Paper · 2020 · Middle East Journal of Applied Sciences

Yield and Yield Components of Two Maize Hybrids as affected by Water Deficit andArginine

M Nabila; Zaki; Nabila Zaki; et al.

12
claims
20
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Two field experiments were carried out at private farm Wadi El-Rayyan, El-Fayoum governorate, Egypt, during the two successive summer seasons of 2017 and 2018 to study the effect of skipping one irrigation with or without arginine on yield and yield components of two maize hybrids (Fine Seeds-101 and T.W. 329). Omitting 5 th irrigation + 200 cm 3 / fed., arginine gave the highest values followed by control in plant height, ear length (cm), ear diameter (cm), number of row / ear, grain index, grain yield / plant, grain yield / fed., straw yield / fed., and biological yield / fed., while control gave the highest values for straw yield / plant , harvest index, protein and carbohydrate percentage. Fine Seeds-101 cultivar significantly surpassed T.W. 329 cultivar in plant height (cm), ear length (cm), ear diameter (cm), number of row / ear, grain index, grain yield / plant, straw yield / plant, protein and carbohydrate percentage in both seasons, while the differences between the two maize cultivars in grain, straw, biological yields per feddan and harvest index were not significant in both seasons. The interaction between maize cultivars and water shortage with or without arginine were not significant in all characters under study except plant height (cm), number of row / ear, grain index, grain yield / plant, biological yield / fed., and carbohydrate percentage in both seasons, where the best treatment was omitting 5 th irrigation + 200 cm 3 / fed., arginine with Fine Seeds-101 cultivar.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Skipping the fifth irrigation with arginine gave the highest values for plant height, ear length and ear diameter.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Omitting 5 th irrigation + 200 cm 3 / fed., argininee0
Outcome
plant height, ear length (cm), ear diameter (cm)e0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Omitting 5 th irrigation + 200 cm 3 / fed., arginine gave the highest values followed by control in plant height, ear length (cm), ear diameter (cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 313–461 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–39 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Skipping the fifth irrigation with arginine gave the highest row count, grain index and grain yield per plant.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Omitting 5 th irrigation + 200 cm 3 / fed., argininee0
Outcome
number of row / ear, grain index, grain yield / plante0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Omitting 5 th irrigation + 200 cm 3 / fed., arginine gave the highest values followed by control in plant height, ear length (cm), ear diameter (cm), number of row / ear, grain index, grain yield / plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 313–516 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–39 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Skipping the fifth irrigation with arginine gave the highest grain, straw and biological yields per feddan.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Omitting 5 th irrigation + 200 cm 3 / fed., argininee0
Outcome
grain yield / fed., straw yield / fed., and biological yield / fed.e0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Omitting 5 th irrigation + 200 cm 3 / fed., arginine gave the highest values followed by control in plant height, ear length (cm), ear diameter (cm), number of row / ear, grain index, grain yield / plant, grain yield / fed., straw yield / fed., and biological yield / fed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 313–585 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–39 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The control had the highest straw yield per plant, harvest index and protein percentage.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
controle0
Outcome
straw yield / plant , harvest index, proteine0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“control gave the highest values for straw yield / plant , harvest index, protein and carbohydrate percentage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 593–701 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–39 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The control had the highest carbohydrate percentage.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
controle0
Outcome
carbohydrate percentagee0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“control gave the highest values for straw yield / plant , harvest index, protein and carbohydrate percentage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 593–701 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–39 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fine Seeds-101 significantly exceeded T.W. 329 for height, ear length and ear diameter.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Material
Fine Seeds-101e0
Outcome
plant height (cm), ear length (cm), ear diameter (cm)e0
Direction
surpassede0
Comparator
T.W. 329e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fine Seeds-101 cultivar significantly surpassed T.W. 329 cultivar in plant height (cm), ear length (cm), ear diameter (cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–825 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–39 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fine Seeds-101 significantly exceeded T.W. 329 for rows per ear, grain index and grain yield per plant.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Material
Fine Seeds-101e0
Outcome
number of row / ear, grain index, grain yield / plante0
Direction
surpassede0
Comparator
T.W. 329e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fine Seeds-101 cultivar significantly surpassed T.W. 329 cultivar in plant height (cm), ear length (cm), ear diameter (cm), number of row / ear, grain index, grain yield / plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–880 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–39 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fine Seeds-101 significantly exceeded T.W. 329 for straw yield per plant, protein and carbohydrate percentage.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Material
Fine Seeds-101e0
Outcome
straw yield / plant, protein and carbohydrate percentagee0
Direction
surpassede0
Comparator
T.W. 329e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fine Seeds-101 cultivar significantly surpassed T.W. 329 cultivar in plant height (cm), ear length (cm), ear diameter (cm), number of row / ear, grain index, grain yield / plant, straw yield / plant, protein and carbohydrate percentage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–938 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–39 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Hybrid differences in grain, straw and biological yields per feddan were not significant.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Outcome
grain, straw, biological yields per feddane0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“differences between the two maize cultivars in grain, straw, biological yields per feddan and harvest index were not significant in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 966–1110 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Hybrid differences in harvest index were not significant.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Outcome
harvest indexe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“differences between the two maize cultivars in grain, straw, biological yields per feddan and harvest index were not significant in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 966–1110 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar by water shortage and arginine interactions were significant for six traits, with Fine Seeds-101 under skipped fifth irrigation plus arginine best.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Material
Fine Seeds-101e0
Treatment
omitting 5 th irrigation + 200 cm 3 / fed., argininee0
Outcome
plant height (cm), number of row / ear, grain indexe0
Direction
beste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The interaction between maize cultivars and water shortage with or without arginine were not significant in all characters under study except plant height (cm), number of row / ear, grain index, grain yield / plant, biological yield / fed., and carbohydrate percentage in both seasons, where the best treatment was omitting 5 th irrigation + 200 cm 3 / fed., arginine with Fine Seeds-101 cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1112–1508 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar by treatment interaction was not significant for the other studied traits.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
water shortage with or without argininee0
Outcome
all characters under studye0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The interaction between maize cultivars and water shortage with or without arginine were not significant in all characters under study except plant height (cm), number of row / ear, grain index, grain yield / plant, biological yield / fed., and carbohydrate percentage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1112–1380 · show in text ↑