Paper · 2022 · Agriculture

Carbonated Irrigation Assessment of Grapevine Growth, Nutrient Absorption, and Sugar Accumulation in a Tempranillo (Vitis vinifera L.) Vineyard

Miriam Lampreave; Assumpta Mateos; Josep Valls; et al.

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
7
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Iron chlorosis is common in vineyards grown on calcareous soils, and consists of a chlorophyll deficiency caused by a disorder in iron nutrition. It is manifested by interveinal yellowing of the youngest leaves and decreased growth and production. Most of the vineyards in Spain are planted on calcareous soils, so iron chlorosis is frequent, even in tolerant rootstocks. In the case of Spain, Tempranillo accounts for 20.8% of the total Spanish wine area, with this red variety being the most planted. The study of iron chlorosis and the availability of nutrients is essential for improving the qualitative balance of the wine, as it is one of the most representative in our country. The aim of this work was to evaluate how carbonated irrigation modifies soil pH and increases the absorption of nutrients, as well as to assess the impact of chlorosis on the physiology of the variety and the composition of the grape. In the first instance, a test was carried out on bare soil of calcareous composition, evaluating three different levels of carbonated water, and seeing what response it gave to the pH level. The result showed that the dose of 400 ppm of CO2 provided the optimal pH. Subsequently, in a potted soil, the dose of 400 ppm of CO2 was evaluated on the variety cv. Tempranillo, in three different compositions of calcareous soil. Results showed that carbonated irrigation increased the levels of chlorophyll impacting on primary metabolism (acids and sugar), plant growth, and higher crop yield, improving the optimal grape ripeness. Given that irrigation with 400 ppm CO2 increased the ability to control ferric chlorosis, this strategy could be an easy-to-use alternative to iron-based chelates for preventing Fe deficiency in the grapevine as well as moderating the different levels of iron chlorosis. This strategy could be an alternative to the use of synthetic Fe chelates as EDTA or o,o-EDDHA for preventing Fe chlorosis in susceptible Tempranillo (Vitis vinifera L.) vineyard in calcareous soils, with less of a risk to the environment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A dose of 400 ppm CO2 gave optimal soil pH.

Taxon
GrapevineVitist0
Outcome
optimal pHe0
Value
400 ppm of CO2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the dose of 400 ppm of CO2 provided the optimal pH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1134–1184 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbonated irrigation increased chlorophyll in Tempranillo.

Taxon
Tempranillo (Vitis vinifera L.)Vitis viniferat0
Treatment
carbonated irrigatione0
Outcome
levels of chlorophylle0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“carbonated irrigation increased the levels of chlorophyll”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1363–1420 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tempranillo (Vitis vinifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–134 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbonated irrigation affected acids and sugar in Tempranillo.

Taxon
Tempranillo (Vitis vinifera L.)Vitis viniferat0
Treatment
carbonated irrigatione0
Outcome
primary metabolism (acids and sugar)e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“carbonated irrigation increased the levels of chlorophyll impacting on primary metabolism (acids and sugar)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1363–1470 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tempranillo (Vitis vinifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–134 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbonated irrigation increased plant growth and crop yield and improved grape ripeness.

Taxon
Tempranillo (Vitis vinifera L.)Vitis viniferat0
Treatment
carbonated irrigatione0
Outcome
plant growth, and higher crop yield, improving the optimal grape ripenesse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“carbonated irrigation increased the levels of chlorophyll impacting on primary metabolism (acids and sugar), plant growth, and higher crop yield, improving the optimal grape ripeness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1363–1545 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tempranillo (Vitis vinifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–134 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation with 400 ppm CO2 increased control of ferric chlorosis.

Taxon
Tempranillo (Vitis vinifera L.)Vitis viniferat0
Treatment
irrigation with 400 ppm CO2e0
Outcome
ability to control ferric chlorosise0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“irrigation with 400 ppm CO2 increased the ability to control ferric chlorosis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1558–1635 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tempranillo (Vitis vinifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–134 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors propose carbonated irrigation as an alternative to synthetic Fe chelates for Tempranillo chlorosis.

Taxon
Tempranillo (Vitis vinifera L.)Vitis viniferae0
Outcome
alternative to the use of synthetic Fe chelates as EDTA or o,o-EDDHA for preventing Fe chlorosise0
Setting
calcareous soilse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This strategy could be an alternative to the use of synthetic Fe chelates as EDTA or o,o-EDDHA for preventing Fe chlorosis in susceptible Tempranillo (Vitis vinifera L.) vineyard in calcareous soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1818–2016 · show in text ↑

co2 · physiology: pigments · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

irrigation · molecular: metabolites · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 15 positive, 6 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

irrigation · yield · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 24 positive, 17 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

irrigation · physiology: pigments · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.