Paper · 2022 · Annals of Agricultural Sciences

Different wheat intercropping systems with tomato to alleviate chilling stress, increase yield and profitability

Ahmed M. Sheha; Amira A. El-Mehy; Ahmed S. Mohamed; et al.

7
claims
10
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Chilling temperature stress is the largest factor affecting tomato performance. Under these conditions, tomato cultivations require protection from cold and frost waves. A field study was conducted to investigate the effect of three wheat sowing dates (November 1st; November 15th and December 1st), and three wheat seeding rates of 25, 37.5, and 50 % of the normal seeding rate (142.8 kg seeds/ha) on the following aspects: yield and yield components of both crops, land equivalent ratio (LER), area time equivalent ratio (ATER), and economic return. The results revealed that intercropping wheat with tomato in mid-November, coupled with a 50 % seeding rate, produced the highest values of fruit setting (%), yield components, and total fruit yield/ha of tomato during both seasons. The climatic conditions prevailing on November 15th favored the increase of grain, straw yield/ha, and yield components compared to the other sowing dates. The density of the wheat seeding rate at 50 % produced the highest grain and straw yield/ha. In addition, intercropping wheat with tomato at a 50 % seeding rate on November 15th led to the highest values of LER (1.77 and 1.80) and ATER (1.35 and 1.36) and increased the net return by 106.6 and 112.0 % compared to the sole tomato cultivation in 1st and 2nd seasons, respectively. These results indicate that intercropping wheat with tomato on November 15th at a 50 % seeding rate can better protect tomato plants from chilling and frost waves.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mid-November wheat intercropping at 50% seeding gave the highest tomato fruit setting, yield components and total fruit yield.

Treatment
intercropping wheat with tomato in mid-November, coupled with a 50 % seeding ratee0
Outcome
fruit setting (%), yield components, and total fruit yield/ha of tomatoe0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
during both seasonse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat intercropping systems with tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–49 · show in text ↑
e0

“intercropping wheat with tomato in mid-November, coupled with a 50 % seeding rate, produced the highest values of fruit setting (%), yield components, and total fruit yield/ha of tomato during both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–784 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

November 15th wheat sowing increased wheat grain and straw yield and yield components over other dates.

Treatment
November 15the0
Outcome
grain, straw yield/ha, and yield componentse0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
other sowing datese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The climatic conditions prevailing on November 15th favored the increase of grain, straw yield/ha, and yield components compared to the other sowing dates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–940 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–15 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 50% wheat seeding rate gave the highest grain and straw yield.

Treatment
wheat seeding rate at 50 %e0
Outcome
grain and straw yield/hae0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The density of the wheat seeding rate at 50 % produced the highest grain and straw yield/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 941–1033 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The November 15th, 50% intercrop had LER values of 1.77 and 1.80.

Taxon
wheat with tomatoe0
Treatment
50 % seeding rate on November 15the0
Outcome
LERe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1.77 and 1.80e0

Verbatim

e0

“intercropping wheat with tomato at a 50 % seeding rate on November 15th led to the highest values of LER (1.77 and 1.80) and ATER (1.35 and 1.36)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1192 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The November 15th, 50% intercrop had ATER values of 1.35 and 1.36.

Taxon
wheat with tomatoe0
Treatment
50 % seeding rate on November 15the0
Outcome
ATERe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1.35 and 1.36e0

Verbatim

e0

“intercropping wheat with tomato at a 50 % seeding rate on November 15th led to the highest values of LER (1.77 and 1.80) and ATER (1.35 and 1.36)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1192 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The November 15th, 50% intercrop increased net returns by 106.6 and 112.0% over sole tomato in seasons one and two.

Taxon
wheat with tomatoe0
Treatment
intercropping wheat with tomato at a 50 % seeding rate on November 15the0
Outcome
net returne1
Direction
increasede1
Value
106.6 and 112.0 %e1
Comparator
sole tomato cultivatione1

Verbatim

e0

“intercropping wheat with tomato at a 50 % seeding rate on November 15th”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1118 · show in text ↑
e1

“increased the net return by 106.6 and 112.0 % compared to the sole tomato cultivation in 1st and 2nd seasons, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1197–1320 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that November 15th, 50% wheat intercropping can better protect tomato from chilling and frost.

Treatment
intercropping wheat with tomato on November 15th at a 50 % seeding ratee0
Outcome
better protect tomato plants from chilling and frost wavese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“intercropping wheat with tomato on November 15th at a 50 % seeding rate can better protect tomato plants from chilling and frost waves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1349–1484 · show in text ↑

Triticum aestivum · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 6 positive, 5 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

intercropping · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

46 papers: 41 positive, 5 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

density · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

60 papers: 48 positive, 12 negative or no effect

47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

56 papers more in this group

See all 60 papers →

density · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

498 papers: 376 positive, 122 negative or no effect

375 papers in the same direction as this paper · 115 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

494 papers more in this group

See all 498 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.