Paper · 2022 · Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science

CO2 elevation and nutrient patchiness interactively affect morphology, nitrogen uptake, partitioning and use efficiency of Nicotiana tabacum L. (tobacco) during anthesis

Lin Zhang; Guitong Li; Caibin Li; et al.

6
claims
17
verbatim quotes
3
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract The stimulation effect of elevated [CO 2 ] ( e [CO 2 ]) on plant growth is modulated by nitrogen (N) availability, yet the mechanisms of this modulation under patchy N supply remain largely elusive. This study aimed to investigate the mechanisms by which patchy nutrient supply in the root‐zone influence on N uptake, partitioning and use efficiency of tobacco plants ( Nicotiana tabacum L.) grown under e [CO 2 ]. A split‐root pot experiment was conducted on tobacco plants grown at ambient ( a [CO 2 ], 400 μmol L −1 ) and e [CO 2 ] (800 μmol L −1 ) conditions during anthesis. Plants were subjected to two fertilizer levels [0 and 113‐29‐214 (N‐P‐K) mg kg −1 soil] and three fertilization regimes (partial root‐zone fertilization, PRN, couple root‐zone fertilization, CRN and no fertilization, CK). Elevated [CO 2 ] significantly decreased N concentrations in all tobacco organs, with the greatest reduction in leaves. Positive responses of tobacco biomass and NUE to e [CO 2 ] were recorded, and a large amount of 15 N labelled fertilizer‐N was partitioned to stems at the expense to leaves. Compared to the partially fertilized root, an equal N concentration was observed in the non‐fertilized root. In addition, compared with CRN, PRN increased the root exudates of sugar and organic acid; however, the increased root biomass by nutrient patchiness did not enhance plant total N uptake. Collectively, e [CO 2 ] could sustain N assimilation and distribution of tobacco plants in response to natural heterogeneous nutrient available in the soil caused by patchy fertilization.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 significantly decreased N concentrations in all tobacco organs, most in leaves.

Taxon
Nicotiana tabacum L.Nicotiana tabacumt0
Organ / stage
all tobacco organse0
Treatment
Elevated [CO 2 ]e0
Outcome
N concentrationse0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
during anthesise6
Comparator
ambiente6
Setting
split‐root pot experimente6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Nicotiana tabacum L. (tobacco)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–153 · show in text ↑
e0

“Elevated [CO 2 ] significantly decreased N concentrations in all tobacco organs, with the greatest reduction in leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–929 · show in text ↑
e6

“A split‐root pot experiment was conducted on tobacco plants grown at ambient ( a [CO 2 ], 400 μmol L −1 ) and e [CO 2 ] (800 μmol L −1 ) conditions during anthesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 424–587 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 gave positive responses of tobacco biomass and nitrogen use efficiency.

Taxon
Nicotiana tabacum L.Nicotiana tabacumt0
Treatment
e [CO 2 ]e1
Outcome
biomass and NUEe1
Direction
Positive responsese1
Comparator
ambiente6
Setting
split‐root pot experimente6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Nicotiana tabacum L. (tobacco)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–153 · show in text ↑
e1

“Positive responses of tobacco biomass and NUE to e [CO 2 ] were recorded”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 931–1003 · show in text ↑
e6

“A split‐root pot experiment was conducted on tobacco plants grown at ambient ( a [CO 2 ], 400 μmol L −1 ) and e [CO 2 ] (800 μmol L −1 ) conditions during anthesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 424–587 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A large amount of fertilizer-derived 15N was partitioned to tobacco stems at the expense of leaves.

Taxon
Nicotiana tabacum L.Nicotiana tabacumt0
Organ / stage
stemse2
Outcome
partitioned to stemse2
Comparator
leavese2
Setting
split‐root pot experimente6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Nicotiana tabacum L. (tobacco)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–153 · show in text ↑
e2

“a large amount of 15 N labelled fertilizer‐N was partitioned to stems at the expense to leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1009–1103 · show in text ↑
e6

“A split‐root pot experiment was conducted on tobacco plants grown at ambient ( a [CO 2 ], 400 μmol L −1 ) and e [CO 2 ] (800 μmol L −1 ) conditions during anthesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 424–587 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The non-fertilized root had an N concentration equal to that of the partially fertilized root.

Taxon
Nicotiana tabacum L.Nicotiana tabacumt0
Treatment
non‐fertilized roote3
Outcome
N concentratione3
Direction
equale3
Comparator
partially fertilized roote3
Setting
split‐root pot experimente6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Nicotiana tabacum L. (tobacco)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–153 · show in text ↑
e3

“Compared to the partially fertilized root, an equal N concentration was observed in the non‐fertilized root”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1212 · show in text ↑
e6

“A split‐root pot experiment was conducted on tobacco plants grown at ambient ( a [CO 2 ], 400 μmol L −1 ) and e [CO 2 ] (800 μmol L −1 ) conditions during anthesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 424–587 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PRN increased root exudates of sugar and organic acid compared with CRN.

Taxon
Nicotiana tabacum L.Nicotiana tabacumt0
Treatment
PRNe4
Outcome
root exudates of sugar and organic acide4
Direction
increasede4
Comparator
CRNe4
Setting
split‐root pot experimente6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Nicotiana tabacum L. (tobacco)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–153 · show in text ↑
e4

“compared with CRN, PRN increased the root exudates of sugar and organic acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1227–1303 · show in text ↑
e6

“A split‐root pot experiment was conducted on tobacco plants grown at ambient ( a [CO 2 ], 400 μmol L −1 ) and e [CO 2 ] (800 μmol L −1 ) conditions during anthesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 424–587 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased root biomass from nutrient patchiness did not enhance plant total N uptake.

Taxon
Nicotiana tabacum L.Nicotiana tabacumt0
Treatment
nutrient patchinesse5
Outcome
plant total N uptakee5
Direction
did not enhancee5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Nicotiana tabacum L. (tobacco)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–153 · show in text ↑
e5

“the increased root biomass by nutrient patchiness did not enhance plant total N uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1314–1400 · show in text ↑

co2 · growth · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 12 positive, 6 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.