Paper · 2022 · Agronomy Journal

Pearl millet yields and yield stability under long‐term soil fertility management in the Sahel

Aboubacar Dan Kassoua Tawaye Iliasso; Ibrahim Ali; Fatondji Dougbedji; et al.

10
claims
14
verbatim quotes
7
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Little is known about the impact of long‐term fertilizer microdose on pearl millet [ Cenchrus americanus (L.) Morrone] yields and yield stability in the Sahel. An 8‐yr, long‐term experiment evaluated pearl millet yields and yield stability under fertilizer microdose along with crop residues (CRs) management in different plant spacings. Treatments included (a) one absolute control (without fertilizer) and two fertilizer microdose options, (b) 2 g diammonium phosphate fertilizer per planting hole, and (c) 6 g of 15–15–15 (N–P–K) fertilizer per planting hole—under two plant spacings (10,000 and 15,000 pockets ha –1 ) and with and without CR removal. These were arranged in a randomized complete block design with three replications. A decrease in pearl millet plant spacing (15,000 pockets ha –1 ) markedly enhanced pearl millet grain yield and total dry matter by 12 and 11%, respectively, vs. the recommended plant spacing (10,000 pockets ha –1 ). The mean pearl millet grain yields over 8 yr were 470 and 262 kg ha –1 in fertilizer microdose and control plots, respectively. The pearl millet yields increased by 7 and 81% with CR retention in microdose and control plots, respectively, vs. plots with CR removal. Grain yields reductions of 16 and 38% were recorded in fertilizer microdose and control plots, respectively, after 8 yr regardless of CR retention. Fertilizer microdose without CR removal was more stable. However, a considerable decrease in soil N status was observed after 8 yr. These results suggest that fertilizer microdose in combination with CR retention should be used as a base practice for increasing yield in the low‐input, pearl millet‐based cropping system of the Sahel and similar cropping systems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Closer spacing raised pearl millet grain yield by 12%.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanuse0
Treatment
15,000 pockets ha –1e0
Outcome
pearl millet grain yielde0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
12e0
Comparator
10,000 pockets ha –1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A decrease in pearl millet plant spacing (15,000 pockets ha –1 ) markedly enhanced pearl millet grain yield and total dry matter by 12 and 11%, respectively, vs. the recommended plant spacing (10,000 pockets ha –1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–962 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Closer spacing raised total dry matter by 11%.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanuse0
Treatment
15,000 pockets ha –1e0
Outcome
total dry mattere0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
11%e0
Comparator
10,000 pockets ha –1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A decrease in pearl millet plant spacing (15,000 pockets ha –1 ) markedly enhanced pearl millet grain yield and total dry matter by 12 and 11%, respectively, vs. the recommended plant spacing (10,000 pockets ha –1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–962 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean grain yield over eight years was 470 kg ha –1 under fertilizer microdose versus 262 kg ha –1 in control plots.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanuse0
Treatment
fertilizer microdosee0
Outcome
pearl millet grain yieldse0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
470e0
Qualifier
262 kg ha –1e0
Comparator
control plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The mean pearl millet grain yields over 8 yr were 470 and 262 kg ha –1 in fertilizer microdose and control plots, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1090 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crop residue retention increased yields by 7% in microdose plots.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanuse0
Treatment
CR retentione0
Outcome
pearl millet yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
7e0
Qualifier
microdosee0
Comparator
CR removale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The pearl millet yields increased by 7 and 81% with CR retention in microdose and control plots, respectively, vs. plots with CR removal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1092–1228 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crop residue retention increased yields by 81% in control plots.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanuse0
Treatment
CR retentione0
Outcome
pearl millet yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
81%e0
Qualifier
control plotse0
Comparator
CR removale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The pearl millet yields increased by 7 and 81% with CR retention in microdose and control plots, respectively, vs. plots with CR removal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1092–1228 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield fell 16% after eight years in microdose plots.

Taxon
Pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Outcome
Grain yieldse0
Direction
reductionse0
Value
16e0
Qualifier
fertilizer microdosee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pearl millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–12 · show in text ↑
e0

“Grain yields reductions of 16 and 38% were recorded in fertilizer microdose and control plots, respectively, after 8 yr regardless of CR retention”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1230–1376 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield fell 38% after eight years in control plots.

Taxon
Pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Outcome
Grain yieldse0
Direction
reductionse0
Value
38%e0
Qualifier
control plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pearl millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–12 · show in text ↑
e0

“Grain yields reductions of 16 and 38% were recorded in fertilizer microdose and control plots, respectively, after 8 yr regardless of CR retention”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1230–1376 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microdose without crop residue removal had more stable yield.

Taxon
Pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
Fertilizer microdose without CR removale0
Outcome
stablee0
Direction
more stablee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pearl millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–12 · show in text ↑
e0

“Fertilizer microdose without CR removal was more stable”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1378–1433 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil nitrogen status decreased after eight years.

Taxon
Pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Outcome
soil N statuse0
Direction
decreasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pearl millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–12 · show in text ↑
e0

“a considerable decrease in soil N status was observed after 8 yr”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1444–1508 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend fertilizer microdose with crop residue retention as a base practice to increase yield.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanuse0
Outcome
fertilizer microdose in combination with CR retention should be used as a base practicee0
Setting
Sahele0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fertilizer microdose in combination with CR retention should be used as a base practice for increasing yield in the low‐input, pearl millet‐based cropping system of the Sahel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1537–1711 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

259 papers: 249 positive, 10 negative or no effect

248 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

255 papers more in this group

See all 259 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.