Abstract
Abstract All acaricide treatments and the water control were applied in a manner to duplicate the alternate-row application technique employed by many commercial growers. A Swanson airblast sprayer, calibrated to deliver 25 gal/acre (94.64 liter/ha) at 100 psi (7.03 kg/cm2) at a ground speed of 2 mph (3.22 km/hr) when spraying one side of the row, was used to apply all materials on each spray date. Each plot consisted of a single row of 35 trees of 8-yr-old Red Del icious. Samples for the Plictran standard included in the tables were taken from similar adjacent trees in the remainder of the 4-acre block. Four subsamples of 25 leaves collected from each of 4 trees, spaced evenly along the treatment row were collected in plastic bags, placed in an ice chest, and taken to the laboratory where they were brushed following the Henderson-McBurnie method. Counts of European red mites, European red mite eggs, and Apple rust mites were recorded. Two applicationsweremade, the first on Jul 16 to the south side ofthe row and the second on Jul 28 to the north side. Countswere madeon Jul 15, 18, 25, 28, and 29. Data are presented as percent change between the two counting dates indicated in each table. The average number of mites or mite eggs is also included to give relevance to the percentages. No phytotoxic effects were noted.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 1
Claim · model-written summary
No phytotoxic effects were noted on apple from the acaricide treatments or the water control.
- Taxon
- Apple
Malus domesticat0 - Treatment
- acaricide treatmentse2
- Outcome
- phytotoxic effectse1
- Comparator
- water controle2
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Apple”
e1“No phytotoxic effects were noted”
e2“All acaricide treatments and the water control”
The same questions in other papers
insecticide · crop injury · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.