Paper · 2022 · Journal of Cereal Research

Physiology of heat and drought tolerance in wheat: An overview

Manya Tyagi; Girish Chandra Pandey

11
claims
20
verbatim quotes
20
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Wheat crop often gets exposed to drought and high temperature during grain growth particularly in subtropical conditions. Physiology of wheat is adversely affected by heat stress and drought stress. Heat and drought tolerance are influenced by some of the physiological traits such as increased rates of photosynthesis, stay green, chlorophyll concentration, chlorophyll fluorescence, and so on. Under drought stress wheat yield is mostly decreased by half or less of the irrigated control. Drought stress (60% relative soil moisture content) has been found to decrease the grain yield by more reduction in the kernel weight than the grain. Hence, any efforts to improve grain yield of wheat under these stresses should consider insights into the mechanisms of grain development and also the physiological traits when plants experience terminal stress. For improvement of grain weight of wheat under abiotic stress conditions caused by drought and high temperature found that drought stress decreased the grain yield per spike by 16.2% in the tolerant cultivar and by 27.9% in sensitive cultivar. But under combined heat and drought stress, the same cultivar did not show high tolerance. High temperature significantly reduced the grain weight and number of grains in wheat. Some other studies have reported that post anthesis rise in ambient temperature resulted in reduction in individual grain weight. So, it can be concluded that for the sustainability of the agriculture heat stress and drought are the major barrier in the field.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedreview summarynegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Heat and drought adversely affect wheat physiology.

Treatment
heat stress and drought stresse0
Outcome
Physiology of wheate0
Direction
adversely affectede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Physiology of wheat is adversely affected by heat stress and drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 122–197 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedreview summarybasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Drought tolerance is associated with photosynthesis, stay green, chlorophyll concentration, and fluorescence traits.

Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
Heat and drought tolerancee0
Qualifier
physiological traitse0

Not reportedOrgan / stageDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Heat and drought tolerance are influenced by some of the physiological traits such as increased rates of photosynthesis, stay green, chlorophyll concentration, chlorophyll fluorescence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 199–383 · show in text ↑
e1

“Physiology of wheat is adversely affected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 122–163 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedreview summarynegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat yield under drought is mostly half or less than under irrigation.

Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
wheat yielde0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
half or lesse0
Comparator
irrigated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under drought stress wheat yield is mostly decreased by half or less of the irrigated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 396–489 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedreview summarynegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Drought at 60% relative soil moisture reduced wheat grain yield.

Treatment
Drought stress (60% relative soil moisture content)e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
decreasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought stress (60% relative soil moisture content) has been found to decrease the grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 491–585 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–49 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedreview summarynegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Kernel weight fell more than grain number under drought.

Outcome
kernel weighte0
Direction
more reductione0
Comparator
the graine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“more reduction in the kernel weight than the grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–639 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–49 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedreview summarynegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Drought decreased grain yield per spike by 16.2% in the tolerant cultivar.

Material
tolerant cultivare0
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
grain yield per spikee0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
16.2%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drought stress decreased the grain yield per spike by 16.2% in the tolerant cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1060 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–49 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedreview summarynegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Drought decreased grain yield per spike by 27.9% in the sensitive cultivar.

Material
sensitive cultivare0
Treatment
drought stresse1
Outcome
grain yield per spikee1
Direction
decreasede1
Value
27.9%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“by 27.9% in sensitive cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1065–1095 · show in text ↑
e1

“drought stress decreased the grain yield per spike”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1026 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–49 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedreview summarynegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The drought tolerant cultivar did not show high tolerance under combined heat and drought.

Material
tolerant cultivare1
Treatment
combined heat and drought stresse0
Outcome
did not show high tolerancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under combined heat and drought stress, the same cultivar did not show high tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1101–1186 · show in text ↑
e1

“the tolerant cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1039–1060 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–49 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedreview summarynegativesignificant (as stated)basis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

High temperature significantly reduced wheat grain weight and grain number.

Treatment
High temperaturee0
Outcome
grain weight and number of grainse0
Direction
reducede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“High temperature significantly reduced the grain weight and number of grains in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1188–1273 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedreview summarynegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Temperature rise after anthesis reduced individual wheat grain weight.

Treatment
post anthesis rise in ambient temperaturee0
Outcome
individual grain weighte0
Direction
reductione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“post anthesis rise in ambient temperature resulted in reduction in individual grain weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1313–1403 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–49 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationreview summarybasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend accounting for grain development mechanisms and physiological traits when improving wheat yield under terminal stress.

Outcome
should consider insights into the mechanisms of grain development and also the physiological traitse0
Qualifier
terminal stresse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“efforts to improve grain yield of wheat under these stresses should consider insights into the mechanisms of grain development and also the physiological traits when plants experience terminal stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–851 · show in text ↑