Paper · 2016 · Journal of Sustainable Agricultural Sciences

EFFECT OF SEEDING RATES AND NITROGEN FERTILIZER LEVELS ON YIELD AND YIELD COMPONENTS OF TWO NEW FLAX CULTIVARS

19
claims
38
verbatim quotes
14
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Two field experiments were carried out at the Experimental farm ofSakha Agricultural Research station during 2013/2014 and 2014/2015seasons to study the effect of seeding rates and nitrogen fertilizer levels ontwo new flax cultivars. The experimental design was split-split plot with fourreplications. The three seeding rates (50, 60 and 70kg/fed) were distributed inmain plot, three nitrogen levels (30, 45and 60kg fed)were allocated in sub plotand new flax cultivars(Giza11 and Giza12) were distributed in sub sub plots.The results revealed significant differences among three seeding rates on straw yield and its components as well as fiber yield and its relatedcharacters. Increasing seeding rate from 50 to 70 kg /fed. increased technicallength, straw yield/plant as well as per feddan, fiber length, fiber percentageand fiber yield/plant as well as per feddan. Increasing seeding rate decreasednumber of capsules/plant, number of seeds/plant, seed index, seed yield/plantas well as per feddan, whereas thee effect was insignificant in oil percentage.The seeding rate of 60 kg/fed.. gave higher seed yield and its component.Increasing nitrogen level from 30 to 60 kg/fed significantly increasedtechnical length, straw yield/plant, straw yield/fed, fiber length, fiberpercentage, fiber yield/plant as well as per feddan. The differences between45 and 60 kg N/fed did not reach the level of significant. Increasing nitrogenlevel from 30 to 60 kg N/fed significantly increased fruiting zone length,number of capsules/plant. Adding 45kg N/fed resulted in the highest values ofseed yield and its components. The results revealed that Giza12 cv., wassuperior than Giza 11 cv., in technical length, straw yield /plant, strawield/fed, fiber length, fiber percentage, fiber yield/plant and fiber yield/fed. While Giza 11 cv. was superior than Giza 11 cv., in fruiting zone length,number of capsules/plant, number of seeds /plant, seed yield/plant and seedindex. The interaction between seeding rate x nitrogen level was significant instem diameter, straw yield/fed, fruiting zone length, no of capsule/plant, seedindex and fiber yield./plant.The interaction between seeding rate and cultivar was significant intechnical length, straw yield/fed., fruiting zone length, number ofcapsules/plant, seed yield/plant and seed index. Also, the interaction betweennitrogen level and cultivars was significant in technical length, stem diameter,straw yield/plant as well as per feddan, fruiting zone length, number ofcapsules/plant, seed yield/plant and seed index.The interaction between seeding rate x nitrogen level x cultivar wassignificant in technical length, straw yield/fed., fruiting zone length, no. ofcapsules/plant, seed yield/fed seed yield/plant, fiber length and fiber yield/fed. From the results and under the conditions of this study, it could be concludedthat for producing the highest straw and fiber yield, it can be recommended byusing Giza 12 cv., at seeding rate of 60 kg seeds/fed, 45 kg N/fed while for high seed yield used Giza11cv, 60 kg seeds/fed. + 45 kg N /fed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 19

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing seeding rate from 50 to 70 kg/fed increased technical length, straw yield per plant and per feddan.

Treatment
Increasing seeding rate from 50 to 70 kg /fede1
Outcome
technical length, straw yield/plant as well as per feddane1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
from 50e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“TWO NEW FLAX CULTIVARS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–110 · show in text ↑
e1

“Increasing seeding rate from 50 to 70 kg /fed. increased technical length, straw yield/plant as well as per feddan, fiber length, fiber percentage and fiber yield/plant as well as per feddan”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 677–865 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing seeding rate from 50 to 70 kg/fed increased fiber length, fiber percentage and fiber yield per plant and per feddan.

Treatment
Increasing seeding rate from 50 to 70 kg /fede1
Outcome
fiber length, fiber percentage and fiber yield/plant as well as per feddane1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
from 50e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“TWO NEW FLAX CULTIVARS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–110 · show in text ↑
e1

“Increasing seeding rate from 50 to 70 kg /fed. increased technical length, straw yield/plant as well as per feddan, fiber length, fiber percentage and fiber yield/plant as well as per feddan”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 677–865 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing seeding rate decreased number of capsules, number of seeds, seed index, and seed yield per plant and per feddan.

