Paper · 1994 · Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

Tillage effects on selected chemical properties of grantsburg silt loam

B. K. Kitur; S. R. Phillips; K. R. Olson; et al.

15
claims
32
verbatim quotes
14
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The objective of this research was to determine the effects of tillage systems on selected chemical properties of a sloping and eroded soil which had previously been in sod. A tillage project was initiated in the spring, 1989 in southern Illinois on a soil with a root‐restricting fragipan. Corn (Zea mays L.) and soybean [Glycine max (L.) Mem] were grown on the plot area on a yearly rotation system. Prior to the application of lime or tillage treatments the 0–15 cm Ap horizon had a pH of 6.3, organic carbon (C) of 1.4 g/100g, and CEC equal to 17 meq/100g. Lime had been surface applied early in the spring of 1989 prior to moldboard (MP) and chisel (CP) plowing. Moldboard plowing had lower pH than the other treatments in the 0–5 cm layer in 1989 due to the moldboard plow mixing low pH subsoil material into the 0–5 cm layer and mixing surface applied lime into the 5–15 cm layer. During the 4th year, organic C was lowest for MP (1.28 g/100g) and highest for no tillage (NT) (1.65 g/100g), with CP having organic C content of 1.52 g/100g in the 0–5 cm layer. The differences in organic C were attributed to the effects of incorporation of plant residues below the 0–5 cm layer in the moldboard and chisel plow treatments. Effects of tillage on organic C content were not significant in the 5–15 cm layer. Soil phosphorus (P) (Bray Pl) and extractable potassium (K) were stratified, with the largest amounts of these two elements found within the top 5 cm of soil. In general, tillage did not have any significant (P=0.05) effect on either extractable calcium (Ca) or magnesium (Mg). Differences were observed in exchangeable ammonium‐nitrogen (NH4+‐N) and nitrate‐nitrogen (NO3 ‐‐N) by tillage treatments and were affected by soil moisture content and previous crop residues. Cation exchange capacity (CEC) was lower for MP at the 0–5 cm layer as compared to NT and CP in the 3rd year. At the 5–15 cm layer CEC was lower for NT as compared to CP and MP. The differences in CEC were attributed to the observed differences in organic C and possibly the effects of moldboard and chisel plow mixing subsoil materials slightly higher in clay content into the Ap horizon. In 1989, corn grain yield for NT was significantly lower than MP and CP. In 1990, 1991 and 1992 the crop yields by tillage treatment were not significantly different. Any conversion of conservation reserve land from sod into NT corn and soybean production could experience similar management problems and corn yield reductions the first year. The initial yield advantage MP system had the 1st year did not occur the last three years. Based on four years of observation, no‐till and chisel plow systems may better maintain long‐term productivity of sloping soils than moldboard plow systems because of changes in distribution and availability of nutrients and organic C in the 0–5 cm layer, reduced soil erosion, and yield trends.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moldboard plowing gave lower soil pH than the other tillage treatments.

Taxon
Zea maysZea mayse1
Treatment
Moldboard plowinge2
Outcome
pHe2
Direction
lowere2
Comparator
the other treatmentse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Corn (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 300–318 · show in text ↑
e2

“Moldboard plowing had lower pH than the other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–733 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic C was lowest under moldboard plowing (MP), at 1.28 g/100g, in the 4th year.

Taxon
Zea maysZea mayse1
Treatment
MPe2
Outcome
organic Ce2
Direction
loweste2
Value
1.28 g/100ge2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Corn (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 300–318 · show in text ↑
e2

“organic C was lowest for MP (1.28 g/100g) and highest for no tillage (NT) (1.65 g/100g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–1005 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic C was highest under no tillage (NT), at 1.65 g/100g, in the 4th year.

Taxon
Zea maysZea mayse1
Treatment
no tillage (NT)e2
Outcome
organic Ce2
Direction
higheste2
Value
1.65 g/100ge2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Corn (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 300–318 · show in text ↑
e2

“organic C was lowest for MP (1.28 g/100g) and highest for no tillage (NT) (1.65 g/100g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–1005 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic C content was 1.52 g/100g under chisel plowing (CP) in the 0-5 cm layer.

Taxon
Zea maysZea mayse1
Treatment
CPe2
Outcome
organic C contente2
Value
1.52 g/100ge2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Corn (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 300–318 · show in text ↑
e2

“with CP having organic C content of 1.52 g/100g”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1054 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tillage had no significant effect on organic C content in the 5-15 cm layer.

Taxon
Zea maysZea mayse1
Treatment
tillagee2
Outcome
organic C contente2
Qualifier
5–15 cm layere2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Corn (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 300–318 · show in text ↑
e2

“Effects of tillage on organic C content were not significant in the 5–15 cm layer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1239–1320 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil P and extractable K were stratified, with the largest amounts within the top 5 cm of soil.

