Paper · 1991 · Agronomy Journal

Chloride Fertilizer Effects on Winter Wheat Inoculated with Fusarium culmorum

R. E. Engel; W. E. Grey

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
20
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Studies in the Northern Great Plains indicate that Cl fertilizers sometimes increase yield and reduce the severity of root diseases in small grains. Little information exists from this region on the relationship between Cl and common root rot incited by Fusarium culmorum (W.C. Sm.) Sacc., or the effect of Cl on winter wheat ( Trificum aestivum L.) yield. The objectives of this study were to address these issues. Field experiments were conducted in south central Montana during 1988 and 1989 on a Fort Collins soil (fine‐loamy, mixed, mesic Ustollic Haplargids) that contained 57 and 39) kg Cl ha −1 (0−120 cm), respectively. The experiment consisted or two cultivars of winter wheat (Redwin and Cree), three seed treatments (heat sterilized F. culmorum , live F. culmorum plus chemical protectant, and live F. culmorum , and four CI fertilizer levels (0, 22.5, 45, and 90 kg Cl ha −1 ) in complete factorial arrangement. In. spection of lower stems and subcrown internodes at the soft dough stage indicated no effect from Cl on disease severity. Chloride fertilizer significantly increased grain yield in 1988 (P < 0.001), but not in 1989. In 1988 grain yields at 22.5, 45, and 90 kg Cl ha −1 were not different and averaged 3306 kg ha −1 , or 227 kg ha −1 more than plants not receiving Cl. Whole plant Cl concentrations at heading and indigenous soil Cl were not reliable predictors of yield response to C1 fertilizer. Seasonal factors may be important in defining the likelihood of a response to Cl fertilizer in addition to soil and plant Cl status.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chloride had no reported effect on disease severity at soft dough stage.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Organ / stage
lower stems and subcrown internodese0
Treatment
Cle0
Outcome
disease severitye0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spection of lower stems and subcrown internodes at the soft dough stage indicated no effect from Cl on disease severity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–1058 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chloride fertilizer significantly increased grain yield in 1988.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Chloride fertilizere0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
1988e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chloride fertilizer significantly increased grain yield in 1988 (P < 0.001), but not in 1989.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1059–1152 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chloride fertilizer did not significantly increase grain yield in 1989.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Chloride fertilizere0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
not in 1989e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chloride fertilizer significantly increased grain yield in 1988 (P < 0.001), but not in 1989.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1059–1152 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1988 the three chloride rates did not differ in grain yield.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
22.5, 45, and 90 kg Cl ha −1e0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
more thane0
Value
227 kg ha −1e0
Qualifier
3306 kg ha −1e0
Comparator
plants not receiving Cle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 1988 grain yields at 22.5, 45, and 90 kg Cl ha −1 were not different and averaged 3306 kg ha −1 , or 227 kg ha −1 more than plants not receiving Cl.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1153–1304 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–43 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant and soil chloride levels were unreliable predictors of yield response to chloride fertilizer.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Organ / stage
headinge0
Compound
Cle0
Outcome
yield response to C1 fertilizere0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Whole plant Cl concentrations at heading and indigenous soil Cl were not reliable predictors of yield response to C1 fertilizer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1305–1433 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–43 · show in text ↑

chloride · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

18 papers: 16 positive, 2 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.