Paper · 2022 · Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity

Morpho-physiological responses of iaa9 tomato mutants to different levels of PEG simulated drought stress

ERNI SUMINAR; RAHMAT BUDIARTO; ANNE NURAINI; et al.

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
11
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

Abstract. Suminar E, Budiarto R, Nuraini A, Mubarok S, Ezura H. 2022. Morpho-physiologicalresponsesof iaa9 tomato mutants to different levels of PEG simulated drought stress. Biodiversitas 23: 3115-3126.This study aimed to analyze the morphological and physiological responses of iaa9 mutants and its WT-MT to different levels of drought stress in in vitro growing medium. This study applied a completely randomized design with two factors, i.e., tomato genotypes and polyethylene glycol (PEG) - induced drought stress levels. The factor of varieties consisted of three levels, i.e., WT-MT as control (G1), iaa9-3(G2), and iaa9-5 (G3). The factor of PEG-induced drought stress also consisted of four levels, i.e., 0% PEG as control (PEG0), 5% PEG (PEG5), 10% PEG (PEG10), and 15% PEG (PEG15). The results observed 12 weeks after culture showed the variations of the morpho-physiological response of WT-MT and mutant genotypes to PEG-induced in vitro drought stress. The WT-MT showed a higher reduction in plantlet height, root number, and root length than mutants under severe drought conditions. The plantlet fresh and dry weight of iaa9-3and iaa9-5were higher than its WT-MT under no drought conditions. The total chlorophyll content of WT-MT was lower than iaa9-5due to the significant gain of chlorophyll-b on that mutant rather than its WT-MT. However, the analysis of principal components and correlation revealed the reduction of morphological size and leaf pigment content in response to drought stress, irrespective of genotype factor. These results suggest that in vitro selection techniques using PEG is useful for the initial screening of drought-tolerant tomato.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under severe drought, wild-type tomato had a greater reduction in plantlet height, root number, and root length than the mutants.

Material
WT-MTe0
Treatment
severe drought conditionse0
Outcome
plantlet height, root number, and root lengthe0
Direction
higher reductione0
Comparator
mutantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The WT-MT showed a higher reduction in plantlet height, root number, and root length than mutants under severe drought conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 966–1095 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato mutants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–53 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Without drought, iaa9-3 and iaa9-5 had higher plantlet fresh and dry weight than WT-MT.

Material
iaa9-3and iaa9-5e0
Outcome
plantlet fresh and dry weighte0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
under no drought conditionse0
Comparator
WT-MTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The plantlet fresh and dry weight of iaa9-3and iaa9-5were higher than its WT-MT under no drought conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1097–1204 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato mutants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–53 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

WT-MT had lower total chlorophyll content than iaa9-5.

Material
WT-MTe0
Outcome
total chlorophyll contente0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
iaa9-5e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The total chlorophyll content of WT-MT was lower than iaa9-5due to the significant gain of chlorophyll-b on that mutant rather than its WT-MT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1206–1347 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato mutants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–53 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The iaa9-5 mutant had a significant gain of chlorophyll-b relative to WT-MT.

Material
iaa9-5e1
Outcome
chlorophyll-be0
Direction
gaine0
Comparator
WT-MTe0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“significant gain of chlorophyll-b on that mutant rather than its WT-MT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1277–1347 · show in text ↑
e1

“iaa9-5due to the significant gain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1260–1293 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress reduced tomato morphological size and leaf pigment content regardless of genotype.

Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
morphological size and leaf pigment contente0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reduction of morphological size and leaf pigment content in response to drought stress, irrespective of genotype factor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1424–1543 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato mutants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–53 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest PEG-based in vitro selection for initial screening of drought-tolerant tomato.

Treatment
PEGe0
Outcome
initial screening of drought-tolerant tomatoe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in vitro selection techniques using PEG is useful for the initial screening of drought-tolerant tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1572–1674 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: pigments · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

35 papers: 6 positive, 29 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.