Paper · 2022 · Plant Disease

Anastomosis Groups ofRhizoctonia solaniand BinucleateRhizoctoniaAssociated with Potatoes in Idaho

J. W. Woodhall; L. Brown; M. Harrington; et al.

14
claims
14
verbatim quotes
15
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A survey of the relative incidence of anastomosis groups (AGs) of Rhizoctonia spp. associated with potato disease was conducted in Idaho, the leading potato producing state in the U.S.A. In total, 169 isolates of Rhizoctonia solani and seven binucleate Rhizoctonia (BNR) isolates were recovered from diseased potato plants. The AG of each isolate was determined through real-time PCR assays for AG 3-PT and phylogenetic analysis of the internal transcribed spacer region of ribosomal DNA. AG 3-PT was the predominant AG, accounting for 85% of isolates recovered, followed by AG 2-1 (5.7%) and AG 4 HG-II (4.5%). Two different subsets of AG 2-1 isolates were recovered (subset 2 and 3). Three isolates each of AG A and AG K were recovered, as well as one isolate each of AG 5 and AG W. An experiment carried out under greenhouse conditions with representative isolates of the different AGs recovered from Idaho potatoes showed differences in aggressiveness between AGs to potato stems, with AG 3-PT being the most aggressive followed by an isolate of AG 2-1 (subset 3). The three BNR isolates representative of AG A, AG K, and AG W appeared to be less aggressive to potato stems than the R. solani isolates except for the AG 2-1 (subset 2) isolate. This is the first comprehensive study of the relative incidences of Rhizoctonia species associated with Idaho potatoes and the first study to report the presence of BNR AG W outside of China.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

169 R. solani isolates were recovered from diseased potato.

Interactor
Rhizoctonia solaniRhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
Outcome
Rhizoctonia solanie0
Value
169 isolatese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“169 isolates of Rhizoctonia solani and seven binucleate Rhizoctonia (BNR) isolates were recovered from diseased potato plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 197–323 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seven binucleate Rhizoctonia isolates were recovered from diseased potato.

Interactor
binucleate Rhizoctoniae0pathogen
Outcome
binucleate Rhizoctonia (BNR) isolatese0
Value
seven binucleate Rhizoctonia (BNR) isolatese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seven binucleate Rhizoctonia (BNR) isolates were recovered from diseased potato plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 236–323 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AG 3-PT accounted for 85% of recovered isolates.

Outcome
AG 3-PTe0
Value
85%e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“AG 3-PT was the predominant AG, accounting for 85% of isolates recovered”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 489–561 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two AG 2-1 subsets were recovered.

Outcome
subsets of AG 2-1 isolatese0
Value
Two different subsetse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Two different subsets of AG 2-1 isolates were recovered (subset 2 and 3).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 612–685 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AG 3-PT was most aggressive to potato stems.

Interactor
AG 3-PTe0pathogen
Outcome
most aggressivee0
Direction
most aggressivee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“AG 3-PT being the most aggressive followed by an isolate of AG 2-1 (subset 3).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 990–1068 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

An AG 2-1 subset 3 isolate ranked second in aggressiveness.

Interactor
AG 2-1e0pathogen
Outcome
AG 2-1 (subset 3)e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“followed by an isolate of AG 2-1 (subset 3).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1068 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three BNR groups were less aggressive than most R. solani isolates.

Interactor
BNR isolatese0pathogen
Outcome
aggressive to potato stemse0
Direction
less aggressivee0
Comparator
R. solani isolatese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The three BNR isolates representative of AG A, AG K, and AG W appeared to be less aggressive to potato stems than the R. solani isolates except for the AG 2-1 (subset 2) isolate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1069–1247 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BNR AG W was reported outside China.

Interactor
BNR AG We0pathogen
Outcome
presence of BNR AG We0
Setting
Chinae0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the first study to report the presence of BNR AG W outside of China.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1371–1439 · show in text ↑