Abstract
The present research was carried out at Guneid Sugar Cane Research Center during two successive seasons 2013/14 and 2014/15. The objective was to investigate the effect of four tillage systems (moldboard ploughing (T1), disc ploughing (T2), chisel ploughing (T3) and disc harrowing (T4)), three irrigation intervals (7, 10, and 14 days) and twoplanting methods (manual and mechanical) on sugar beet production. The parameters measured were machinery performance as effective field capacity (EFC), field efficiency (FE) and Fuel consumption (FC), some soil parameters (soil moisture content and bulk density), some crop parameters (root thickness (RT), crop root yield (RY), polarization or sugar content (Pol %), total sugar production (TSP) and cost of production. A spilt -split plot design with four replications was used inthis study. The results showed that all machine performance parameters measured were significantly different and the highest EFC, FE and FC were recorded by the planter, ridger and chisel machines respectively.Tillage treatments and irrigation intervals interaction insignificantly affected soil moisture content and significantly (P≤0.01) affected soil bulk density. The highest values of RT (38.6 cm), RY (31.9 t/fed), Pol % (19.9%) and TSP (4.9 t/fed) was recorded by (T3×M2×I1), (T2×M1×I2), (T4×M2×I3) and (T2×M1×I1) treatments respectively. The highest (4280 SDG/fed) and lowest (3290 SDG/fed) total cost of production was recorded by (T1×M1×I1) and (T4×M2×I4) treatments respectively. It can be concluded that generally disc ploughing with 10 days irrigation intervaland manual planting can give higher crop root yield, higher TSP and lower cost of production at Guneid Sugar Cane Research Center
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 12
Claim · model-written summary
The planter had the highest effective field capacity (EFC) among the machines.
- Taxon
- Sugar Beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0 - Treatment
- plantere0
- Outcome
- EFCe0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris) Production as Affected by Tillage Systems, Planting Methods and Irrigation Intervals in Guneid area (Sudan)”
e0“The results showed that all machine performance parameters measured were significantly different and the highest EFC, FE and FC were recorded by the planter, ridger and chisel machines respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
The ridger had the highest field efficiency (FE) among the machines.
- Taxon
- Sugar BeetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- ridgere0
- Outcome
- FEe0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris) Production as Affected by Tillage Systems, Planting Methods and Irrigation Intervals in Guneid area (Sudan)”
e0“The results showed that all machine performance parameters measured were significantly different and the highest EFC, FE and FC were recorded by the planter, ridger and chisel machines respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
The chisel machines had the highest fuel consumption (FC) among the machines.
- Taxon
- Sugar BeetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- chisel machinese0
- Outcome
- FCe0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris) Production as Affected by Tillage Systems, Planting Methods and Irrigation Intervals in Guneid area (Sudan)”
e0“The results showed that all machine performance parameters measured were significantly different and the highest EFC, FE and FC were recorded by the planter, ridger and chisel machines respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
The interaction of tillage treatments and irrigation intervals did not significantly affect soil moisture content.
- Taxon
- Sugar BeetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- Tillage treatments and irrigation intervals interactione1
- Outcome
- soil moisture contente1
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris) Production as Affected by Tillage Systems, Planting Methods and Irrigation Intervals in Guneid area (Sudan)”
e1“Tillage treatments and irrigation intervals interaction insignificantly affected soil moisture content and significantly (P≤0.01) affected soil bulk density”
Claim · model-written summary
The interaction of tillage treatments and irrigation intervals significantly affected soil bulk density (P≤0.01).
- Taxon
- Sugar BeetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- Tillage treatments and irrigation intervals interactione1
- Outcome
- soil bulk densitye1
- Qualifier
- P≤0.01e1
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris) Production as Affected by Tillage Systems, Planting Methods and Irrigation Intervals in Guneid area (Sudan)”
e1“Tillage treatments and irrigation intervals interaction insignificantly affected soil moisture content and significantly (P≤0.01) affected soil bulk density”
Claim · model-written summary
The highest sugar beet root thickness (38.6 cm) was recorded under treatment T3×M2×I1.
