Paper · 2001 · Biotropica

Hurricane Impacts on a Mangrove Forest in the Dominican Republic: Damage Patterns and Early Recovery1

Ruth E. Sherman; Timothy J. Fahey; Pedro Martinez

16
claims
29
verbatim quotes
98
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT On 22 September 1998, Hurricane Georges passed over the Dominican Republic causing extensive damage to a 4700 ha mangrove forest that has been the site of a detailed study of vegetation and ecosystem dynamics since 1994. We resurveyed the vegetation in permanent plots at 7 and 18 months after the hurricane to document structural damage of the forest and evaluate early recovery patterns. The intensity of damage was patchy across the landscape. Mortality (>5 cm DBH) ranged from 14 to 100 percent (by density) among the 23 different plots and averaged 47.7 percent across all plots. Reductions in total basal area ranged from 9 to 100 percent, averaging 42.4 percent. Mortality increased by 9 percent between surveys at 7 and 18 months post‐hurricane. Interspecific differences in susceptibility to wind damage appeared to be a primary factor contributing to spatial patterns in mortality. Laguncularia racemosa experienced much less mortality (26%) than either Rhizophora mangle (50%) or Avicennia germinans (64%), and plot‐level mortality was strongly associated with differences in species composition. There were no clear relationships between canopy height and tree damage at this site. Over 80 percent of the of the surviving R. mangle trees exhibited less than 50 percent crown damage, whereas ca 60 percent of the L. racemosa survivors suffered almost complete (75–100%) crown loss. By 18 months after the hurricane, the percentage of L. racemosa trees in the 75 to 100 percent damage class was reduced to 20 percent; in contrast, the health of many R . mangle individuals appeared to be declining, as the percentage of trees in the 50 to 100 percent damage class increased from 16 to 36 percent. Understory light levels, as measured by the gap light index, increased from an average value of 3 percent in the pre‐hurricane forest to 51 percent at 7 months after the hurricane and decreased slightly to 47 percent at 18 months. Few saplings (>1 m tall and <5 cm DBH) survived the hurricane; 72 percent of the tagged individuals in transect‐based plots and 66 percent of saplings in pre‐hurricane canopy gaps were killed. Seedling and sapling populations of all three species appear to be recovering rapidly although their densities still are lower than in the pre‐hurricane forest. It is too early to predict the trajectory of forest recovery, and continued monitoring of the spatial and temporal patterns of forest development is needed to improve our understanding of the role that large‐scale disturbance events play on the dynamics of mangrove forest ecosystems. RESUMES El 22 de septiembre de 1998, el huracán Georges pasó sobre la República Dominicana causando daños extensos a 47 km2 de manglar que ha sido objeto un estudio detallado de vegetacion y dinámica de la communidad desde 1994. Se tomarón muestras de la vegetación en parcelas permanentes 7 y 18 meses después de paso del huracán para documentar los daños estructurales del bosque y evaluar los modelos de recuperacion temprana que siguieron posteriormente. La intensidad del daño fue irregular a través del paisaje. La mortalidad (>5 cm de dap) fue de 14 a 100 por ciento (para la densidad) en las 23 parcelas con un promedio de 47.7 por ciento. La reducción en área basal total fue de 9 a 100 por ciento con un promedio de 42.4 por ciento. La mortalidad aumentó 9 por ciento a los 7 y 18 meses después del huracán. Las diferencias interspecificas en la susceptibilidad a los daños causados por el viento fueron un factor contribuyente importante en los patrones espacios de mortalidad. Laguncularia racemosa sufrió menor mortalidad (26%) que Rhizophora mangle (50%) o Avicennia germinans (64%), la mortalidad en las parcelas estuvo asociada fuertemente con la diferencia en composición de especies. No hubo ningún patron definido entre la altura del dosel y el daño del árbol. Más del 80 por ciento de los árboles sobrevivientes de R. mangle exhibieron daoñres menores de 50 por ciento en sus copas, mientras que ca 60 por ciento de los L. racemosa sobrevivientes sufrió una perdida casi total (75‐100%). Dieciocho meses despues del huracan, el porcentaje de arboles de L. racemosa con daños del 75‐100 por ciento se redujó a 20 por ciento; en contraste, la salud de muchos individuos de R. mangle disminuyó conforme el porcentaje de árboles con daños del 50‐100 por ciento aumentó de 16 a 36 por ciento. Los niveles de penetración de luz en el sotobosque, medidos como el indice de iluminacion en los claros, aumentó de un promedio de 3 por ciento antes del huracán. a 51 por ciento 7 meses después del huracán, y disminuyo ligeramente a 47 por

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mortality of trees (>5 cm DBH) averaged 47.7 percent across plots after Hurricane Georges, ranging from 14 to 100 percent among plots.

Taxon
mangrove forestt0
Treatment
Hurricane Georgese0
Outcome
Mortalitye1
Value
47.7 percente1
Qualifier
ranged from 14 to 100 percente1
Setting
Dominican Republict0

Verbatim

e0

“Hurricane Georges passed over the Dominican Republic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 31–83 · show in text ↑
e1

“Mortality (>5 cm DBH) ranged from 14 to 100 percent (by density) among the 23 different plots and averaged 47.7 percent across all plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 456–592 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mangrove Forest in the Dominican Republic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Laguncularia racemosa had much lower mortality (26%) than Rhizophora mangle (50%) or Avicennia germinans (64%).

Taxon
Laguncularia racemosaLaguncularia racemosae1
Outcome
mortalitye1
Direction
lesse1
Value
26%e1
Qualifier
Avicennia germinans (64%)e1
Comparator
Rhizophora manglee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Laguncularia racemosa
Laguncularia racemosa · TaxonUlf Mehlig · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Laguncularia racemosa experienced much less mortality (26%) than either Rhizophora mangle (50%) or Avicennia germinans (64%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–1025 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plot-level mortality was strongly associated with differences in species composition.

