Paper · 1994 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Effects of excess manganese on mineral uptake in mycorrhizal sorghum

C. A. B. Medeiros; R. B. Clark; J. R. Ellis

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Associations between vesicular‐arbuscular mycorrhizal (VAM) fungi and manganese (Mn) nutrition/toxicity are not clear. This study was conducted to determine the effects of excess levels of Mn on mineral nutrient uptake in shoots and roots of mycorrhizal (+VAM) and non‐mycorrhizal (‐VAM) sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L) Moench, cv. NB9040]. Plants colonized with and without two VAM isolates [Glomus intraradices UT143–2 (UT1 43) and Gl. etunicatum UT316A‐2 (UT316)] were grown in sand irrigated with nutrient solution at pH 4.8 containing 0, 270, 540, and 1080 μM of added Mn (as manganese chloride) above the basal solution (18 μM). Shoot and root dry matter followed the sequence of UT316 > UT143 > ‐VAM, and shoots had greater differences than roots. Shoot and root concentrations and contents of Mn, phosphorus (P), sulfur (S), potassium (K), calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg), iron (Fe), zinc (Zn), and copper (Cu were determined. The +VAM plants generally had higher mineral nutrient concentrations and contents than ‐VAM plants, although ‐VAM plants had higher concentrations and contents of some minerals than +VAM plants at some Mn levels. Plants colonized with UT143 had higher concentrations of shoot P, Ca, Zn, and Cu and higher root Mg, Zn, and Cu than UT316 colonized plants, while UT316 colonized plants had higher shoot and root K concentrations than UT143 colonized plants. These results showed that VAM isolates differ in enhancement of mineral nutrient uptake by sorghum.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot and root dry matter ranked UT316 above UT143 above nonmycorrhizal plants.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
UT316e0
Interactor
UT316e0symbiont
Outcome
Shoot and root dry mattere0
Direction
UT316 > UT143 > ‐VAMe0
Comparator
‐VAMe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shoot and root dry matter followed the sequence of UT316 > UT143 > ‐VAM, and shoots had greater differences than roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 641–759 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–68 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot dry matter differences exceeded root differences.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Outcome
shootse0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
rootse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shoots had greater differences than roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–759 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal plants generally had higher mineral nutrient concentrations and contents than nonmycorrhizal plants.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
+VAMe0
Interactor
VAMe0symbiont
Outcome
mineral nutrient concentrations and contentse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
‐VAMe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The +VAM plants generally had higher mineral nutrient concentrations and contents than ‐VAM plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–1036 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–68 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nonmycorrhizal plants had higher levels of some minerals at some manganese levels.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Outcome
concentrations and contents of some mineralse0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
at some Mn levelse0
Comparator
+VAM plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“‐VAM plants had higher concentrations and contents of some minerals than +VAM plants at some Mn levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1149 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UT143 plants had higher shoot phosphorus, calcium and zinc concentrations than UT316 plants.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
UT143e0
Interactor
UT143e0symbiont
Outcome
shoot P, Ca, Zn, and Cue0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
UT316e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants colonized with UT143 had higher concentrations of shoot P, Ca, Zn, and Cu and higher root Mg, Zn, and Cu than UT316 colonized plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1151–1290 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UT143 plants had higher root magnesium, zinc and copper than UT316 plants.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
UT143e0
Interactor
UT143e0symbiont
Outcome
root Mg, Zn, and Cue0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
UT316e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants colonized with UT143 had higher concentrations of shoot P, Ca, Zn, and Cu and higher root Mg, Zn, and Cu than UT316 colonized plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1151–1290 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UT316 plants had higher shoot and root potassium concentrations than UT143 plants.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
UT316e0
Interactor
UT316e0symbiont
Outcome
shoot and root K concentrationse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
UT143e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“UT316 colonized plants had higher shoot and root K concentrations than UT143 colonized plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1298–1391 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–68 · show in text ↑

mycorrhiza · nutrient: content · SorghumPositive and negative results

22 papers: 21 positive, 1 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.