Paper · 2004 · Agronomy Journal

Tillage and Rotation Interactions for Corn and Soybean Grain Yield as Affected by Precipitation and Air Temperature

W. W. Wilhelm; Charles S. Wortmann

15
claims
17
verbatim quotes
60
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Reduced tillage, including no-till, and crop rotation are common practices for corn (Zea mays L.) and soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] production in the Midwest. Benefits of no-till vary with latitude and cropping system. This study was conducted to evaluate the influence of seasonal temperature and precipitation on the effects of primary tillage (plow, disk, chisel, subsoil, ridge-till, and no-till) and rotated and continuous corn and soybean production under rainfed conditions over 16 yr in southeastern Nebraska. Corn and soybean produced less grain with greater summer temperatures. Corn yield increased with less spring and more summer rainfall. Tillage and rotation practices affected corn grain yield; but only rotation affected soybean yield. Corn produced less grain with no-till than with plow. The tillage × year interaction was significant for both crops; the yield advantage for plow was less during seasons with warmer springs. Soybean grain yield was less responsive to favorable environments with the chisel than other tillage treatments. Grain yield was greater with rotation than continuous cropping for both corn (7.10 vs. 5.83 Mg ha−1) and soybean (2.57 vs. 2.35 Mg ha−1). The benefit of rotation in terms of grain yield was greatest for corn during years with cool springs. The benefit of rotation for soybean grain yield did not vary with weather conditions. Seasonal temperature and rainfall patterns influenced the effects of tillage and rotation on corn yield. In contrast, for soybean, only the pattern of temperature influenced the effect of tillage on yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn produced less grain under greater summer temperatures.

Treatment
greater summer temperaturese0
Outcome
graine0
Direction
lesse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Corn and soybean produced less grain with greater summer temperatures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–590 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean produced less grain under greater summer temperatures.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
greater summer temperaturese0
Outcome
graine0
Direction
lesse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Corn and soybean produced less grain with greater summer temperatures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–590 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn yield increased with less spring and more summer rainfall.

Treatment
less spring and more summer rainfalle1
Outcome
Corn yielde1
Direction
increasede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Corn yield increased with less spring and more summer rainfall”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–654 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tillage and rotation practices affected corn grain yield.

Treatment
Tillage and rotation practicese2
Outcome
corn grain yielde2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Tillage and rotation practices affected corn grain yield; but only rotation affected soybean yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–754 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Only rotation affected soybean yield.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe2
Treatment
rotatione2
Outcome
soybean yielde2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Tillage and rotation practices affected corn grain yield; but only rotation affected soybean yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–754 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn produced less grain with no-till than with plow.

Treatment
no-tille3
Outcome
graine3
Direction
lesse3
Comparator
plowe3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Corn produced less grain with no-till than with plow”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–808 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The yield advantage for plow was smaller in seasons with warmer springs.

Treatment
plowe4
Outcome
yield advantage for plowe4
Direction
lesse4
Qualifier
during seasons with warmer springse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Corn and soybean produced less grain with greater summer temperatures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–590 · show in text ↑
e4

“the yield advantage for plow was less during seasons with warmer springs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 873–945 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The tillage by year interaction was significant for both crops.

Treatment
tillage × year interactione1
Outcome
graine0
Qualifier
significant for both cropse1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Corn and soybean produced less grain with greater summer temperatures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–590 · show in text ↑
e1

“The tillage × year interaction was significant for both crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–871 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seasonal temperature and rainfall patterns influenced the effects of tillage and rotation on corn yield.

Treatment
tillage and rotatione0
Outcome
corn yielde0
Qualifier
Seasonal temperature and rainfall patternse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seasonal temperature and rainfall patterns influenced the effects of tillage and rotation on corn yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1386–1489 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

For soybean, only the temperature pattern influenced the effect of tillage on yield.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
tillagee0
Outcome
yielde0
Qualifier
only the pattern of temperaturee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for soybean, only the pattern of temperature influenced the effect of tillage on yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1504–1590 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean grain yield was less responsive to favorable environments with chisel tillage than with other tillage treatments.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxe5
Treatment
chisele5
Outcome
grain yielde5
Direction
less responsivee5
Comparator
other tillage treatmentse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Soybean grain yield was less responsive to favorable environments with the chisel than other tillage treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 947–1058 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn grain yield was greater with rotation than with continuous cropping (7.10 vs 5.83 Mg ha-1).

Treatment
rotatione6
Outcome
Grain yielde6
Direction
greatere6
Value
7.10 vs. 5.83 Mg ha−1e6
Comparator
continuous croppinge6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Grain yield was greater with rotation than continuous cropping for both corn (7.10 vs. 5.83 Mg ha−1) and soybean (2.57 vs. 2.35 Mg ha−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1196 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean grain yield was greater with rotation than with continuous cropping (2.57 vs 2.35 Mg ha-1).

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe6
Treatment
rotatione6
Outcome
Grain yielde6
Direction
greatere6
Value
2.57 vs. 2.35 Mg ha−1e6
Comparator
continuous croppinge6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Grain yield was greater with rotation than continuous cropping for both corn (7.10 vs. 5.83 Mg ha−1) and soybean (2.57 vs. 2.35 Mg ha−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1196 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The benefit of rotation for corn grain yield was greatest during years with cool springs.

Treatment
rotatione7
Outcome
grain yielde7
Direction
greateste7
Qualifier
during years with cool springse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“The benefit of rotation in terms of grain yield was greatest for corn during years with cool springs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1198–1298 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The benefit of rotation for soybean grain yield did not vary with weather conditions.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
rotatione0
Outcome
soybean grain yielde0
Direction
no_changeinferrede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The benefit of rotation for soybean grain yield did not vary with weather conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1300–1384 · show in text ↑

rotation · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

144 papers: 107 positive, 37 negative or no effect

106 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. negative

140 papers more in this group

See all 144 papers →

rotation · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

322 papers: 254 positive, 68 negative or no effect

253 papers in the same direction as this paper · 52 in the opposite direction · 16 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

318 papers more in this group

See all 322 papers →

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

286 papers in the same direction as this paper · 812 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.