Taxon
Zea maysZea mayse1
Outcome
Soil phosphorus (P) (Bray Pl) and extractable potassium (K)e2
Qualifier
the largest amounts of these two elements found within the top 5 cm of soile2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Corn (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 300–318 · show in text ↑
e2

“Soil phosphorus (P) (Bray Pl) and extractable potassium (K) were stratified, with the largest amounts of these two elements found within the top 5 cm of soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1322–1479 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tillage did not significantly affect exchangeable calcium or magnesium.

Taxon
Zea maysZea mayse1
Treatment
tillagee2
Outcome
extractable calcium (Ca) or magnesium (Mg)e2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Corn (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 300–318 · show in text ↑
e2

“In general, tillage did not have any significant (P=0.05) effect on either extractable calcium (Ca) or magnesium (Mg)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1481–1598 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Exchangeable ammonium differed among tillage treatments and was affected by soil moisture content and previous crop residues.

Taxon
Zea maysZea mayse1
Treatment
tillage treatmentse3
Outcome
exchangeable ammoniume2
Direction
Differences were observede2
Qualifier
soil moisture content and previous crop residuese3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Corn (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 300–318 · show in text ↑
e2

“Differences were observed in exchangeable ammonium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1600–1650 · show in text ↑
e3

“by tillage treatments and were affected by soil moisture content and previous crop residues”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1700–1791 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cation exchange capacity was lower under MP than under NT and CP at the 0-5 cm layer in the 3rd year.

Taxon
Zea maysZea mayse1
Treatment
MPe2
Outcome
Cation exchange capacity (CEC)e2
Direction
lowere2
Qualifier
in the 3rd yeare3
Comparator
NT and CPe3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Corn (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 300–318 · show in text ↑
e2

“Cation exchange capacity (CEC) was lower for MP at the 0–5 cm layer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1793–1860 · show in text ↑
e3

“as compared to NT and CP in the 3rd year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1861–1901 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cation exchange capacity was lower under NT than under CP and MP at the 5-15 cm layer.

Taxon
Zea maysZea mayse1
Treatment
NTe2
Outcome
CECe2
Direction
lowere2
Qualifier
5–15 cm layere2
Comparator
CP and MPe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Corn (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 300–318 · show in text ↑
e2

“At the 5–15 cm layer CEC was lower for NT as compared to CP and MP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1903–1969 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1989, corn grain yield under NT was significantly lower than under MP and CP.

Taxon
Zea maysZea mayse1
Treatment
NTe2
Outcome
corn grain yielde2
Direction
lowere2
Qualifier
In 1989e2
Comparator
MP and CPe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Corn (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 300–318 · show in text ↑
e2

“In 1989, corn grain yield for NT was significantly lower than MP and CP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2183–2254 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Crop yields in 1990, 1991 and 1992 did not differ significantly among tillage treatments.

Taxon
Zea maysZea mayse1
Treatment
tillage treatmente2
Outcome
crop yieldse2
Qualifier
In 1990, 1991 and 1992e2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Corn (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 300–318 · show in text ↑
e2

“In 1990, 1991 and 1992 the crop yields by tillage treatment were not significantly different”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2256–2348 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The initial yield advantage under MP in the first year did not occur in the last three years.

Taxon
Zea maysZea mayse1
Treatment
MP systeme2
Outcome
initial yield advantagee2
Qualifier
did not occur the last three yearse2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Corn (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 300–318 · show in text ↑
e2

“The initial yield advantage MP system had the 1st year did not occur the last three years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2526–2615 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

No-till and chisel plow systems may better maintain long-term productivity than moldboard systems over the study period.

Taxon
Zea maysZea mayse1
Treatment
chisel plow systemse2
Outcome
productivitye2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Corn (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 300–318 · show in text ↑
e2

“Based on four years of observation, no‐till and chisel plow systems may better maintain long‐term productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2617–2727 · show in text ↑
Recommendationhypothesisoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Converting conservation reserve land to no-till corn could cause yield reductions in the first year.

Taxon
Zea maysZea mayse1
Outcome
corn yield reductions the first yeare2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Corn (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 300–318 · show in text ↑
e2

“Any conversion of conservation reserve land from sod into NT corn and soybean production could experience similar management problems and corn yield reductions the first year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2350–2524 · show in text ↑

tillage · molecular: metabolites · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 25 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

tillage · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

127 papers: 93 positive, 34 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 93 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

123 papers more in this group

See all 127 papers →

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

286 papers in the same direction as this paper · 812 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.