Taxon
mangrove forestt0
Treatment
differences in species compositione1
Outcome
mortalitye1

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e1

“plot‐level mortality was strongly associated with differences in species composition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1031–1115 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mangrove Forest in the Dominican Republic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–64 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No clear relationship was found between canopy height and tree damage.

Taxon
mangrove forestt0
Treatment
canopy heighte1
Outcome
tree damagee1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1

Verbatim

e1

“There were no clear relationships between canopy height and tree damage at this site”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1117–1201 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mangrove Forest in the Dominican Republic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Over 80 percent of surviving R. mangle trees had less than 50 percent crown damage.

Taxon
R. mangleRhizophora manglee1
Outcome
crown damagee1
Value
Over 80 percente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rhizophora mangle
Rhizophora mangle · TaxonJames St. John · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Over 80 percent of the of the surviving R. mangle trees exhibited less than 50 percent crown damage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1203–1302 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

About 60 percent of surviving L. racemosa trees suffered almost complete crown loss.

Taxon
L. racemosaLaguncularia racemosae1
Outcome
crown losse1
Value
ca 60 percente1
Qualifier
almost complete (75–100%)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Laguncularia racemosa
Laguncularia racemosa · TaxonUlf Mehlig · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“ca 60 percent of the L. racemosa survivors suffered almost complete (75–100%) crown loss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1312–1400 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The share of L. racemosa trees in the 75 to 100 percent damage class was reduced to 20 percent by 18 months after the hurricane.

Taxon
L. racemosaLaguncularia racemosae1
Outcome
percentage of L. racemosa trees in the 75 to 100 percent damage classe1
Direction
reducede1
Value
20 percente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Laguncularia racemosa
Laguncularia racemosa · TaxonUlf Mehlig · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the percentage of L. racemosa trees in the 75 to 100 percent damage class was reduced to 20 percent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1436–1535 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The health of many R. mangle trees appeared to decline, as the share of trees in the 50 to 100 percent damage class increased from 16 to 36 percent.

Taxon
R . mangleRhizophora manglee1
Outcome
percentage of trees in the 50 to 100 percent damage classe1
Direction
increasede1
Value
16 to 36 percente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rhizophora mangle
Rhizophora mangle · TaxonJames St. John · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the health of many R . mangle individuals appeared to be declining, as the percentage of trees in the 50 to 100 percent damage class increased from 16 to 36 percent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1550–1714 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Understory light level increased from an average of 3 percent before the hurricane to 51 percent at 7 months after it.

Taxon
mangrove forestt0
Outcome
Understory light levelse1
Direction
increasede1
Value
51 percente2

Verbatim

e1

“Understory light levels, as measured by the gap light index, increased from an average value of 3 percent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1716–1821 · show in text ↑
e2

“to 51 percent at 7 months after the hurricane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1850–1895 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mangrove Forest in the Dominican Republic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Of the tagged saplings in transect-based plots, 72 percent were killed by the hurricane.

Taxon
mangrove forestt0
Outcome
killede1
Value
72 percente1

Verbatim

e1

“Few saplings (>1 m tall and <5 cm DBH) survived the hurricane; 72 percent of the tagged individuals in transect‐based plots and 66 percent of saplings in pre‐hurricane canopy gaps were killed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1947–2138 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mangrove Forest in the Dominican Republic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Of saplings in pre-hurricane canopy gaps, 66 percent were killed by the hurricane.

Taxon
mangrove forestt0
Outcome
killede1
Value
66 percente1

Verbatim

e1

“Few saplings (>1 m tall and <5 cm DBH) survived the hurricane; 72 percent of the tagged individuals in transect‐based plots and 66 percent of saplings in pre‐hurricane canopy gaps were killed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1947–2138 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mangrove Forest in the Dominican Republic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mortality increased by 9 percent between surveys at 7 and 18 months after the hurricane.

Taxon
mangrove forestt0
Outcome
Mortalitye1
Direction
increasede1
Value
9 percente1

Verbatim

e1

“Mortality increased by 9 percent between surveys at 7 and 18 months”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–746 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mangrove Forest in the Dominican Republic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total basal area was reduced by 42.4 percent on average, ranging from 9 to 100 percent among plots.

Taxon
mangrove forestt0
Outcome
total basal areae1
Value
42.4 percente1
Qualifier
ranged from 9 to 100 percente1

Verbatim

e1

“Reductions in total basal area ranged from 9 to 100 percent, averaging 42.4 percent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–677 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mangrove Forest in the Dominican Republic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–64 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seedling and sapling populations of all three species appear to be recovering rapidly.

Taxon
mangrove forestt0
Material
all three speciese1
Outcome
recovering rapidlye1

Verbatim

e1

“Seedling and sapling populations of all three species appear to be recovering rapidly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2140–2225 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mangrove Forest in the Dominican Republic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seedling and sapling densities were still lower than before the hurricane.

Taxon
mangrove forestt0
Outcome
densitiese1
Direction
lowere1

Verbatim

e1

“although their densities still are lower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2226–2266 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mangrove Forest in the Dominican Republic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–64 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Interspecific differences in susceptibility to wind damage appear to be a primary factor behind spatial patterns in mortality.

Taxon
mangrove forestt0
Outcome
spatial patterns in mortalitye1
Qualifier
Interspecific differences in susceptibility to wind damagee1

Verbatim

e1

“Interspecific differences in susceptibility to wind damage appeared to be a primary factor contributing to spatial patterns in mortality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 763–899 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mangrove Forest in the Dominican Republic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–64 · show in text ↑