Treatment
Increasing seeding ratee1
Outcome
number of capsules/plant, number of seeds/plant, seed index, seed yield/plant as well as per feddane1
Direction
decreasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“TWO NEW FLAX CULTIVARS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–110 · show in text ↑
e1

“Increasing seeding rate decreased number of capsules/plant, number of seeds/plant, seed index, seed yield/plant as well as per feddan, whereas thee effect was insignificant in oil percentage”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 867–1055 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seeding rate had no significant effect on oil percentage of flax.

Treatment
Increasing seeding ratee1
Outcome
oil percentagee1
Direction
insignificante1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“TWO NEW FLAX CULTIVARS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–110 · show in text ↑
e1

“Increasing seeding rate decreased number of capsules/plant, number of seeds/plant, seed index, seed yield/plant as well as per feddan, whereas thee effect was insignificant in oil percentage”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 867–1055 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A seeding rate of 60 kg/fed gave higher seed yield and its components.

Treatment
seeding rate of 60 kg/fede1
Outcome
seed yield and its componente1
Direction
highere1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“TWO NEW FLAX CULTIVARS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–110 · show in text ↑
e1

“The seeding rate of 60 kg/fed.. gave higher seed yield and its component”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen level from 30 to 60 kg/fed significantly increased technical length, straw yield per plant and per feddan.

Treatment
Increasing nitrogen level from 30 to 60 kg/fede1
Outcome
technical length, straw yield/plant, straw yield/fede1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
from 30e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“TWO NEW FLAX CULTIVARS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–110 · show in text ↑
e1

“Increasing nitrogen level from 30 to 60 kg/fed significantly increasedtechnical length, straw yield/plant, straw yield/fed, fiber length, fiber percentage, fiber yield/plant as well as per feddan”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1129–1323 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen level from 30 to 60 kg/fed significantly increased fiber length, fiber percentage and fiber yield per plant and per feddan.

Treatment
Increasing nitrogen level from 30 to 60 kg/fede1
Outcome
fiber length, fiber percentage, fiber yield/plant as well as per feddane1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
from 30e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“TWO NEW FLAX CULTIVARS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–110 · show in text ↑
e1

“Increasing nitrogen level from 30 to 60 kg/fed significantly increasedtechnical length, straw yield/plant, straw yield/fed, fiber length, fiber percentage, fiber yield/plant as well as per feddan”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1129–1323 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The differences between 45 and 60 kg N/fed did not reach statistical significance.

Treatment
45 and 60 kg N/fede1

Not reportedComparatorOutcomeDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“TWO NEW FLAX CULTIVARS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–110 · show in text ↑
e1

“The differences between45 and 60 kg N/fed did not reach the level of significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1325–1405 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding 45 kg N/fed resulted in the highest values of seed yield and its components.

Treatment
Adding 45kg N/fede1
Outcome
seed yield and its componentse1
Direction
higheste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“TWO NEW FLAX CULTIVARS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–110 · show in text ↑
e1

“Adding 45kg N/fed resulted in the highest values of seed yield and its components”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1526–1606 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Giza 12 was superior to Giza 11 in technical length, straw yield per plant and per feddan.

Material
Giza12e1
Outcome
technical length, straw yield /plant, strawield/fede1
Direction
superiore1
Comparator
Giza 11e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“TWO NEW FLAX CULTIVARS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–110 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results revealed that Giza12 cv., wassuperior than Giza 11 cv., in technical length, straw yield /plant, strawield/fed, fiber length, fiber percentage, fiber yield/plant and fiber yield/fed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1608–1801 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Giza 12 was superior to Giza 11 in fiber length, fiber percentage and fiber yield per plant and per feddan.

Material
Giza12e1
Outcome
fiber length, fiber percentage, fiber yield/plant and fiber yield/fede1
Direction
superiore1
Comparator
Giza 11e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“TWO NEW FLAX CULTIVARS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–110 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results revealed that Giza12 cv., wassuperior than Giza 11 cv., in technical length, straw yield /plant, strawield/fed, fiber length, fiber percentage, fiber yield/plant and fiber yield/fed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1608–1801 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Giza 11 was superior to the other cultivar (written as Giza 11 cv.) in fruiting zone length, number of capsules and number of seeds per plant.

Material
Giza 11e2
Outcome
fruiting zone length, number of capsules/plant, number of seeds /plante2
Direction
superiore2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“TWO NEW FLAX CULTIVARS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–110 · show in text ↑
e2

“While Giza 11 cv. was superior than Giza 11 cv., in fruiting zone length, number of capsules/plant, number of seeds /plant, seed yield/plant and seedindex”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1803–1956 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Giza 11 was superior to the other cultivar (written as Giza 11 cv.) in seed yield per plant and seed index.

