Paper · 2002 · HortScience

Longan Quality after Hot-water Immersion and X-ray Irradiation Quarantine Treatments

Peter A. Follett; Suzanne S. Sanxter

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
16
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Hot-water immersion and irradiation quarantine treatments are used to disinfest longan [ Dimocarpus longan (Lour.) Steud.] of fruit flies and other pests before export from Hawaii to the U.S. mainland. One day after harvest, longan fruit (cvs. Chompoo and Biew Kiew) were subjected to hot-water immersion at 49 °C for 20 minutes, irradiation treatment at a minimum absorbed dose of 400 Gy, or left untreated as controls. Fruit were then stored at 10 °C in perforated plastic bags, and quality attributes were evaluated after 7, 14, and 21 days. `Chompoo' and `Biew Kiew' fruit treated by hot-water immersion were darker (lower L * ) and less intensely colored (lower C * ) than irradiated or untreated fruits after 14 days of posttreatment storage. For both cultivars, external appearance of fruit treated by hot-water immersion was rated as unacceptable after 14 and 21 days of posttreatment storage, whereas irradiated and nontreated fruit were rated as acceptable on all days. Penicillium mold contributed to the unacceptable external appearance ratings after 21 days for fruit that were treated by hot-water immersion. With both cultivars, taste of fruit treated with hot-water immersion was rated as unacceptable after 21 days of storage, whereas irradiated fruit remained acceptable. Overall, under these experimental conditions, irradiation was superior to hot-water immersion as a quarantine treatment based upon the maintenance of fruit quality.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hot-water immersion made longan fruit darker (lower L*) than irradiated or untreated fruit after 14 days of storage.

Material
Chompoo and Biew Kiewe0
Organ / stage
fruite0
Treatment
hot-water immersione0
Outcome
L *e1
Direction
lowere1
Qualifier
after 14 days of posttreatment storagee1
Comparator
irradiated or untreated fruitse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dimocarpus longan
Dimocarpus longan · TaxonBùi Thụy Đào Nguyên · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“longan fruit (cvs. Chompoo and Biew Kiew) were subjected to hot-water immersion at 49 °C for 20 minutes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–328 · show in text ↑
e1

“darker (lower L * ) and less intensely colored (lower C * ) than irradiated or untreated fruits after 14 days of posttreatment storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–747 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hot-water immersion made longan fruit less intensely colored (lower C*) than irradiated or untreated fruit after 14 days of storage.

Material
Chompoo and Biew Kiewe0
Organ / stage
fruite0
Treatment
hot-water immersione0
Outcome
C *e1
Direction
lowere1
Qualifier
after 14 days of posttreatment storagee1
Comparator
irradiated or untreated fruitse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dimocarpus longan
Dimocarpus longan · TaxonBùi Thụy Đào Nguyên · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“longan fruit (cvs. Chompoo and Biew Kiew) were subjected to hot-water immersion at 49 °C for 20 minutes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–328 · show in text ↑
e1

“darker (lower L * ) and less intensely colored (lower C * ) than irradiated or untreated fruits after 14 days of posttreatment storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–747 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

External appearance of hot-water immersed longan fruit was rated unacceptable after 14 and 21 days, while irradiated and nontreated fruit were rated acceptable.

Material
Chompoo and Biew Kiewe0
Organ / stage
fruite0
Treatment
hot-water immersione2
Outcome
external appearancee2
Qualifier
after 14 and 21 days of posttreatment storagee2
Comparator
irradiated and nontreated fruite2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dimocarpus longan
Dimocarpus longan · TaxonBùi Thụy Đào Nguyên · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“longan fruit (cvs. Chompoo and Biew Kiew) were subjected to hot-water immersion at 49 °C for 20 minutes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–328 · show in text ↑
e2

“external appearance of fruit treated by hot-water immersion was rated as unacceptable after 14 and 21 days of posttreatment storage, whereas irradiated and nontreated fruit were rated as acceptable on all days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–978 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irradiated and nontreated longan fruit were rated acceptable in external appearance on all days.

Material
Chompoo and Biew Kiewe0
Organ / stage
fruite0
Treatment
irradiatede2
Outcome
external appearancee2
Qualifier
were rated as acceptable on all dayse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dimocarpus longan
Dimocarpus longan · TaxonBùi Thụy Đào Nguyên · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“longan fruit (cvs. Chompoo and Biew Kiew) were subjected to hot-water immersion at 49 °C for 20 minutes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–328 · show in text ↑
e2

“external appearance of fruit treated by hot-water immersion was rated as unacceptable after 14 and 21 days of posttreatment storage, whereas irradiated and nontreated fruit were rated as acceptable on all days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–978 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hot-water immersed longan fruit were rated unacceptable in taste after 21 days, while irradiated fruit remained acceptable.

Material
Chompoo and Biew Kiewe0
Organ / stage
fruite0
Treatment
hot-water immersione3
Outcome
tastee3
Qualifier
after 21 days of storagee3
Comparator
irradiated fruite3

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dimocarpus longan
Dimocarpus longan · TaxonBùi Thụy Đào Nguyên · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“longan fruit (cvs. Chompoo and Biew Kiew) were subjected to hot-water immersion at 49 °C for 20 minutes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–328 · show in text ↑
e3

“taste of fruit treated with hot-water immersion was rated as unacceptable after 21 days of storage, whereas irradiated fruit remained acceptable”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1144–1288 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irradiation was superior to hot-water immersion as a quarantine treatment for maintaining longan fruit quality.

Material
Chompoo and Biew Kiewe0
Organ / stage
fruite0
Treatment
irradiatione4
Outcome
fruit qualitye4
Direction
superiore4
Comparator
hot-water immersione4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dimocarpus longan
Dimocarpus longan · TaxonBùi Thụy Đào Nguyên · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“longan fruit (cvs. Chompoo and Biew Kiew) were subjected to hot-water immersion at 49 °C for 20 minutes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–328 · show in text ↑
e4

“irradiation was superior to hot-water immersion as a quarantine treatment based upon the maintenance of fruit quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1336–1453 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Penicillium mold contributed to the unacceptable external appearance ratings of hot-water immersed longan fruit after 21 days.

Interactor
PenicilliumPenicilliume5pathogen
Outcome
external appearance ratingse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dimocarpus longan
Dimocarpus longan · TaxonBùi Thụy Đào Nguyên · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Penicillium
Penicillium · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMilo Manica · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“longan fruit (cvs. Chompoo and Biew Kiew) were subjected to hot-water immersion at 49 °C for 20 minutes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–328 · show in text ↑
e5

“Penicillium mold contributed to the unacceptable external appearance ratings after 21 days for fruit that were treated by hot-water immersion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1121 · show in text ↑

application · quality: general · Dimocarpus longan (longan)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

application · quality: postharvest · Dimocarpus longan (longan)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.