Paper · 2022 · Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection

Reduced efficacy of biocontrol agents and plant resistance inducers against potato early blight from greenhouse to field

Linnea J. Stridh; Hadis Mostafanezhad; Christian B. Andersen; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
40
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Early blight in potato, caused by Alternaria solani , is mainly controlled by frequent applications of synthetic fungicides. Reducing the use of synthetic fungicides in agriculture is desired to reach an overall sustainable development since the active components can be harmful for humans and for the ecosystem. In integrated pest management, IPM, the idea is to combine various measures, including optimized crop management, crop rotation, use of resistant cultivars, biological control agents (BCAs), plant resistance inducers, and fertilizers, to decrease the dependence on traditional chemical fungicides. In this paper, we present the results from greenhouse and field trials where we evaluated the effect of strategies aimed at reducing our reliance on synthetic fungicides including treatments with biological control agents (BCAs) ( Pythium oligandrum , Polygandron ® , and Bacillus subtilis , Serenade ® ) and plant resistance inducers (silicon products HortiStar ® and Actisil ® ) for early blight in potato. The agents were applied separately or in combination with each other or with synthetic fungicides. In the greenhouse, trials application of these agents resulted in 50–95% reduction of infection by A. solani , but their combination did not generally improve the outcome. However, the effects were much smaller in the hand-sprayed field trials, 20–25% disease reduction and almost disappeared in full-scale field trials where application was done with tractor sprayers. In this article, we discuss possible reasons behind the drop in efficacy from greenhouse trials to full-size field evaluation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tested agents reduced potato infection by A. solani by 50–95% in greenhouse trials.

Treatment
application of these agentse0
Interactor
A. solaniAlternaria solanie0pathogen
Outcome
infection by A. solanie0
Direction
reductione0
Value
50–95%e0
Setting
greenhousee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Alternaria solani
Alternaria solani · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the greenhouse, trials application of these agents resulted in 50–95% reduction of infection by A. solani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1128–1236 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combining the agents did not generally improve potato early blight control.

Treatment
their combinatione0
Outcome
early blightt0
Direction
did not generally improvee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but their combination did not generally improve the outcome.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1239–1299 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato early blight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand-sprayed field trials showed only 20–25% disease reduction, much smaller than greenhouse effects.

Treatment
hand-sprayede0
Outcome
diseasee0
Direction
reductione0
Value
20–25%e0
Setting
field trialse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, the effects were much smaller in the hand-sprayed field trials, 20–25% disease reduction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1300–1397 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato early blight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment effects almost disappeared in full-scale potato field trials using tractor sprayers.

Treatment
application was done with tractor sprayerse0
Outcome
disease reductione0
Direction
almost disappearede0
Setting
full-scale field trialse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, the effects were much smaller in the hand-sprayed field trials, 20–25% disease reduction and almost disappeared in full-scale field trials where application was done with tractor sprayers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1300–1497 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato early blight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–95 · show in text ↑

application · control · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 19 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.