- Taxon
- Sugar BeetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- T3×M2×I1e2
- Outcome
- RTe2
- Direction
- higheste2
- Value
- 38.6 cme2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris) Production as Affected by Tillage Systems, Planting Methods and Irrigation Intervals in Guneid area (Sudan)”
e2“The highest values of RT (38.6 cm), RY (31.9 t/fed), Pol % (19.9%) and TSP (4.9 t/fed) was recorded by (T3×M2×I1), (T2×M1×I2), (T4×M2×I3) and (T2×M1×I1) treatments respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
The highest sugar beet crop root yield (31.9 t/fed) was recorded under treatment T2×M1×I2.
- Taxon
- Sugar BeetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- T2×M1×I2e2
- Outcome
- RYe2
- Direction
- higheste2
- Value
- 31.9 t/fede2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris) Production as Affected by Tillage Systems, Planting Methods and Irrigation Intervals in Guneid area (Sudan)”
e2“The highest values of RT (38.6 cm), RY (31.9 t/fed), Pol % (19.9%) and TSP (4.9 t/fed) was recorded by (T3×M2×I1), (T2×M1×I2), (T4×M2×I3) and (T2×M1×I1) treatments respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
The highest sugar content (Pol %, 19.9%) of sugar beet was recorded under treatment T4×M2×I3.
- Taxon
- Sugar BeetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- T4×M2×I3e2
- Outcome
- Pol %e2
- Direction
- higheste2
- Value
- 19.9%e2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris) Production as Affected by Tillage Systems, Planting Methods and Irrigation Intervals in Guneid area (Sudan)”
e2“The highest values of RT (38.6 cm), RY (31.9 t/fed), Pol % (19.9%) and TSP (4.9 t/fed) was recorded by (T3×M2×I1), (T2×M1×I2), (T4×M2×I3) and (T2×M1×I1) treatments respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
The highest total sugar production (TSP, 4.9 t/fed) of sugar beet was recorded under treatment T2×M1×I1.
- Taxon
- Sugar BeetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- T2×M1×I1e2
- Outcome
- TSPe2
- Direction
- higheste2
- Value
- 4.9 t/fede2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris) Production as Affected by Tillage Systems, Planting Methods and Irrigation Intervals in Guneid area (Sudan)”
e2“The highest values of RT (38.6 cm), RY (31.9 t/fed), Pol % (19.9%) and TSP (4.9 t/fed) was recorded by (T3×M2×I1), (T2×M1×I2), (T4×M2×I3) and (T2×M1×I1) treatments respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
The highest total cost of production (4280 SDG/fed) of sugar beet was recorded under treatment T1×M1×I1.
- Taxon
- Sugar BeetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- T1×M1×I1e3
- Outcome
- total cost of productione3
- Direction
- higheste3
- Value
- 4280 SDG/fede3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris) Production as Affected by Tillage Systems, Planting Methods and Irrigation Intervals in Guneid area (Sudan)”
e3“The highest (4280 SDG/fed) and lowest (3290 SDG/fed) total cost of production was recorded by (T1×M1×I1) and (T4×M2×I4) treatments respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
The lowest total cost of production (3290 SDG/fed) of sugar beet was recorded under treatment T4×M2×I4.
- Taxon
- Sugar BeetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- T4×M2×I4e3
- Outcome
- total cost of productione3
- Direction
- loweste3
- Value
- 3290 SDG/fede3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris) Production as Affected by Tillage Systems, Planting Methods and Irrigation Intervals in Guneid area (Sudan)”
e3“The highest (4280 SDG/fed) and lowest (3290 SDG/fed) total cost of production was recorded by (T1×M1×I1) and (T4×M2×I4) treatments respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend disc ploughing with a 10-day irrigation interval and manual planting for higher root yield, higher TSP and lower production cost of sugar beet at Guneid.
- Taxon
- Sugar BeetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Outcome
- disc ploughing with 10 days irrigation intervaland manual plantinge4
- Setting
- Guneid Sugar Cane Research Centere4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris) Production as Affected by Tillage Systems, Planting Methods and Irrigation Intervals in Guneid area (Sudan)”
e4“It can be concluded that generally disc ploughing with 10 days irrigation intervaland manual planting can give higher crop root yield, higher TSP and lower cost of production at Guneid Sugar Cane Research Center”
The same questions in other papers
irrigation · quality: grain · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- positive
tillage · quality: grain · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.