Material
Giza 11e2
Outcome
seed yield/plant and seedindexe2
Direction
superiore2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“TWO NEW FLAX CULTIVARS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–110 · show in text ↑
e2

“While Giza 11 cv. was superior than Giza 11 cv., in fruiting zone length, number of capsules/plant, number of seeds /plant, seed yield/plant and seedindex”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1803–1956 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seeding rate by nitrogen level interaction was significant for stem diameter, straw yield per feddan, fruiting zone length, capsules, seed index and fiber yield per plant.

Treatment
seeding rate x nitrogen levele3
Outcome
stem diameter, straw yield/fed, fruiting zone length, no of capsule/plant, seedindex and fiber yield./plante3

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“TWO NEW FLAX CULTIVARS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–110 · show in text ↑
e3

“The interaction between seeding rate x nitrogen level was significant instem diameter, straw yield/fed, fruiting zone length, no of capsule/plant, seedindex and fiber yield./plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1958–2137 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seeding rate by cultivar interaction was significant for technical length, straw yield per feddan, fruiting zone length, capsules, seed yield per plant and seed index.

Treatment
seeding rate and cultivare4
Outcome
technical length, straw yield/fed., fruiting zone length, number ofcapsules/plant, seed yield/plant and seed indexe4

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“TWO NEW FLAX CULTIVARS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–110 · show in text ↑
e4

“The interaction between seeding rate and cultivar was significant intechnical length, straw yield/fed., fruiting zone length, number ofcapsules/plant, seed yield/plant and seed index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2138–2320 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen level by cultivar interaction was significant for technical length, stem diameter, straw yield, fruiting zone length, capsules, seed yield per plant and seed index.

Treatment
nitrogen level and cultivarse5
Outcome
technical length, stem diameter, straw yield/plant as well as per feddan, fruiting zone length, number ofcapsules/plant, seed yield/plant and seed indexe5

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“TWO NEW FLAX CULTIVARS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–110 · show in text ↑
e5

“Also, the interaction betweennitrogen level and cultivars was significant in technical length, stem diameter, straw yield/plant as well as per feddan, fruiting zone length, number ofcapsules/plant, seed yield/plant and seed index”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 2322–2550 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seeding rate by nitrogen level by cultivar interaction was significant for technical length, straw yield, fruiting zone length, capsules, seed yield, fiber length and fiber yield.

Treatment
seeding rate x nitrogen level x cultivare6
Outcome
technical length, straw yield/fed., fruiting zone length, no. ofcapsules/plant, seed yield/fed seed yield/plant, fiber length and fiber yield/fede6

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“TWO NEW FLAX CULTIVARS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–110 · show in text ↑
e6

“The interaction between seeding rate x nitrogen level x cultivar wassignificant in technical length, straw yield/fed., fruiting zone length, no. ofcapsules/plant, seed yield/fed seed yield/plant, fiber length and fiber yield/fed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2551–2779 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

For the highest straw and fiber yield, Giza 12 is recommended at 60 kg seeds/fed and 45 kg N/fed.

Material
Giza 12 cv.e7
Treatment
seeding rate of 60 kg seeds/fed, 45 kg N/fede7
Outcome
highest straw and fiber yielde7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“TWO NEW FLAX CULTIVARS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–110 · show in text ↑
e7

“for producing the highest straw and fiber yield, it can be recommended byusingGiza 12 cv., at seeding rate of 60 kg seeds/fed, 45 kg N/fed”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 2864–3003 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

For high seed yield, Giza 11 is recommended at 60 kg seeds/fed and 45 kg N/fed.

Material
Giza11cve7
Treatment
60 kg seeds/fed. + 45 kg N /fede7
Outcome
high seed yielde7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“TWO NEW FLAX CULTIVARS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–110 · show in text ↑
e7

“for high seed yield used Giza11cv, 60 kg seeds/fed. + 45 kg N /fed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3010–3076 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Linum usitatissimum (flax)Results differ

61 papers: 59 positive, 2 negative or no effect

58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

density · quality: oil · Linum usitatissimum (flax)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 4 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

nitrogen · quality: grain · Linum usitatissimum (flax)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 15 positive, 1 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

density · yield · Linum usitatissimum (flax)Positive and negative results

45 papers: 30 positive, 15 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

41 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

density · quality: grain · Linum usitatissimum (flax)Results agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.