 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M2F4 gave the maximum yield, 53.31 t/ha.

Taxon
sweet pepperCapsicum annuumt0
Treatment
M2F4e0
Outcome
yield per hectaree0
Direction
maximume0
Value
53.31 t/hae0
Comparator
M0F1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum yield per hectare (53.31 t/ha) was found in M2F4 and M2F4 treatment produce 201.75% higher yield (t/ha) compared to control treatment combination M0F1 (17.67 t/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1546–1722 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M2F4 yield was 201.75% higher than M0F1.

Taxon
sweet pepperCapsicum annuumt0
Treatment
M2F4e0
Outcome
yield (t/ha)e0
Direction
highere0
Value
201.75%e0
Comparator
M0F1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum yield per hectare (53.31 t/ha) was found in M2F4 and M2F4 treatment produce 201.75% higher yield (t/ha) compared to control treatment combination M0F1 (17.67 t/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1546–1722 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–70 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M2F3 had the second highest yield.

Taxon
sweet pepperCapsicum annuumt0
Treatment
M2F3e0
Outcome
seconde0
Direction
second and third higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The second and third highest was found from M2F3 and M1F4.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1723–1781 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–70 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M1F4 had the third highest yield.

Taxon
sweet pepperCapsicum annuumt0
Treatment
M1F4e0
Outcome
third higheste0
Direction
third higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The second and third highest was found from M2F3 and M1F4.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1723–1781 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–70 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M2 F4 had the highest benefit cost ratio, 7.49.

Taxon
sweet pepperCapsicum annuumt0
Treatment
M2 F4e0
Outcome
benefit cost ratio (BCR)e0
Direction
higheste0
Value
7.49e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest benefit cost ratio (BCR) was found in M2 F4 and it was 7.49.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1782–1854 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Black plastic mulch with combined fertilizer gave higher height, yield, dry matter and related traits.

Taxon
sweet pepperCapsicum annuumt0
Treatment
Black plastic mulch with combined fertilizer (vermicompost and chemical fertilizer)e0
Outcome
plant height, yield, dry mattere0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Black plastic mulch with combined fertilizer (vermicompost and chemical fertilizer) gives higher plant height, yield, dry matter and other yield contributing parameters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1855–2024 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–70 · show in text ↑

poly(ethylene) · yield · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

mulching · yield · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 35 positive, 2 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

fertilization · yield · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Positive and negative results

168 papers: 141 positive, 27 negative or no effect

140 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

164 papers more in this group

See all 168 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.